Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And now he’s saying that the ballroom is going to cost more than he originally claimed it would. Basically what that means is that more corporations will have to step up and pay their tribute to the king or the ones that have already paid up will have to pay additional amounts.
Not your money nor your problem.
It not Donald's house to destroy.
Good, because it wasn't destroyed.
Reality begs to differ, bootlicker.
Mmm, I just checked, the White House is still there.
Whatever you're doing isn't reality.