Senate Democrats sending secret letter about Kavanaugh to FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

And then she sought psychotherapy for it? Not likely.

We have no proof of that claim either.

I don't think the Democrats would have raised this to the FBI without some corraborating evidence.

But they did. There was no evidence provided. Do you think we wouldn't have heard about that? Do you think the FBI would've dropped it like a hot potato as fast as they did if there were something available to look into?

You don't know what exactly is in the letter. The FBI says they dropped it because it came so late in the confirmation process. If they had received it sooner, they would have investigated it.

Source? And your butt doesn't count.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

And then she sought psychotherapy for it? Not likely.

We have no proof of that claim either.

I don't think the Democrats would have raised this to the FBI without some corraborating evidence.

But they did. There was no evidence provided. Do you think we wouldn't have heard about that? Do you think the FBI would've dropped it like a hot potato as fast as they did if there were something available to look into?

You don't know what exactly is in the letter. The FBI says they dropped it because it came so late in the confirmation process. If they had received it sooner, they would have investigated it.

They said that?

No, they said nothing of the sort. PP is making stuff up.

+1
It's amazing to me how liberals think nothing of lying if they think they can get away with it. And they complain about the Trump administration - these people are such hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clearly, this woman did not want to be destroyed by the GOP machine. But after 30 years, it still bothered her. She didn't want to come forward and ruin her life, but she wanted to let someone know about it because it tells us something important about the character of a man who wants to be on the Supreme Court.

Bravo to her for stepping forward. But she obviously wasn't taken seriously, or else her accusation would have been brought forward during the Senate hearings. If she watched the Anita Hill tapes, she would have seen what she was in for, and wanted no part of it. Anita Hill went through hell as a result of her testimony before the Senate. Who would want to put themselves through that?

An anonymous accusation tells us nothing whatsoever about the character of this man, or any person. It is simply an anonymous person claiming something happened (long, long ago). I, an anonymous poster, could do the very same thing. I think you're a rapist. I think it's important for the DCUM community to know this about you. You're welcome.

Also - she didn't step forward. Not by a long shot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

And then she sought psychotherapy for it? Not likely.

We have no proof of that claim either.

I don't think the Democrats would have raised this to the FBI without some corraborating evidence.

But they did. There was no evidence provided. Do you think we wouldn't have heard about that? Do you think the FBI would've dropped it like a hot potato as fast as they did if there were something available to look into?

You don't know what exactly is in the letter. The FBI says they dropped it because it came so late in the confirmation process. If they had received it sooner, they would have investigated it.

They said that?

Nope. PP is a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it is coming out that many of the women who signed this letter didn't actually know what they were signing on to.

Source?

Don't hold your breath, PP. These crazy liberals are just throwing out lie after lie in the desperate hope that *something* sticks.

Politico and Buzzfeed both have articles about this.

I've searched both and found nothing. Can you please link the articles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clearly, this woman did not want to be destroyed by the GOP machine. But after 30 years, it still bothered her. She didn't want to come forward and ruin her life, but she wanted to let someone know about it because it tells us something important about the character of a man who wants to be on the Supreme Court.

Bravo to her for stepping forward. But she obviously wasn't taken seriously, or else her accusation would have been brought forward during the Senate hearings. If she watched the Anita Hill tapes, she would have seen what she was in for, and wanted no part of it. Anita Hill went through hell as a result of her testimony before the Senate. Who would want to put themselves through that?

An anonymous accusation tells us nothing whatsoever about the character of this man, or any person. It is simply an anonymous person claiming something happened (long, long ago). I, an anonymous poster, could do the very same thing. I think you're a rapist. I think it's important for the DCUM community to know this about you. You're welcome.

Also - she didn't step forward. Not by a long shot.

If she didn't want to ruin her life, she should've thought about how her accusation could ruin his. How can he properly defend himself to an anonymous accuser? Dems will forever brand him by this. Hmmm...on second thought, perhaps that was enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe she remembers the Thomas Hearings where Anita Hill was excoriated, bullied, called a liar, and of being a pervert herself by a little preppie who said she put a pubic hair in a note to him! She also remembers that the dottering senile old fool Orrin Hatch who, along with Arlen Spector and the crazy senator from Missouri, who led this crusade to discredit her with every sordid inneundo in their loathsome and disgusting minds could come up with. Hatch is still there and he would have had all of his cadre of GOP gouhls to help him do this again.

Surely you mean, "ghouls"? I'm worried about your mental state.

You should worry about a president who cannot pronounce "anonymous.".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

True.

+2

Posts like this are why people hate conservatives. Congratulations.

I'm not sure what being skeptical of a 30+ yr. account of someone who was drunk at the time of the alleged incident has to do with being conservative. But congratulations to you - liberals are despised these days.

It's one thing to be skeptical, it's something else entirely to twist the allegation around to "she was just pissed that Brett wouldn't give it up for her and laughed at her"

This is rich, considering the incredible spinning going on in this thread by liberals trying to make this into more than it was. Not only insisting that he must be guilty (of what, exactly?), but that he's now a "sexual predator" and probably was in college and in fact, probably abuses his clerks. You people win the award for most disgusting twisting of words and outright lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it is coming out that many of the women who signed this letter didn't actually know what they were signing on to.

Source?

Don't hold your breath, PP. These crazy liberals are just throwing out lie after lie in the desperate hope that *something* sticks.

Politico and Buzzfeed both have articles about this.

Can't wait to see those links, PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now it is coming out that many of the women who signed this letter didn't actually know what they were signing on to.

You're a liar. You know it, we all know it.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/virginia-hume/about-that-letter-from-women-in-support-of-brett-kavanaugh

Virginia Hume works for the GOP Maachine, Her dad is Britt.

Zero independent credibility.

I know exactly who she is. You're aware the women who signed that letter are non-partisan, right? Sadly, it is you and others seeking to spread misinformation (lies) on this thread who have zero independent credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

And then she sought psychotherapy for it? Not likely.

We have no proof of that claim either.

I don't think the Democrats would have raised this to the FBI without some corraborating evidence.

But they did. There was no evidence provided. Do you think we wouldn't have heard about that? Do you think the FBI would've dropped it like a hot potato as fast as they did if there were something available to look into?

You don't know what exactly is in the letter. The FBI says they dropped it because it came so late in the confirmation process. If they had received it sooner, they would have investigated it.

Source? And your butt doesn't count.

Source is https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b9a90eee4b01151973bca90

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clearly, this woman did not want to be destroyed by the GOP machine. But after 30 years, it still bothered her. She didn't want to come forward and ruin her life, but she wanted to let someone know about it because it tells us something important about the character of a man who wants to be on the Supreme Court.

Bravo to her for stepping forward. But she obviously wasn't taken seriously, or else her accusation would have been brought forward during the Senate hearings. If she watched the Anita Hill tapes, she would have seen what she was in for, and wanted no part of it. Anita Hill went through hell as a result of her testimony before the Senate. Who would want to put themselves through that?

An anonymous accusation tells us nothing whatsoever about the character of this man, or any person. It is simply an anonymous person claiming something happened (long, long ago). I, an anonymous poster, could do the very same thing. I think you're a rapist. I think it's important for the DCUM community to know this about you. You're welcome.

Also - she didn't step forward. Not by a long shot.

If she didn't want to ruin her life, she should've thought about how her accusation could ruin his. How can he properly defend himself to an anonymous accuser? Dems will forever brand him by this. Hmmm...on second thought, perhaps that was enough.

Exactly. Mission accomplished on their part. Lovely people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

True.

+2

Posts like this are why people hate conservatives. Congratulations.

I'm not sure what being skeptical of a 30+ yr. account of someone who was drunk at the time of the alleged incident has to do with being conservative. But congratulations to you - liberals are despised these days.

It's one thing to be skeptical, it's something else entirely to twist the allegation around to "she was just pissed that Brett wouldn't give it up for her and laughed at her"

This is rich, considering the incredible spinning going on in this thread by liberals trying to make this into more than it was. Not only insisting that he must be guilty (of what, exactly?), but that he's now a "sexual predator" and probably was in college and in fact, probably abuses his clerks. You people win the award for most disgusting twisting of words and outright lies.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y'all who are poo pooing this, need to ask, if there was no there there, why and how did the GOP anticipate needing 65 women (who didn't go to high school with Brett) to sign a letter saying he was a nice boy?

--w
No one said they anticipated it. Ever heard of social media? Pretty sure that the girls' school alums are likely pretty close knit, even today. How long would it take to put that together? Not long at all. Especially, if a few of them are very good friends of his. And, yes, the girls' schools and the boys' schools do socialize together.

But, I'm sure we will get more information when the woman gets her television interview.

As an alum of a DC girls' school, I can safely say it probably took 10 minutes to pull that list together. The DC Catholic and private school network is incredibly tight knit. I don't like Brett Kavanaugh, and definitely don't want him confirmed, but I know most of the women on that list. Hell, I've probably been to a party with Brett Kavanaugh.

But just because 65 women weren't sexually assaulted doesn't mean that one wasn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh's buddy - his alibi - is Mark Judge, who wrote the (in)famous "I wasn't a racist until an imaginary black guy stole my bicycle" essay

https://dailycaller.com/2012/04/09/the-end-of-my-white-guilt/

He's also written books on his teenage alcoholism and the orthodox Catholic sexual culture at Georgetown Prep. Google and you can find the story of how he lost his virginity after yet another drunken Georgetown Prep party.

He also didn’t deny that this happened.

"Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, 'I have no recollection of that.'"

It's possible he doesn't recall because he was drunk, but that in no way lets Kavanaugh off the hook.

Equally as possible that the woman was drunk and misremembers. Or that she was trying to have sex with Kavanaugh and has second thoughts after he laughed at her and therefore called it “rape.”

And then she sought psychotherapy for it? Not likely.

We have no proof of that claim either.

I don't think the Democrats would have raised this to the FBI without some corraborating evidence.

But they did. There was no evidence provided. Do you think we wouldn't have heard about that? Do you think the FBI would've dropped it like a hot potato as fast as they did if there were something available to look into?

You don't know what exactly is in the letter. The FBI says they dropped it because it came so late in the confirmation process. If they had received it sooner, they would have investigated it.

Source? And your butt doesn't count.

Source is https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5b9a90eee4b01151973bca90

That’s funny the way they stated it like it was fact. No other media outlet said that, and the FBI didn’t either. This 11th hour accusation is uncharted territory. They’re making that up.