Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile

Trump has nothing more to say about his best friend Kirk

But have you seen his bestest ever ballroom?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?”

The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself.

It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left?

Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.

Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.

Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.

Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.

Well Charlie would still be alive today playing with his babies if we focused more on the above.

+1
You reap what you sow. And the "reaping" isn't always accompanied by good people or a socially palatable method. Reaping doesn't mean deserving, it means natural, unsurprising consequence, note the distinction.

Not sure what country or time period you live in but in NO ONE’s law book, govt, or faith is it “natural and unsurprising” to unilaterally decide shoot someone down for what they have said in public forums. Or private ones.

That’s anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, not to mention unethical, illegal and immoral in most religions and societies.

— Note the distinction of your illogic and falsities. And zero understanding of due process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk’s alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was reportedly living with a transgender partner before the attack.
Erika rightfully referred to Tyler as "they"

How so? There is no allegation that Robinson is trans. The allegation is about his roommate.

News reports suggest his roommate was his companion and partner.

All the news reports are based on leaks to one reporter. Assuming it is true, an assumption that I am not willing to make, that would not make Robinson trans. Are you sure that you know what a trans person is?

At first it sounded to wild to be true. But more and more news outlets are now reporting this- seems likely it is true

I'll wait until all the "more and more news outlets" reporting it aren't Murdoch owned/adjacent, Fox-related outlets. Entirely possible it turns out to be accurate, but the pictures of the roommate posted so far at the Daily Mail link previously ( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15095195/tyler-robinson-roommate-text-messages-cops-arrest-utah.html ) don't appear to someone transitioning (at least not publicly).

That looks like a trans person to me- if it is the roommate

Why would a supposedly trans person tip off police about the killing of Charlie Kirk? Weren't the trans people all supposed to be cheering and celebrating his death?

Sorry MAGA but the narratives just don't line up.

He didn’t tip off the police. The FBI came to him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

We want gun control for starters.

Just remember Charlie could be here tonight reading Goodnight Moon to his kids.

Trans or not, he probably still would be if Robinson wasn't raised in a gun-obsessed family.

Yes trans is irrelevant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin Tyler Robinson lived with transgender partner: source

https://nypost.com/2025/09/13/us-news/charlie-kirk-shooter-tyler-robinson-lived-with-transgender-partner/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=nypost

WASHINGTON — Charlie Kirk’s alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was living with a transgender partner who was in the process of transitioning from a male to a female, a law enforcement source confirmed to The Post Saturday.

That individual, who has yet to be identified by the authorities, is now fully cooperating with the FBI on its investigation into the fatal shooting of the conservative activist, the source added. The relationship was first reported by Fox News’ Brooke Singman.

Text messages and other communications that the transgender individual traded with Robinson, 22, helped the feds nab the accused assassin.

Is this just more miscommunication. I thought it was the father who talked him into turning himself to the authorities.

Governor Cox said during the press conference that police had contacted Robinson's "roommate" who had shown them Discord messages. By then, the police had already been informed of Robinson's admission that he had killed Kirk. The claims in the Post are inaccurate and should cast doubt on the rest of the article.

I can’t believe Singman still has a job (well it’s Fox so I guess I can.) One of her other “exclusives” involved allegations by an FBI informant that Joe and Hunter Biden accepted bribes from a Ukrainian energy company. Those claims were completely false and the FBI later charged the informant Alexander Smirnov with lying to the FBI. He was convicted and sentenced to six years in prison.

Right wing media figures are paid to spread divisive disinformation, including on behalf of Russia. This was in the news one year ago almost to the date.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/07/nx-s1-5101895/doj-says-russia-paid-right-wing-influencers-to-spread-russian-propaganda

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

We want gun control for starters.

Just remember Charlie could be here tonight reading Goodnight Moon to his kids.

Trans or not, he probably still would be if Robinson wasn't raised in a gun-obsessed family.

Yes trans is irrelevant.

Have you been on reddit lately? I doubt it. I can only imagine what's going on discord. It's relevant. Very.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s amusing to me that people are trying to id this nut’s party affiliation. Just like Pelosi’s attacker, he probably is all over the place politically and hard to pin that. It’s hard to expect coherent political stance from someone clearly mental

Gee too bad Trump was crazy enough to label the killer before he was found.

The leader of the U.S. siccing his pack of nuts on Progressives.

Too bad. I'd like open season on Mormons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:350+ pages, most are which consists of posts trying to convince everyone that the shooter was far right MAGA.

And like most of the lies told by the Democrat left, this one is now going down in flames.

There was nothing flammable to begin with. Just a bunch of leftist BS. Small small % of people. They have nothing else to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Who were turning point financial backers?

They don't need any. The pool of mouth breathing uneducated bigots who will believe anything is huge in this country.

Why is it so hard for people to be kind these days?

Because leftists are losing power rapidly and the masks are off

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

We want gun control for starters.

Just remember Charlie could be here tonight reading Goodnight Moon to his kids.

Trans or not, he probably still would be if Robinson wasn't raised in a gun-obsessed family.

Yes trans is irrelevant.

Have you been on reddit lately? I doubt it. I can only imagine what's going on discord. It's relevant. Very.

It’s irrelevant to sane people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

We want gun control for starters.

Just remember Charlie could be here tonight reading Goodnight Moon to his kids.

Trans or not, he probably still would be if Robinson wasn't raised in a gun-obsessed family.

Yes trans is irrelevant.

It's wild how the right wing has seized on this distorted "violent trans shooters" narrative when the fact is less than 0.1% of mass shootings in the last 10 years were committed by transpeople. Straight white males are far more of a danger for committing mass shootings than trans people.

That is an absolute fact. Any right wing pundit yammering about "trans shooters" is peddling outright distortions and disinfo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's disgusting how all of these people professing to be so angered and distraught over the shooting of Charlie Kirk have

JACK SHIT

to say about any of the other violent, ideologically motivated shootings going on, like the one in Colorado.

https://coloradosun.com/2025/09/12/evergreen-high-school-shooting-suspect-social-media/

You people are dishonest, disingenuous and full of crap.

Did any victims die? No

Did anyone famous in a natl scale die? No.

How many people get shot and killed daily in America? With or without gang on gang shootings?

CO boy was a social media influenced shooter who injured two and then killed himself.

Do you want him to get more attention so other troubled young men do the same? Or what do you want?

We want gun control for starters.

Just remember Charlie could be here tonight reading Goodnight Moon to his kids.

Trans or not, he probably still would be if Robinson wasn't raised in a gun-obsessed family.

Yes trans is irrelevant.

Have you been on reddit lately? I doubt it. I can only imagine what's going on discord. It's relevant. Very.

It’s irrelevant to sane people.

Ok. Let's give it a couple it a weeks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Who were turning point financial backers?

They don't need any. The pool of mouth breathing uneducated bigots who will believe anything is huge in this country.

Why is it so hard for people to be kind these days?

Because leftists are losing power rapidly and the masks are off

Who tf cares about left or right? Can someone, any non brainwashed person enforce gun control? Anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok so assuming the roommate was trans and he was in a relationship with this person what are the implications of that?

It could be the motive. Shooter had a trans gf and went off the deep end bc he didn’t like what Charlie had to say about affirming gender.

Well Charlie knew that risk and accepted it. He said gun deaths were acceptable.

Not sure what your point is? He wouldn’t have changed his stance on the second amendment over this. He wasn’t afraid to die. Have you watched any of his videos?

Wrong. Conservatives don't care about a thing until it directly affects them. And that's when the smart, non-crazy ones wake up.

Then again you could be right and Charlie Kirk was crazy?

Ok so the answer is no, you haven’t watched any of his videos.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Who were turning point financial backers?

They don't need any. The pool of mouth breathing uneducated bigots who will believe anything is huge in this country.

Why is it so hard for people to be kind these days?

Because leftists are losing power rapidly and the masks are off

Au contraire

The rights are trying to cling to an unpopular platform and the masks are on, evidently