Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am a current GFR parent, U10-U13 girl side. I know nothing about the Board conflict except the rumors circulated here. We’ve been with GFR since pre-travel and, while there’s always something to complain about, we’ve generally been happy with our DD’s development, the coaching and training, the other girls, and other parents, and we’re probably inclined to stick it out. That said,
(1) This whole mess has definitely been harmful to the players. Boys side, oldest and U-Little girls, maybe not so much except the hit to the club’s reputation. But the middle range of girls whose coaches were impacted by this have been hurt. Multiple teams are on their third coach for the season. Different training and playing styles. Lack of consistent messaging and chaos.
(2) The timing of the disruption has also been harmful. Just before the spring season begins, less than a month before tryouts. Lack of clarity on coaching slates. People from the interim regime who had little experience with the girls involved in making 2025/26 offers. The interim regime sent out offers on Sunday even though everyone knew there was at least some uncertainty about coaches until the board meeting Monday evening. Now the new/returning club leadership and new coaching slate will have to figure out how to address these pending offers. I know for a fact that several talented girls in this age range have gone to other clubs because of the chaos and uncertainty, and maybe more yet to come. I hope we have clarity on the final coaching slate going forward soon and the club can retain a solid core of players.
(3) Nothing I have heard about what happened with the ED and TF seems sufficient to justify this level of disruption. If there were some issue with the club’s arrangements with TF/NM, why couldn’t the board work that out in the off-season? The arrangement had been in place for more than a year. What changed? Why the need to blow everything up suddenly in early April? Maybe there was a reason but no information has been shared that supports this, and ordinarily the whole purpose of having a board is to work these things out together, not to make sudden and precipitous moves that will hurt the club.
(4) I have no inside information but the rumors on the board here suggest TF/NM was getting something like $480k-$500k per year. But those complaining about that amount ignore the fact that this was for 7-8 coaches covering 18-24 teams. I don’t know what coaches typically are paid or what other services the contract had TF/NM providing on top of coaching, but even if these numbers are right and it was all just for the coaches, that would just be something on the order of $20k-$25k per coach per team. Given that professional coaching is the primary thing we’re paying for and club fees per team are in the $36k-$45k range, these numbers don’t seem crazy. Since all the coaches need to be paid, I don’t see how anyone’s getting rich off this.
(5) GFR club fees are comparable to other clubs. So far we have gotten coaching and development that we were pleased with for those amounts. As long as that remains the case, why should parents care whether, on the backend, the coaches are employed directly by the club or though a contractor? I understand why there might be disagreements and jealousy among the coaching staff if some have more favorable arrangements than others, but that’s always the case in any business if some employees are more valued than others. As long as everything is legal and reasonably fair, all that seems to matter is whether the players are getting the experience that they paid for at a price that’s competitive with other clubs.
But if new to GFR, better to know before tryouts because whatever is going on, house is not stable so better to know that before lock in to non-refundable payment terms.