Is Prince William jealous of Harry and Meghan's popularity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Sophie due IVF for child #2 and she was 40? No one seemed to speculate about her uterus. Why so much drama about Meghan's?

M seems to have brought some negative media coverage thanks to bridezilla behavior, yelling at Kate's staff, having her own staff quit, and now with this move to Frogmore.

Speculation and gossip about royals and other public figures is normal and to be expected. There's no reason not to.

Remember: Diana was in the gossip columns all the time before she died, and coverage was far from positive. She wasn't sainted until after her death...and then everyone seemed to forget the immature and bizarre things she did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where was all this SN speculation about Kate's recent pregnancy? After all she's just 5 months younger than Meghan. Does Prince Louis have special needs? Maybe that's the reason he hasn't been seen as much as George and Charlotte were at his age.

Does that sound ridiculous? Yes of course it does and so does all of this nasty speculation in regards to MM's baby. Some of you truly need help.

Psssst we are talking aboit twins vs singletons. Keep up!

PP has a point - why HAS he been kept so secluded. With a geriatric mother perhaps there’s something wrong with him?

The third child never has as many pictures. In any family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Media reports are saying she is considering a home birth. I Doubt that option would be floated if she were having twins.

I also had twins (I was 35, so AMA). No way would I consider a home birth.

She isn't having twins.

And if she opts for a home birth, then that confirms my suspicions that she is a super type A, know-it-all control freak. I suspect that's what Harry likes a lot her, but I also suspect that's what rubs W+K the wrong way.

If anything this proves the media knows nothing and is desperate for more Sussex information. A home birth? LOL

All of Queen Elizabeth's children were born at "home" (most of them at Buckingham Palace, but still not a hospital). I think Prince William was the first Royal in the direct line of succession to be born in a hospital. Obviously, a member of the Royal Family would have a different level of care when she was giving birth at home vs. your average woman giving birth at home in her bathtub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Sophie due IVF for child #2 and she was 40? No one seemed to speculate about her uterus. Why so much drama about Meghan's?

M seems to have brought some negative media coverage thanks to bridezilla behavior, yelling at Kate's staff, having her own staff quit, and now with this move to Frogmore.

Speculation and gossip about royals and other public figures is normal and to be expected. There's no reason not to.

Remember: Diana was in the gossip columns all the time before she died, and coverage was far from positive. She wasn't sainted until after her death...and then everyone seemed to forget the immature and bizarre things she did.

No Meghan actually didn’t bring negative coverage. Kate has done the same things or worse but the media handles her with kid gloves. She’s shown up to events looking ready to cry, had major wardrobe malfunctions, and several of her Anmer Hall staff up and quit.

For some reason the UK media really wants Meghan portrayed as Fergie. Too bad it’s not working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Media reports are saying she is considering a home birth. I Doubt that option would be floated if she were having twins.

I also had twins (I was 35, so AMA). No way would I consider a home birth.

She isn't having twins.

And if she opts for a home birth, then that confirms my suspicions that she is a super type A, know-it-all control freak. I suspect that's what Harry likes a lot her, but I also suspect that's what rubs W+K the wrong way.

If anything this proves the media knows nothing and is desperate for more Sussex information. A home birth? LOL

All of Queen Elizabeth's children were born at "home" (most of them at Buckingham Palace, but still not a hospital). I think Prince William was the first Royal in the direct line of succession to be born in a hospital. Obviously, a member of the Royal Family would have a different level of care when she was giving birth at home vs. your average woman giving birth at home in her bathtub.

Yes and the Queen was also the last monarch to receive an inadequate education - what’s your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t want the lives of ANY of these people. I can’t imagine having to attend event after event, meet countless people and have my entire life on display. Not to mention not really “own” anything they have or use. I’d rather live in a DC rowhouse that is MINE than live in a royal palace owned by the “crown.” Kate looks horrible here days and it’s probably because the opulence and wealth no longer impressed her and she has realized her life kind of stinks. She will never really have a day off in her life.

They’re life is a lot more stressful than we know.

That photo was taken at the memorial for the Leicester football club owner and family/friends who died in the helicopter crash. She should not have been smiling.

She’s not smiling. She looks haggard.

I think the Kate stans on DCUM are bizarre, but this is ridiculous, mean, and unnecessary. She looks like a woman at a memorial service looks. Also, try not to be so sexist in your criticism; there are plenty of good reasons to criticize the monarchy but Kate's looks aren't one of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Sophie due IVF for child #2 and she was 40? No one seemed to speculate about her uterus. Why so much drama about Meghan's?

M seems to have brought some negative media coverage thanks to bridezilla behavior, yelling at Kate's staff, having her own staff quit, and now with this move to Frogmore.

Speculation and gossip about royals and other public figures is normal and to be expected. There's no reason not to.

Remember: Diana was in the gossip columns all the time before she died, and coverage was far from positive. She wasn't sainted until after her death...and then everyone seemed to forget the immature and bizarre things she did.

William and Kate also have had a lot of staff turnover. At least with respect to press professionals the royals don’t pay as much as a lot of these people could get working somewhere else.

[Anonymous]

No time to read entire thread, is she actually pregnant or doing the Beyonce first child thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe it. She looks just like Charlene pregnant at 5 months with her twins. The princess of Monaco carried small until almost the 6th month.

https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2014092621147/princess-charlene-pregnant-new-york/

Charlene at 5 months.


Meghan at 4 months.

New picture of Meghan and I can almost guarantee it’s twins. She’s gotten much bigger since October and is hiding just how much.

[Anonymous]

If it’s twins they’ll announce it.

I don’t think it is.

But I don’t get the person who wants to call it early. What. do you get points for being the first to correctly speculate?

[Anonymous]

BBC to air musical comedy based on the life of Meghan Markle: the 'Sixth In Line to be King and I'

LOL Nope, not a joke. Now we know why the Middleton’s have been so anxious.



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2018/12/06/bbc-air-musical-comedy-based-life-meghan-markle-sixth-line-king/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BBC to air musical comedy based on the life of Meghan Markle: the 'Sixth In Line to be King and I'

LOL Nope, not a joke. Now we know why the Middleton’s have been so anxious.



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2018/12/06/bbc-air-musical-comedy-based-life-meghan-markle-sixth-line-king/

Why would the Middleton’s be anxious? Sounds like it will poke a lot of fun at Harry and Meghan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC to air musical comedy based on the life of Meghan Markle: the 'Sixth In Line to be King and I'

LOL Nope, not a joke. Now we know why the Middleton’s have been so anxious.



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2018/12/06/bbc-air-musical-comedy-based-life-meghan-markle-sixth-line-king/

Why would the Middleton’s be anxious? Sounds like it will poke a lot of fun at Harry and Meghan.

17 years and I can’t think of anyone being this interested in Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BBC to air musical comedy based on the life of Meghan Markle: the 'Sixth In Line to be King and I'

LOL Nope, not a joke. Now we know why the Middleton’s have been so anxious.



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2018/12/06/bbc-air-musical-comedy-based-life-meghan-markle-sixth-line-king/

Why would the Middleton’s be anxious? Sounds like it will poke a lot of fun at Harry and Meghan.

17 years and I can’t think of anyone being this interested in Kate.

This is slightly hilarious because the BBC is the biggest UK network and the same one that refused to air Eugenie’s once-in-a-lifetime wedding. But they have time to air a musical comedy about a woman that’s been in the family half a year? Andrew must be pissed.

[Anonymous]

Diana would have been mortified with Her son marrying Megan. She is constantly promoting herself and manipulating things to get herself front and center. Plus her lack of a good upbringing, the cultural differences, and age/divorce