Girls ID Season 26/27 Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

[Anonymous]

Noob question. In regard to an offer, is it only sent through email or sent through the app that the club uses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

all true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Noob question. In regard to an offer, is it only sent through email or sent through the app that the club uses?

Should be from the app but should get an email notification with it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Noob question. In regard to an offer, is it only sent through email or sent through the app that the club uses?

Often both because the platform begins the part where they take payment. It forms a contract when you accept.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

How strong is the group of trapped 11’s moving to the 12’s? Were they core/starters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

How strong is the group of trapped 11’s moving to the 12’s? Were they core/starters?

Yes, mostly starters and the two goalies. 2011s is a young team! If they have to play U15 again that team will be strong plus the SYC outsiders.

[Anonymous]

No Arl bags cause Arl had practice before traveling to play Beach on Saturday (game got postponed due to bad January weather). So no Arl bags will be there on Saturday either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

Aren't several trapped VDA 10s moving down to 11s too? Doesn't seem like that would leave too many open roster spots on 11s. I guess it also depends on positions of the trapped players moving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

I think this is a fair assessment. The weather delays (gratefully) took the air out of this stupid early try out season. More moves have been made mid season than for next year. And for the 2014s, you guys are an anomaly. Keep your kid showing up.[b] If you feel like they got overlooked and really can keep up ask to attend a training in April or May, or join the USL--Y team.

Can you explain what you mean by this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

I think this is a fair assessment. The weather delays (gratefully) took the air out of this stupid early try out season. More moves have been made mid season than for next year. And for the 2014s, you guys are an anomaly. Keep your kid showing up.[b] If you feel like they got overlooked and really can keep up ask to attend a training in April or May, or join the USL--Y team.

Can you explain what you mean by this?

Sorry I messed up the bolding. Wondering what you meant by "And for the 2014s, you guys are an anomaly. Keep your kid showing up."

[Anonymous]

Why would outside 2012's want to come to VDA now and compete with ALL the 2011's? I am sure they will be given first priority with the amount coming down, literally a whole team

[Anonymous]

How was turnout at McLean?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think they all go. It seems that most clubs are not seeing as much interest as they had hoped for based ooff of session registrations, including VDA. That hardline they are taking is about to get softer.

Not much turnout from outside surprisingly. The outside players that transferred mid season were there among a lot of 2011s who are probably dropping. That is the VDA roster for 2026/27. The rest was just a show and the whole tryout was kickball and unnecessary dribbling( basically keep dribbling until you lose the ball) Wonder if that is how the teams play.

not much turnout = no arl bags

Its ok to say it. Those girls most likely were extended offers and didn’t have to show up.

The rest of the observation seems harsh. That team will be an interesting team if some players decide not to come down

The narrative of “did not have to show up” is wrong because the known outside players who joined were there. Only Arl bags are then exempt ones?

They were there despite being told they didn’t have to show up.

See. You are trying to tell us that VDA 12s had 30+ players yesterday on the field (majority were 2011s) plus the outside players who did not have to show up? What roster side are we looking at here? 40? Does not make sense. The reality is whoever was there yesterday was there, BP dropped a lot of 11s down and that will be the roster plus few outsiders who already got offers before yesterday’s show. That is all. No more parent rumors making everyone believe the whole DMV is going to VDA.

Truth is roster is set and it is mainly VDA trapped players plus few from
Outside. That will leave a lot of space in the 11s and a lot of FVU bags were spotted in the 11s session

FVU bags spotted in a few places. Think the team is going to lose 5-6.