Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.


It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.


He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.


Agree.

I hope some social media regulations and bans come out of this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:He grew up in a rural, conservative Christian, MAGA, gun-loving household, posing with automatic weapons for Facebook pictures, attended one semester at a conservative college before moving back to his home town, immersed since his teenage years in an alt-right tinged gaming culture ... and people want to blame the trans roommate who turned him in???



That’s not what’s going on here nor supported by the investigation the last three days.
Wake up PP.
The radicalization that happened to Tyler was online and with whomever he was hanging out with the last few years was irrational and desensitized to killing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



Yeah so.

Blackhawk crash into the commercial jet investigation also wasn’t loudly released,’mainly bc the pilot at the controls had a terrible flying record and performance reviews.


That crash had nothing to do with it. The deranged right wing ran full tilt spreading false information about the pilot, and to this day apparently some on the right still believe it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lots of pages about just one of the 46,700 gun deaths in the US each year, all of them preventable.


No.

The issue is should an individual gun down a public figure he doesn’t like.


No but at least he didn’t fire rapidly and indiscriminately into the crowd. Could have been so much worse thanks to lax gun laws and gun culture.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.


It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.


He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.


Where are you getting this from? This sounds completely made up.


I’d start with the questioner guy and timing of the shot. And the leftist campus speaker from two weeks ago rallying for exactly this to happen at Kirk’s event.

Somehow everyone involved was stupid enough to post that too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.


It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.


He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.


Agree.

I hope some social media regulations and bans come out of this.


If it helps curb some of the false info that FOX, OAN, Newsmax and others have been spreading then fine.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s like we are living in bizarro world.

Why is the right so intent on destroying the US? I don’t get it.

It’s disturbing that our kids have to grow up in this shtshow.



Certainly bizarre that you find peaceful vigils for an passionate public figure to be bizarre.

Ah yes ! The racist is now being rebranded as passionate public figure. Unlike confederate generals, there are videos of your racist hero that will live forever. Future generations wouldn't see him for anything but the loser he was.


Case in point: the following video of CK calling for the incarceration or death penalty for Joe Biden. Around the 1:20 mark.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.


It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.


He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.


Agree.

I hope some social media regulations and bans come out of this.


It’s all part of one hate ecosystem, and Section 230 keeps us from holding the social media companies accountable. I’ve always thought that was a good thing because it facilitates freedom of speech, but now it’s just being used to stifle speech and spread hate.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-you-should-know-about-section-230-the-rule-that-shaped-todays-internet
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Kirk made disparaging remarks about a number of groups. If the shooter’s roommate/romantic partner were black, would MAGA be claiming black people are to blame for the shooting?


Tyler and any accomplices who encouraged the killing or knew about are the blame.

Everyone knows that, no matter how much garbage you keep posting here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s transsexual mean?


It means that someone is medically transitioning to change the primary and/or secondary sex characteristics.

Most people these days just use the term transgender even though technically it’s an umbrella term for anyone whose gender identity doesn’t match their sex assigned at birth. Someone could go by they/them and take no hormones, have no surgery, not change their name, etc and call themselves transgender.

So transgender includes all transexual people but transexual doesn’t include all transgender people. At this point, transexual is rarely used outside of medical terminology or for very specific reasons within the community.


What does transexual relationship mean?


I don’t know, I’ve never heard of that phrase and I’m trans. As I mentioned, transexual is basically a medical term these days. It’s like asking what is a breast augmentation relationship?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/13/kirk-suspect-transgender-roommate



So investigators have known about the trans roommate/romantic partner and kept it confidential.


It also doesn't fit the right wing narrative that transgender people are violent and cheered and celebrated Kirk's shooting. Yet here is a supposed trans person who was the one to turn the shooter in. The narratives on the right still don't add up.


He’s trying to save his own skin. It’s coming out now that there is a group of 7-20 of them who knew about this and played some role. All trans and/or heavy gamers.


Agree.

I hope some social media regulations and bans come out of this.


The irony here is that Charlie Kirk used and weaponized social media radicalization, for right wing causes.
The irony here is that Charlie Kirk said some gun deaths are acceptable losses, and now he's one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Charlie Kirk was garbage a con man that is clear

Any other narrative is put out by the cult of stupidity

He was anti American
He should have been in jail did his role in Jan 6

There is nothing one Republican can say to defend the idolizing of a man that literally scammed hard working Americans with his daily lives.

Republicans wear AR 15 pins daily the shooting is on them it was a home grown white Christian nationalist woo hoo maga another one of your killing one of yours.

Now Ben Shapiro will take Kirk’s place if you give him your money I hope you rot


Thx for posting your personal opinion. It’s been noted.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:He grew up in a rural, conservative Christian, MAGA, gun-loving household, posing with automatic weapons for Facebook pictures, attended one semester at a conservative college before moving back to his home town, immersed since his teenage years in an alt-right tinged gaming culture ... and people want to blame the trans roommate who turned him in???



That’s not what’s going on here nor supported by the investigation the last three days.
Wake up PP.
The radicalization that happened to Tyler was online and with whomever he was hanging out with the last few years was irrational and desensitized to killing.


Of course, we just have to filter out the insane trans preoccupation of right if we ever want to get anywhere. Their psycho sexual obsessions are an anchor.
Anonymous
And the leftist campus speaker from two weeks ago rallying for exactly this to happen at Kirk’s event.

What?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

(Warning: long rant)

My liberal friends are completely oblivious about how radicalizing the last week has been for tens of millions of normal Americans. Zero clue.

I’m not talking about people who are “online”; I mean regular, everyday Americans. “Normies.” People who scroll through Facebook posts and Instagram reels from the Dutch Bros drive thru line. Political moderates who have water cooler chats about Mahomes touchdowns and Bon Jovi concerts, not Twitter threads or Rachel Maddow monologues.

Millions of them. Tens of millions. They’re logging on, they’re engaging, and they’re furious.

And I’ll be candid: They blame you guys. They blame the left.

Regardless of whether you believe it to be justified, they think you’re the bad guys here. And they are reacting accordingly.

I can already hear some of you racing toward the comments to start screeching in moral indignation, so I’m going to be blunt: Shut up and listen to what I’m telling you. Your movement will lose any semblance of relevance if you don’t develop some small measure of self-awareness, and—absent someone force-feeding you bitter medicine—you guys collectively lack the humility to do this on your own.

Here are the facts:

Fact 1. Tens of millions of Americans started the week seeing a 23-year-old blonde woman—a young woman in whom virtually every parent watching pictured their own daughter—stabbed in the neck by a career criminal. These people then found out the murderer had been released from jail 14 times over.

Fact 2. Two days later, tens of millions of Americans watched a video of Charlie Kirk get murdered speaking to college students. Millions of these people knew who Charlie was; millions of them didn’t. Upon seeing the video, however, these normal Americans from across the land and across the political spectrum agreed that he was the victim of a terrible, fundamentally unjustifiable crime, and their hearts broke in sympathy for his family. Good people who had never even heard the name Charlie Kirk before wept.

Fact 3. Immediately after seeing the footage of a peaceful young man get shot in the neck, these same people logged onto Facebook and Instagram (remember, we are talking about regular Americans, not perpetually online Twitter or Bluesky users) and saw some of their local nurses, school teachers, college administrators, and retail workers celebrating this horrific crime. Not just defending it, but cheering it.

These are all facts. You may not like the implications of these facts, and we can certainly debate the underlying causes thereof, but, indisputably, they are nevertheless factual statements.

Here’s what it means for you, the Democrats reading this:

These normal, middle-of-the-road, non-political citizens just become politically active. They realized that politics cares about them, even if they don’t particularly care about politics. After watching Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk both bleed out from the neck, they think their lives and the physical safety of their families—the bedrock of human society, the foundation of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs—depend on political activation, whether they desire it or not.

These people are now sprinting—not jogging, not walking, but racing—to the right. Because they blame you guys for everything that just happened.

When they see footage of Decarlos Brown stabbing a Ukrainian refugee to death, they don’t see just one demon-possessed man. They picture every university administrator, HR bureaucrat, and DEI apparatchik that ever lectured them about systemic racism, the “carceral state,” or the need to release violent crime suspects without bail in the name of social justice.

They then think back to conversations they’ve had with their cop friends—their buddy from high school who quit the force after getting tired of being called a racist, their friend at the local YMCA who vents about having to release career criminals because Soros-funded prosecutors aren’t willing to file charges—and they realize everything the left has told them over the last five years has been utter bullshit.

And they blame you. Because, even if you count yourself as a moderate Democrat, your party supported the district attorneys, city council members, and mayors that let fictitious concerns about mental health and racial justice supersede very real concerns for their family’s safety.

When these Americans see blood erupt from the side of Charlie Kirk’s neck, they don’t see just a martyred political activist. They think of every extreme leftist they’ve ever met who (1) calls anyone to the right of Hillary Clinton a fascist and (2) constantly jokes—“jokes”—about punching Nazis and “bashing the fash.”

They realize that there really do exist people who wish to see them dead for their moderately conservative political beliefs, their Christian faith, and even the color of their skin. They ask themselves if the violence visited upon Charlie might one day show up on their own doorstep.

And they blame you. Because, even if you’re just a center-of-the-road liberal, you lacked the courage to police your own ranks. You let modern-day Maoist red guards run loose across every facet of society, and what started with social-media struggle sessions has now turned to 30-06 bullet holes.

When these Americans log onto social media and see their neighbors justifying, celebrating, glorifying murder, they realize that some who walk among them are soulless ghouls at best, literally demon-possessed at worst. These people—whether they faithfully attend church every Sunday or only attend with relatives once a year, on Christmas Eve—start talking about things like spiritual warfare. They implicitly understand that no normal human casually celebrates the mortal demise of a peaceful person.

And they blame you. Because, even if you condemned Charlie Kirk’s murder, they probably haven’t seen you condemn those in your own movement who cheered it on. They view you as complicit in allowing heartless fellow travelers to celebrate death, and it repulses them.

For all of these situations, what has your response been? Nothing but bullshit.

In response to Iryna Zarutska bleeding out on the floor of a train, you post bullshit statistics about reductions in reported crime, when everyone who’s ever been to a major urban center in the last decade knows that actual crime has skyrocketed, only for victims not to waste their time reporting it to cops that don’t have the manpower to respond and prosecutors that seek to downgrade as many felonies as possible to misdemeanor citations.

In response to a 31-year-old man taking a bullet to the neck in front of his family, you post nothing but bullshit whataboutism.

> “What about January 6th?” (Honest answer: After you let Liz Cheney spend two years operating a star chamber in the House, combined with countless other failed attempts at “lawfare” against Trump, no one cares anymore.)

> “What about Mike Lee making a dumb joke on Twitter about some guy in a mask in Minnesota?” (No one outside of Utah, DC, or Twitter knows who Mike Lee even is.)

> “What about Paul Pelosi?” (That’s not comparable to Charlie Kirk getting shot, and we all know it. And, again, Paul who?)

> “What about regulations on assault rifles?” (That’s not going to get you very far when one of these killers used a knife and the other one used a common hunting rifle.)

In response to teachers, healthcare workers, and thousands of other liberals cheering on Charlie’s murder, it’s nothing but more bullshit and misdirection.

> “It’s not THAT many people celebrating!” (Yes, it is. Everyone has seen it on their Facebook and Instagram feeds.)

> “I thought you guys didn’t support cancel culture.” (We don’t cancel people over their opinions; we’re more than happy to see people lose their jobs—especially their taxpayer-funded jobs—for actively cheering on murder, though. If you can’t see the difference, that’s your own shortcoming.)

All bullshit. Not even smart bullshit, but stale, mid-grade, low-IQ bullshit. Ordinary Americans see right through it, and they don’t like how it smells.

You probably don’t like hearing this. But you need to hear it.

Because I’m right, and, as you reflect on this, you know I’m right. The ranks of my political movement gained millions of righteously angry new members this week. We have a mandate to ensure these crimes never happen again, and that’s exactly what we are now going to do.

If you want to keep a seat at the table as we do so, you’d better clean house and start policing your own.


Whatever. Kirk was killed by Kirk's ideology. Go cry somewhere


No.
Kirk was assassinated by a radicalized, failure to launch, chronically online gamer who plotted out the murder and did it.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: