Woman charged with felony for having a stillbirth

[Anonymous]

so the staff at the hospital should be facing any felony charges this woman faces.

+1 the mishandling of the corpse began when she was denied a D&C.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Woman charged with felony for trying to clean up a 22-week stillbirth at home after being refused care at a hospital.

https://www.wkbn.com/news/local-news/warren-n...buse-of-corpse-case/

Ridiculous…all the quotes are from men, including one who said she “put” the fetus in the toilet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why'd she leave it in the toilet?

Because she was in shock and there is no place to “drop of” dead babies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why we need to have a legal system not run by ignorant misogynist men who think women have cooties have babies are delivered by the stork.

+1

WTF?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Woman charged with felony for trying to clean up a 22-week stillbirth at home after being refused care at a hospital.

https://www.wkbn.com/news/local-news/warren-n...buse-of-corpse-case/

Ridiculous…all the quotes are from men, including one who said she “put” the fetus in the toilet.

“She went on with her day”

[Anonymous]

She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

Of course the context matters. Her state of mind and circumstances are very relevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

Of course the context matters. Her state of mind and circumstances are very relevant.

State of mind is relevant to most of the crimes. It does not mean that she did not commit the crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

It does actually matter, context, always matters when talking about committing a crime.

If somebody holds a gun into your head and makes you stab somebody, you’re not as culpable, as if you plan and execute a murder.

The state that she lives in for her to carry dead baby in her body, which would cause psychos, they denied her healthcare and forced her to give birth in a toilet.

So yeah, it matters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

Of course the context matters. Her state of mind and circumstances are very relevant.

State of mind is relevant to most of the crimes. It does not mean that she did not commit the crime.

Yes, it does. It literally could mean she did not commit a crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

Of course the context matters. Her state of mind and circumstances are very relevant.

State of mind is relevant to most of the crimes. It does not mean that she did not commit the crime.

It’s not clear if a non-viable baby is legally a “corpse”. Either way, they never should have charged her given the context.

[Anonymous]

I am a woman who delivered two babies at 20 weeks and I can promise you, that woman did not sit on the toilet and just pop that dead baby out into the toilet and surprisingly hear a splash. Delivering a baby at that term, dead or alive, is every bit as painful as a full-term delivery--I know this, as I have done both, multiple times. You don't just go, oh, I have to pee, and then, hey what was that splash, oh, a baby! Then flush. This wasn't shock. This was foul play. She tried to flush a dead baby down the toilet. And everyone here knows why but won't say. She was very likely covering up a dead baby who had drugs in its system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not charged with felony for having a stillbirth. The subject of this thread is pure propaganda. She charged with abusing a dead body. Does not matter where the body came from (she hit is with the car, she killed the person, or she came across the dead body on the hike).

Of course the context matters. Her state of mind and circumstances are very relevant.

State of mind is relevant to most of the crimes. It does not mean that she did not commit the crime.

It’s not clear if a non-viable baby is legally a “corpse”. Either way, they never should have charged her given the context.

It is. They issue death certificates for non-term babies. I know, because mine were issued death certificates (which I did think was odd, considering they weren't issued birth certificates).

[Anonymous]

She was very likely covering up a dead baby who had drugs in its system.

WTF? You think people from Ohio are all drug abusers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

so the staff at the hospital should be facing any felony charges this woman faces.

+1 the mishandling of the corpse began when she was denied a D&C.

Where does it say she was denied a D&C? There is no information whatsoever about her decisions and these supposed trips to the hospital. We have no idea what happened on those visits.