RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I can't be alone in thinking who cares? Or, that's probably better than leading an army of yahoos to storm the building and film themselves committing felonies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

This is no left wing media in this country. Lots of corporate outlets like MSNBC. Those will push “moderate” democrats but nit really left wing or progressives.

Try mother jones …

This was already listed above. Mother Jones, The Nation and Ms. That’s pretty much the totality of the “liberal media.” Vs NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR, all the major newspapers…

Your problem is that you like biased news. That’s fine, but don’t pretend Mother Jones et al are less biased than Fox News. If MSM peeves the left and right, it is doing its job better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

This is no left wing media in this country. Lots of corporate outlets like MSNBC. Those will push “moderate” democrats but nit really left wing or progressives.

Try mother jones …

This was already listed above. Mother Jones, The Nation and Ms. That’s pretty much the totality of the “liberal media.” Vs NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR, all the major newspapers…

Your problem is that you like biased news. That’s fine, but don’t pretend Mother Jones et al are less biased than Fox News. If MSM peeves the left and right, it is doing its job better.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which outlets do you consider right-wing?
Which outlets do you consider left-wing?

This is no left wing media in this country. Lots of corporate outlets like MSNBC. Those will push “moderate” democrats but nit really left wing or progressives.

Try mother jones …

This was already listed above. Mother Jones, The Nation and Ms. That’s pretty much the totality of the “liberal media.” Vs NBC, CBS, ABC, NPR, all the major newspapers…

Your problem is that you like biased news. That’s fine, but don’t pretend Mother Jones et al are less biased than Fox News. If MSM peeves the left and right, it is doing its job better.

I don’t consume any of those.

Mother Jones is open and up front about their bias; Fox pretends to be unbiased.

And wow you and your little plus one coordinated friend haven’t read anything on this thread. I mean, you can’t. If you manage to take in any new knowledge, your Republican belief system would collapse.

[Anonymous]

The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

[Anonymous]

3.4% seems a little high, actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:3.4% seems a little high, actually.

Who owns the media?
Give you a hint
It’s not journalists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3.4% seems a little high, actually.

Who owns the media?
Give you a hint
It’s not journalists.

If the journalists don't report as their bosses insist, they are fired.
Ask Sage Steele how that works.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.

No babe.
The WSJ opinion pages don’t “lean right”. They drifted off into crank territory after 2016. And it’s a real shame because it besmirches the good name of a formerly great paper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.

No babe.
The WSJ opinion pages don’t “lean right”. They drifted off into crank territory after 2016. And it’s a real shame because it besmirches the good name of a formerly great paper.

Sweetie, if you're gonna lie do it in less an obvious manner. You can say many things about the WSJ, but "crank territory" is certainly not one. You must be projecting your own crank views. Stay sane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.

No babe.
The WSJ opinion pages don’t “lean right”. They drifted off into crank territory after 2016. And it’s a real shame because it besmirches the good name of a formerly great paper.

Sweetie, if you're gonna lie do it in less an obvious manner. You can say many things about the WSJ, but "crank territory" is certainly not one. You must be projecting your own crank views. Stay sane.

DP. “Stay sane”? I see why you don’t have a problem with WSJ’s nutso editorial staff.

“The Journal has a distinctly conservative, finance-focused sensibility; it also belongs squarely among the New York media elite. It is not where many reporters aspire to land, however, in large part because its reputation is so tainted by incendiary op-eds. For decades, the Journal newsroom has grumbled about leaps of logic and reckless ideology on the opinion side. During Trump’s presidency, the grumbling grew into a roar.” https://www.cjr.org/special_report/breaking_right_wall_street_journal_stubborn_murdoch.php

A few examples of absolutely insane WSJ editorials provided in that article include one that suggested that Dr Biden shouldn’t call herself a doctor because she’s not a doctor and a Mike Pence special that there’s no second covid wave. I mean…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WSJ and USA Today are the only real newspapers in the US today.

The rest are propaganda machines. And that includes most TV if not all.

WSJ is right wing.

Only if you believe actual facts and news are right wing.

95% of the paper is a hardcore, objective newspaper, and the few opinion pages (yes, leaning right) are in one section you can simply jump over.

Compare that with the NYT or WaPo, where there's no way to separate facts and news from the (clearly left) opinions everywhere.

No babe.
The WSJ opinion pages don’t “lean right”. They drifted off into crank territory after 2016. And it’s a real shame because it besmirches the good name of a formerly great paper.

Sweetie, if you're gonna lie do it in less an obvious manner. You can say many things about the WSJ, but "crank territory" is certainly not one. You must be projecting your own crank views. Stay sane.

Great. Not I’m gonna have drag all the crappy op-eds they shat all over the place for the last few years. Not a fun way to spend my day.