| Which city do you think it is, the city with most spoiled residents, most out of touch with the real world values and most entitled? I think New York, LA, San Francisco, D.C. What do you think? |
| DC. |
+1. |
| New York. dc seems very normal to me and I lived in NY previously. |
| San Francisco has become the Land of the Douchebag -- gets my vote. |
|
You mean most one percenters per capita?
Or wealth extremes? |
| Gotta be San Fran |
| Washington DC and its close in suburbs |
| NYC hands down. Manhattan -- excluding Harlem -- is a bubble and people very quickly lose touch with what's happening in the country outside that bubble. I say this living in DC now -- some of that exists here but MUCH MUCH less. |
| We have a ton of regular workaday schlubs (including myself) just trying to get back and forth on Metro, not always successfully. So not DC. I would say LA or San Francisco. LA just seems very vain and superficial. |
| SF is pretty awful especially after the Facebook era. Worse than West LA, DC and Manhattan. I've lived in all those. |
| PP here. SF is bad because a lot of the successful people got rich young and were always stars. They never had to struggle, or even work in a normal setting without a zillion perks. I briefly lived in a very rich Silicon valley town as well as the city of sf. |
| NY, LA. |
|
My vote is for New York. While most people are down to earth and not spoiled, there are still a whole lot who are really in the stratosphere on being out of touch, e.g. Donald J. Trump.
My second guess would be Newark, NJ and Trenton, NJ. The people I have met from this area act like they own the world but are unusually dim. It's such an odd combination of character traits and I've easily met 10-15 people from this area who are like this. |
Extremes, for the most part, obviously not people who live in poverty. But also the upper middle class that is more out of control, whether they can afford it or not. |