Woman charged with felony for having a stillbirth

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I looked up the definition of a stillbirth and the WHO says it’s 28 weeks. So, unless Ohio has a different legal definition this was a miscarriage.

Heartbreaking, but legally not the same.


Do miscarriage remains have to be disposed of in a particular way? Are they treated differently than stillborn remains?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!


I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.


Very sorry about your baby. At least you had the luxury of being in a hospital to receive care, painkillers, deliver her on a bed, and where a nurse cleaned and dressed her to give back you to to hold. That is right and proper.

No one sent you home to deliver your preemie into a toilet with the expectations of you having fish it out with your own hand amidst all the blood, clots, uterine tissue, placenta, fecal matter, urine, and toilet paper in the water.

When you've experienced that horror story, without having any spouse or friendly faces next to you to help you out, come back and tell us about how we are all inhuman for supporting a woman who did go through it.


Oh, but they did send me home. Ten hours later when the baby was actually coming, I went back. After dropping a ton of blood in the toilet, experiencing the unbearable pain of childbirth, I still had the wherewithal to go back.


Interesting. Did you flush?
Anonymous
That poor woman is going to be forced to get in front of non-medical professional men and testify in public about her menstrual cycle, when she had sex, when her water broke, what her labor pains were like, how long it took for the fetus to come out of her vagina, what else was in the toilet, how much she bled, etc etc. Awful to put her through that after she had a pregnancy loss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I looked up the definition of a stillbirth and the WHO says it’s 28 weeks. So, unless Ohio has a different legal definition this was a miscarriage.

Heartbreaking, but legally not the same.


Do miscarriage remains have to be disposed of in a particular way? Are they treated differently than stillborn remains?


The only reasonable thing for an Ohio woman to do is put the miscarriage into a baggie and mail it to the Warren, Ohio police to decide what to do with it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:what is wrong with you people? read the psot. She left the fetus in the toilet "and went about with her life"


do you know how many miscarriages are flushed? at what point does it become a felony? the women of Ohio need to know, since in between getting denied care for their high-risk pregnancies, this may happen.


I flushed my miscarriage down the toilet. Was I not supposed to?




Was it a baby size?


Define "baby size".

Are there special fetus "sizers" I am supposed to keep by my toilet?

Do they send you home with them from the hospital when they tell you your fetus is not viable and send you home to deliver the miscarriage at home instead of giving you a D + C?

Does it say "If the fetus/products of conception fit through this hole, OK to dispose of on your own; if they are larger than this hole, you must call a funeral home?"

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you read other news articles, this woman attempted to flush the dead fetus, but it got lodged in the toilet, so she used a plunger, unsuccessfully.


Link? I haven’t seen this in any of the articles I’ve read.

It’s in the article linked in the OP.


Sorry. I meant the part about the toilet being removed.

https://www.tribtoday.com/news/local-news/2023/11/womans-abuse-of-corpse-case-heads-to-grand-jury/


OK, so the stillbirth fetus got stuck in the pipes, and probably a plumber had to be called, and that's why the police got involved.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I looked up the definition of a stillbirth and the WHO says it’s 28 weeks. So, unless Ohio has a different legal definition this was a miscarriage.

Heartbreaking, but legally not the same.


Do miscarriage remains have to be disposed of in a particular way? Are they treated differently than stillborn remains?


I looked that up too.
CDC says 20 weeks.
WHO says 28 weeks.
UK says 24 weeks.

Hardly "common knowledge"



Her lawyer:
Timko argues that no law requires a mother suffering from a miscarriage of a non-viable fetus to bury or cremate the remains.
“Women miscarry into toilets everyday. If the state of Ohio expects these women to fish those remains from the toilet and deliver them to a hospital, funeral home or crematorium, the laws need changed,” Timko said, adding that “we aren’t there yet.”

Hopefully the grand jury will decline to indict.

The average weight of a 22 week old fetus is 11 ounces. Think of a pint bottle of milk and then imagine something less than 3/4 that bottle in size, and fishing it out of the bloody toilet bowl.





Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!


I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.


Very sorry about your baby. At least you had the luxury of being in a hospital to receive care, painkillers, deliver her on a bed, and where a nurse cleaned and dressed her to give back you to to hold. That is right and proper.

No one sent you home to deliver your preemie into a toilet with the expectations of you having fish it out with your own hand amidst all the blood, clots, uterine tissue, placenta, fecal matter, urine, and toilet paper in the water.

When you've experienced that horror story, without having any spouse or friendly faces next to you to help you out, come back and tell us about how we are all inhuman for supporting a woman who did go through it.


Oh, but they did send me home. Ten hours later when the baby was actually coming, I went back. After dropping a ton of blood in the toilet, experiencing the unbearable pain of childbirth, I still had the wherewithal to go back.


Oh but did you immediately stick your hands in your toilet and fish around with them to see if a fetus fell in there?


You wouldn't know, because you haven't been through it. When delivering a baby at 22 weeks you are quite sure when the baby comes out. It is an incredibly painful process, like any unmedicated labor. And were it to come out and land in a toilet with a lot of blood, you still cannot miss it. It is the size of a small doll. It is not, as many people here want to believe, some ball of goo. It is a baby. I have pictures of mine. She could not possibly have not seen it and yes, it would be very very easy to "fish" it out and wrap it in a towel, as any caring, loving mother would. I have been through it. You have not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I looked up the definition of a stillbirth and the WHO says it’s 28 weeks. So, unless Ohio has a different legal definition this was a miscarriage.

Heartbreaking, but legally not the same.


Do miscarriage remains have to be disposed of in a particular way? Are they treated differently than stillborn remains?


A baby at 22 weeks gestation is not the same as a first-term miscarriage. This is what those of you who haven't been through do not understand. It's sad. So many of us go through trials in life and delivering a non-viable baby is something many of us have endured. I held and told my baby I loved her. In a million years, despite the pain, shock, and sadness of what I was going through would I ever have dreamed of flushing it down the toilet. It's very sad for this woman. Going through hard times in life does not excuse disgusting behavior. Maybe it doesn't need to be a felony, but she needs to be investigated. Because it isn't normal, ethical, human behavior to flush a baby at 22 weeks gestation down the toilet. Again, if you haven't delivered or seen one in person, you simply can't understand.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!


I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.


Very sorry about your baby. At least you had the luxury of being in a hospital to receive care, painkillers, deliver her on a bed, and where a nurse cleaned and dressed her to give back you to to hold. That is right and proper.

No one sent you home to deliver your preemie into a toilet with the expectations of you having fish it out with your own hand amidst all the blood, clots, uterine tissue, placenta, fecal matter, urine, and toilet paper in the water.

When you've experienced that horror story, without having any spouse or friendly faces next to you to help you out, come back and tell us about how we are all inhuman for supporting a woman who did go through it.


Oh, but they did send me home. Ten hours later when the baby was actually coming, I went back. After dropping a ton of blood in the toilet, experiencing the unbearable pain of childbirth, I still had the wherewithal to go back.


Oh but did you immediately stick your hands in your toilet and fish around with them to see if a fetus fell in there?


You wouldn't know, because you haven't been through it. When delivering a baby at 22 weeks you are quite sure when the baby comes out. It is an incredibly painful process, like any unmedicated labor. And were it to come out and land in a toilet with a lot of blood, you still cannot miss it. It is the size of a small doll. It is not, as many people here want to believe, some ball of goo. It is a baby. I have pictures of mine. She could not possibly have not seen it and yes, it would be very very easy to "fish" it out and wrap it in a towel, as any caring, loving mother would. I have been through it. You have not.


So you didn’t have to stick your hand into a toilet bowel full of blood, uterine lining, stools, urine, and clumps of toilet paper to pull out a dead fetus. But you want a loving mother award for saying you absolutely would have done so. Fine I’ll give you that. Knowing of course that we all can say how brave we’d be in the trenches.

There are many humans out there who might even be loving mothers who would be completely freaked out at the thought of sticking their hand into such a mess. Especially if they were in shock at just having that all pass out of their body and without any pain relief.

Also, it’s okay for women not to have maternal feelings. It really is. I know you want to judge this woman whom you don’t even know for not being enough of a loving mother but not everyone has the same feelings you do toward pregnancy. I’ve had friends who felt relief at their miscarriage. They are not monsters. They are humans with different lives than you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I looked up the definition of a stillbirth and the WHO says it’s 28 weeks. So, unless Ohio has a different legal definition this was a miscarriage.

Heartbreaking, but legally not the same.


Do miscarriage remains have to be disposed of in a particular way? Are they treated differently than stillborn remains?


A baby at 22 weeks gestation is not the same as a first-term miscarriage. This is what those of you who haven't been through do not understand. It's sad. So many of us go through trials in life and delivering a non-viable baby is something many of us have endured. I held and told my baby I loved her. In a million years, despite the pain, shock, and sadness of what I was going through would I ever have dreamed of flushing it down the toilet. It's very sad for this woman. Going through hard times in life does not excuse disgusting behavior. Maybe it doesn't need to be a felony, but she needs to be investigated. Because it isn't normal, ethical, human behavior to flush a baby at 22 weeks gestation down the toilet. Again, if you haven't delivered or seen one in person, you simply can't understand.


How about if she is given help rather than harassed by an investigation.

Why don’t you get it that your experience of giving birth in a hospital probably with your husband or partner next to you holding your hand and a nurse tenderly wiping your brow is NOT the same experience of a woman who went twice to a hospital and was not admitted going home and passing her pregnancy alone in a bathroom? You don’t even know if it was 22 weeks. It might have been 20. It might have been 19 if her periods were irregular. You are not her. It’s incredible you went through such sorrow and have no compassion for another woman.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!


I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.


Very sorry about your baby. At least you had the luxury of being in a hospital to receive care, painkillers, deliver her on a bed, and where a nurse cleaned and dressed her to give back you to to hold. That is right and proper.

No one sent you home to deliver your preemie into a toilet with the expectations of you having fish it out with your own hand amidst all the blood, clots, uterine tissue, placenta, fecal matter, urine, and toilet paper in the water.

When you've experienced that horror story, without having any spouse or friendly faces next to you to help you out, come back and tell us about how we are all inhuman for supporting a woman who did go through it.


Oh, but they did send me home. Ten hours later when the baby was actually coming, I went back. After dropping a ton of blood in the toilet, experiencing the unbearable pain of childbirth, I still had the wherewithal to go back.


Oh but did you immediately stick your hands in your toilet and fish around with them to see if a fetus fell in there?


You wouldn't know, because you haven't been through it. When delivering a baby at 22 weeks you are quite sure when the baby comes out. It is an incredibly painful process, like any unmedicated labor. And were it to come out and land in a toilet with a lot of blood, you still cannot miss it. It is the size of a small doll. It is not, as many people here want to believe, some ball of goo. It is a baby. I have pictures of mine. She could not possibly have not seen it and yes, it would be very very easy to "fish" it out and wrap it in a towel, as any caring, loving mother would. I have been through it. You have not.


A 14 week fetus also looks like a baby. Can women flush that or is that a felony?

You’re arguing that a woman should *go to jail* because she did not experience and react to her stillbirth the same way you did. Jail for every woman who does not conform to your belief about what “any caring, loving mother would do.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's pretty clear this prosecution is about getting a case on the record that gives personhood to a 2nd trimester fetus.

Yup. So a DEAD second trimester fetus will have more rights to its bodily autonomy than a living human woman. MAGA!


I love all you people coming on here who have never held a second-trimester fetus. Once it is outside the uterus it is no longer a fetus, it is a baby. I held my 22 week baby, the nurse dressed her, and took photos. Yes, that baby is worth the dignity of not being flushed down the toilet. It has nothing to do with being "MAGA," it has to do with being a mother. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, human about flushing a baby down the toilet. You haven't seen a baby outside the uterus at that stage of gestation, so I suggest you keep your small-minded, uninformed opinion to yourself.


Very sorry about your baby. At least you had the luxury of being in a hospital to receive care, painkillers, deliver her on a bed, and where a nurse cleaned and dressed her to give back you to to hold. That is right and proper.

No one sent you home to deliver your preemie into a toilet with the expectations of you having fish it out with your own hand amidst all the blood, clots, uterine tissue, placenta, fecal matter, urine, and toilet paper in the water.

When you've experienced that horror story, without having any spouse or friendly faces next to you to help you out, come back and tell us about how we are all inhuman for supporting a woman who did go through it.


Oh, but they did send me home. Ten hours later when the baby was actually coming, I went back. After dropping a ton of blood in the toilet, experiencing the unbearable pain of childbirth, I still had the wherewithal to go back.


Oh but did you immediately stick your hands in your toilet and fish around with them to see if a fetus fell in there?


You wouldn't know, because you haven't been through it. When delivering a baby at 22 weeks you are quite sure when the baby comes out. It is an incredibly painful process, like any unmedicated labor. And were it to come out and land in a toilet with a lot of blood, you still cannot miss it. It is the size of a small doll. It is not, as many people here want to believe, some ball of goo. It is a baby. I have pictures of mine. She could not possibly have not seen it and yes, it would be very very easy to "fish" it out and wrap it in a towel, as any caring, loving mother would. I have been through it. You have not.


So you didn’t have to stick your hand into a toilet bowel full of blood, uterine lining, stools, urine, and clumps of toilet paper to pull out a dead fetus. But you want a loving mother award for saying you absolutely would have done so. Fine I’ll give you that. Knowing of course that we all can say how brave we’d be in the trenches.

There are many humans out there who might even be loving mothers who would be completely freaked out at the thought of sticking their hand into such a mess. Especially if they were in shock at just having that all pass out of their body and without any pain relief.

Also, it’s okay for women not to have maternal feelings. It really is. I know you want to judge this woman whom you don’t even know for not being enough of a loving mother but not everyone has the same feelings you do toward pregnancy. I’ve had friends who felt relief at their miscarriage. They are not monsters. They are humans with different lives than you.


She already knew the baby was dead, likely needed to clean up the only bathroom in the house, was physically in pain and possibly bleeding heavily… the fact that anyone can judge her action at all as being “uncaring” or “unethical” is simply astonishing to me.

When my baby was born he wasn’t breathing well. He needed to go to the NICU for observation but the midwife tried to get me to hold him first. I was totally horrified and panicked and refused, said “get him out of here” because if they were saying he needed the NICU I did not want to see or touch him - I wanted him in the NICU. Then everyone cleared out of the L&D room instantly and left me alone. I was totally out of my mind from the stress & meds - I did not really get what was happening and probably appeared happy. I didn’t even think to ask to see my DS until a nurse came and got me 4 hrs later to nurse him. I wonder if somone seeing these reactions would say I was an uncaring mother and should have the baby taken away?
Anonymous
Unless the Ohio penal code spells out the exact point in pregnancy where you can no longer dispose of the products of conception or a deceased embryo or fetus, I don’t see how a jury could convict her. Does Ohio law establish the moment that a fetus attains personhood? Does a deceased fetus attain personhood status even before the point viability for living fetuses? If so, how could anyone reasonably know at what point in gestation that occurs?

This absurd case is extremely problematic legally. She probably can’t be convicted on the merits of the case and it’s a travesty to convict her based on emotions. This is abuse of our legal system to target a grieving woman for political points. It’s beyond the pale.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She is not being charged with having a stillborn. She is being charged for abuse of a corpse for leaving the dead baby in the toilet.

Still stupid. She had a miscarriage. The "baby" was never alive. She was probably not feeling great, confused, panicked, etc. There was likely blood, she didn't know what to do. Hell, maybe it was too slippery to pick up. Maybe she felt faint. Why the hell should someone be subjected to criminal prosecution for this?


Because most of the people in this world hate women.


Because she is not subject to criminal prosecution for that. Not alive baby is a corpse, and you cannot just disasamble any dead body the way you feel like (to chop it in the pieces and put it in the freezer or to flush it in the toilet). That what she is charged with.


So you think this should be prosecuted as a felony?


If that state has this law, then yes, it should be prosecuted. We cannot just disregard the law. If there will be evidence that she is incompetent to stand a trial or that she was in such condition that she was not understanding what she is doing, then the judge or jury should find her not guilty. We cannot just let all criminals walk around just because we disagree with the law. If we want to follow the rule of law, then we have to follow the legal process.


Hope you are prepared to start investigating a lot of women then.


And I hope that the PP takes the lead in researching all of the different laws throughout the US — as well as noting the places that likely have no relevant laws — and prepares inserts that can be attached to period products so that everyone impacted by these laws will have the opportunity to know how they might potentially be impacted.

PP — when “rule of law” means what mostly white, mostly male, mostly Fundamentalist Christian lawmakers seek to impose on the rest of us, it really is ok to stop venerating its validity.

I’m Black and female and old enough to get that the “rule of law” can be deliberately abused— and really isn’t the same thing as justice.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: