Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Those hiking pictures with a "baby," 2 dogs, and 2 body guards were so over the top. I read some nonsense article about her ambition to be president one day. This is beyond out of control. I am afraid for what's next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those hiking pictures with a "baby," 2 dogs, and 2 body guards were so over the top. I read some nonsense article about her ambition to be president one day. This is beyond out of control. I am afraid for what's next.

Trump was a D-list celebrity with a terrible TV show and now he’s president. Anything is possible! Frankly, I would prefer Meghan to Trump by a LOT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those hiking pictures with a "baby," 2 dogs, and 2 body guards were so over the top. I read some nonsense article about her ambition to be president one day. This is beyond out of control. I am afraid for what's next.

Trump was a D-list celebrity with a terrible TV show and now he’s president. Anything is possible! Frankly, I would prefer Meghan to Trump by a LOT.

+1 Me too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You do know that when Charles dies, which he will eventually (he's over 70 now) if for some horrible reason Will and his kids died too - in a car crash or freak accident or whatever - then Harry would need to step in to be King and his son would be the next King.

Its happened before with King George.

I'm not sure. Would it go to Archie or would the crown go to Edward's kids? Or other kids?

It would go to Harry as 2nd son of Charles and then to Archie his son.
Edward is so far out of the picture now after Archie it would be ANDREW (god forbid) then his kids then Edward then his kids. Anne unfortunately is not in the running. Old rules. Changed for new generations only.

Anne is still in the running. Just after all her brothers and their descendants. Just like Margaret was “the spare” until Charles came along.

[Anonymous]

I saw some reports that Meghan and Harry are suing the tabloids that released the hiking photos? But she’s literally making eye contact with the camera and smiling- she doesn’t seem unhappy to me. I’m not a Meghan hater but this has me scratching my head a bit for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You do know that when Charles dies, which he will eventually (he's over 70 now) if for some horrible reason Will and his kids died too - in a car crash or freak accident or whatever - then Harry would need to step in to be King and his son would be the next King.

Its happened before with King George.

I'm not sure. Would it go to Archie or would the crown go to Edward's kids? Or other kids?

It would go to Harry as 2nd son of Charles and then to Archie his son.
Edward is so far out of the picture now after Archie it would be ANDREW (god forbid) then his kids then Edward then his kids. Anne unfortunately is not in the running. Old rules. Changed for new generations only.

Anne is still in the running. Just after all her brothers and their descendants. Just like Margaret was “the spare” until Charles came along.

Then it would only be Anne after Andrew, his kids, Edward, his kids. Anne is also old, nearly 70.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Meghan doesn’t want to be photographed at all, why is she looking directly at the camera and smiling in the photos from her walk yesterday?

I noticed the same thing. Those were not natural photos. She was posing, while her baby was hanging out of his carrier. She is the ultimate phony.

There is a rumor going around that that wasn't even a real baby. Lol. They claim the baby is too big (age wise). Omg. It gets crazier by the minute.

I don't have a dog in this fight. But I kind of hope it wasn't a real baby b/c that poor thing looked so awkward in the carrier, like it's face was smushed up against her. I'd feel better if it was a baby doll!

Having carried a child of about Archie’s size in one of those carriers, they do look awkward but the kids are comfortable and cozy. It was just an awkward shoot / photo op in general. Seems like a woman fleeing the press wouldn’t want to invite more press pictures of her in what looked like a close and intimate setting with child in tow. I dunno. YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It’s amazing how fast the royal glow is wearing off. They just look like two minor reality tv stars now.

Riiight... Because minor celebrities are covered by all the major newspapers in the world. But forget that. Even in your little corner of the world, they still generated a 300+ page thread in a matter of days! This is one of the biggest threads on DCUM history. You even commented, but I’m sure you’re right “nobody cares.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Meghan doesn’t want to be photographed at all, why is she looking directly at the camera and smiling in the photos from her walk yesterday?

I noticed the same thing. Those were not natural photos. She was posing, while her baby was hanging out of his carrier. She is the ultimate phony.

There is a rumor going around that that wasn't even a real baby. Lol. They claim the baby is too big (age wise). Omg. It gets crazier by the minute.

I don't have a dog in this fight. But I kind of hope it wasn't a real baby b/c that poor thing looked so awkward in the carrier, like it's face was smushed up against her. I'd feel better if it was a baby doll!

Having carried a child of about Archie’s size in one of those carriers, they do look awkward but the kids are comfortable and cozy. It was just an awkward shoot / photo op in general. Seems like a woman fleeing the press wouldn’t want to invite more press pictures of her in what looked like a close and intimate setting with child in tow. I dunno. YMMV.

One of the shoulder straps was off her shoulder and he was definitely crotch-dangling. Archie wasn't comfortable or secure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw some reports that Meghan and Harry are suing the tabloids that released the hiking photos? But she’s literally making eye contact with the camera and smiling- she doesn’t seem unhappy to me. I’m not a Meghan hater but this has me scratching my head a bit for sure.

She is a loose cannon and he has to prove to dad that he is trying to get her under control or they lose security and annual stipend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It’s amazing how fast the royal glow is wearing off. They just look like two minor reality tv stars now.

Riiight... Because minor celebrities are covered by all the major newspapers in the world. But forget that. Even in your little corner of the world, they still generated a 300+ page thread in a matter of days! This is one of the biggest threads on DCUM history. You even commented, but I’m sure you’re right “nobody cares.”

Theirs was one of the most spectacular burning of bridges in recent history. Add in blackmailing granny the queen. This train wreck was like a mix of Downton Abbey, The Crown and Game of Thrones. Thoroughly entertaining.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? It’s amazing how fast the royal glow is wearing off. They just look like two minor reality tv stars now.

Riiight... Because minor celebrities are covered by all the major newspapers in the world. But forget that. Even in your little corner of the world, they still generated a 300+ page thread in a matter of days! This is one of the biggest threads on DCUM history. You even commented, but I’m sure you’re right “nobody cares.”

Theirs was one of the most spectacular burning of bridges in recent history. Add in blackmailing granny the queen. This train wreck was like a mix of Downton Abbey, The Crown and Game of Thrones. Thoroughly entertaining.

+1 I'm watching because she is a train wreck. Not because I care about the teeny tiny tacky jewelry or ill fitting clothes she put on for the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those hiking pictures with a "baby," 2 dogs, and 2 body guards were so over the top. I read some nonsense article about her ambition to be president one day. This is beyond out of control. I am afraid for what's next.

Trump was a D-list celebrity with a terrible TV show and now he’s president. Anything is possible! Frankly, I would prefer Meghan to Trump by a LOT.

+1 Me too!

She’d quit after two years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those hiking pictures with a "baby," 2 dogs, and 2 body guards were so over the top. I read some nonsense article about her ambition to be president one day. This is beyond out of control. I am afraid for what's next.

Trump was a D-list celebrity with a terrible TV show and now he’s president. Anything is possible! Frankly, I would prefer Meghan to Trump by a LOT.

+1 Me too!

She’d quit after two years.

Like Palin...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw some reports that Meghan and Harry are suing the tabloids that released the hiking photos? But she’s literally making eye contact with the camera and smiling- she doesn’t seem unhappy to me. I’m not a Meghan hater but this has me scratching my head a bit for sure.

They seem extremely naive to think they can control the media now that they are away from Britain and the Royal Rota.