Man asked woman to leash her dog in a public park -- she called the police on him

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if that man is happy she got fired from her job. Or his sister.

Probably... he did this on purpose. Why else did he have dog treats ready to go.

Do you really think he brought dog treats to the park when he was birdwatching for the sole purpose to find a white lady to film and get fired from her job?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love to jog at the park near my home, but I'm always a little leary of the off leash dogs. I've been knocked over by a few. The idea of using dog treats to give me some control over the situation is brilliant. If you can't understand why he would have them, you're an idiot.

It really is. I'm going to bring handfuls to throw out when there are off leash dogs on paths in Alexandria now. Brilliant idea.

Probably much more effective than pepper spray.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, pp, we all know abt the treats and still think she’s a racist jerk. The story abt what happened prior to recording us not exculpatory.

What on earth happened prior?? What are you assuming or making up, and what is the evidence for your assumptions?

[Anonymous]

Why are people focusing on the dog treats? All you need to know is that she called the police and told them a lie that could've gotten a man killed.

If you're wondering how that could've gotten him killed, then there's no hope for you in this discussion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love to jog at the park near my home, but I'm always a little leary of the off leash dogs. I've been knocked over by a few. The idea of using dog treats to give me some control over the situation is brilliant. If you can't understand why he would have them, you're an idiot.

It really is. I'm going to bring handfuls to throw out when there are off leash dogs on paths in Alexandria now. Brilliant idea.

Probably much more effective than pepper spray.

I had the same reaction. It’s funny that people are so put off by the treats. I read that and thought it was genius. Don’t want your dog coming up to me? Leash it!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are people focusing on the dog treats? All you need to know is that she called the police and told them a lie that could've gotten a man killed.

If you're wondering how that could've gotten him killed, then there's no hope for you in this discussion.

+1. Time to move this to the Minnesota cop killer thread. No way this should be top story anymore. She got fired, she deserved it.

I also hope this makes people in rock creek park start to follow the leash laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are people focusing on the dog treats? All you need to know is that she called the police and told them a lie that could've gotten a man killed.

If you're wondering how that could've gotten him killed, then there's no hope for you in this discussion.

+1. Time to move this to the Minnesota cop killer thread. No way this should be top story anymore. She got fired, she deserved it.

I also hope this makes people in rock creek park start to follow the leash laws.

*killer cop

[Anonymous]

Just imagine if this was a middle-aged white male birdwatcher politely asking a black woman to restrain her unleashed dog, and she got aggressively up in his face and then made a call to police falsely claiming to be in danger.

[Anonymous]

Black man here: I hate the cancel culture and I also hate to see someone lose a successful career because of one mistake. HOWEVER, her actions (lying to the police) could've led to the death of the man at the hands of the police. If the officers were nearby, they would've come with guns drawn at the attacker and we know how that frequently ends. Those of you accusing him of wrongdoing would still be making the same arguments about why he was killed.

In this case, justice was served. I hope she can learn from this but I think her career is over. The position of VP at a Wall Street firm doesn't come up very often...especially during these times.

[Anonymous]

According to Franklin Templeton on Twitter:

Following our internal review of the incident in Central Park yesterday, we have made the decision to terminate the employee involved, effective immediately. We do not tolerate racism of any kind at Franklin Templeton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just imagine if this was a middle-aged white male birdwatcher politely asking a black woman to restrain her unleashed dog, and she got aggressively up in his face and then made a call to police falsely claiming to be in danger.

OK...but that didn't happen. Why don't you imagine it and let us know how it turned out.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to Franklin Templeton on Twitter:

Following our internal review of the incident in Central Park yesterday, we have made the decision to terminate the employee involved, effective immediately. We do not tolerate racism of any kind at Franklin Templeton.

Ummm...that was covered a few pages ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just imagine if this was a middle-aged white male birdwatcher politely asking a black woman to restrain her unleashed dog, and she got aggressively up in his face and then made a call to police falsely claiming to be in danger.

OK...but that didn't happen. Why don't you imagine it and let us know how it turned out.

Sure thing! All the Karen apologists on this thread would be defending the birdwatcher and calling for the arrest of the lady who broke the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Franklin Templeton on Twitter:

Following our internal review of the incident in Central Park yesterday, we have made the decision to terminate the employee involved, effective immediately. We do not tolerate racism of any kind at Franklin Templeton.

Ummm...that was covered a few pages ago.

No. A few pages ago she was put on paid leave. Effective immediately she is fired. Clean out your desk, no benefits, no reference letter, no job.