Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

He might be impeached in the House before the end of September. Or step down before then.

This is moving fast. Hold onto your hat.

And it gets quashed like a bug in the Senate. So what's your point? Another dem failure to use a gasoline in the 2020 race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

They have no choice. They swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

They have no choice. They swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Oh yes, because there is NO other choice except to do what the democrats and insane liberals want to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

They have no choice. They swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Oh yes, because there is NO other choice except to do what the democrats and insane liberals want to do.

Trump is soliciting foreign aid to interfere with the election, and putting that country in grave danger. That's insane.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

They have no choice. They swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Oh yes, because there is NO other choice except to do what the democrats and insane liberals want to do.

Trump is soliciting foreign aid to interfere with the election, and putting that country in grave danger. That's insane.

And more to the point, putting Ukraine in danger puts us in danger.

We don't give them military aid because we're buddies. We do it out of self-interest. National self-interest, not Trump's personal self-interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

Republicans took about four months to impeach Clinton. When there’s a will there’s a way. And boy, do we have the will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why they’re bothering.

Senate won’t vote to convict.

There will be cracks. The known facts are enough for the American public to understand. if the reactions to the whistleblower claims are accurate there is no way the GOP will hold on this. Pence is complicit too. Barr, Mulvaney, Giuliani, Pompeo likely have grave liability as well.

Sure, because the Dems are going to be able to pull off an entire impeachment process, vote on it, convince enough GOP to vote for them in the Senate and put the impeachment on the floor for a vote in the Senate in the span of about 10-11 months. Oh yeah, there's still Christmas, New Years, Thanksgiving, plus all of the potential weeks off that the House and Senate won't be in session.

Epic disaster for the Dems. And they'll get blamed for tanking the stock market and everyone's 401ks too.

Republicans took about four months to impeach Clinton. When there’s a will there’s a way. And boy, do we have the will.

It took less than two weeks for Nixon to go.

[Anonymous]

218 House members for impeachment. They have a majority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
218 House members for impeachment. They have a majority.

219 with Amash.

[Anonymous]

Pelosi is a wise woman avoiding impeachment b/c she knows:


While the Ukraine conversation does have political hijinks, I’m suspect in trial in can be papered over as ferreting out corruption with help from overseas. I suspect it was actually a setup and that’s how the CIA analyst even got the transcript; he wanted to goad the Dems to impeach him before election, trial ends with no removal, his base is energized and coasts into reelection. And is then impeachment proof for his second term. (And beyond... who knows)

No president has ever been removed from office. No way in hell are the Republicans let them be the first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi is a wise woman avoiding impeachment b/c she knows:


While the Ukraine conversation does have political hijinks, I’m suspect in trial in can be papered over as ferreting out corruption with help from overseas. I suspect it was actually a setup and that’s how the CIA analyst even got the transcript; he wanted to goad the Dems to impeach him before election, trial ends with no removal, his base is energized and coasts into reelection. And is then impeachment proof for his second term. (And beyond... who knows)

No president has ever been removed from office. No way in hell are the Republicans let them be the first.

Please. Trump isn't playing 9D chess. He's barely able to walk and talk, let alone string together a coherent sentence.

Impeachment isn't a trap. It's the right thing to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi is a wise woman avoiding impeachment b/c she knows:


While the Ukraine conversation does have political hijinks, I’m suspect in trial in can be papered over as ferreting out corruption with help from overseas. I suspect it was actually a setup and that’s how the CIA analyst even got the transcript; he wanted to goad the Dems to impeach him before election, trial ends with no removal, his base is energized and coasts into reelection. And is then impeachment proof for his second term. (And beyond... who knows)

No president has ever been removed from office. No way in hell are the Republicans let them be the first.

Or, Trump IS the corruption and if you take his words at face value, the information known to date is nothing more than a simple mob shakedown. It's just that the shakedown has national security implications.

Behind closed doors, the GOP senators are very concerned and I am already hearing about Amb. Haley being ready to jump into action.

[Anonymous]

https://theresurgent.com/2019/09/25/republican-source-the-whistleblower-paints-a-clear-path-to-impeachment/

Speaking on background to a Republican congressional source who has direct knowledge of the whistleblower report, he says it is really bad. He says the GOP can attack it as partisan because, in his words, “this is written by someone who does not like the President” but also that “regardless, the whistleblower is credible.”

According to the source, the report “paints a clear path to impeachment” with enough information that Democrats will be able to make appropriate document requests and subpoena witnesses for a focused effort.

“I wasn’t happy with the transcript, but it was Trump. What do you expect? Now we are dealing with something that looks like it could be outside the bounds of acceptable conduct.”

The source said he would not be definite, but it fully opens up a path for a thorough and focused impeachment process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi is a wise woman avoiding impeachment b/c she knows:


While the Ukraine conversation does have political hijinks, I’m suspect in trial in can be papered over as ferreting out corruption with help from overseas. I suspect it was actually a setup and that’s how the CIA analyst even got the transcript; he wanted to goad the Dems to impeach him before election, trial ends with no removal, his base is energized and coasts into reelection. And is then impeachment proof for his second term. (And beyond... who knows)

No president has ever been removed from office. No way in hell are the Republicans let them be the first.

Why are people not getting this?!?

This is not about removing him from office (although it would be nice, but he's not going to be reelected anyway).

This is about TAKING A STAND. Recording our opposition to Trump's corruption and amorality for the history books.

This alone is worth all the effort of impeachment.

It's a matter of principle. Honor. Patriotism.

Concepts that are perhaps missing from your understanding, since you haven't yet figured what this is about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pelosi is a wise woman avoiding impeachment b/c she knows:


While the Ukraine conversation does have political hijinks, I’m suspect in trial in can be papered over as ferreting out corruption with help from overseas. I suspect it was actually a setup and that’s how the CIA analyst even got the transcript; he wanted to goad the Dems to impeach him before election, trial ends with no removal, his base is energized and coasts into reelection. And is then impeachment proof for his second term. (And beyond... who knows)

No president has ever been removed from office. No way in hell are the Republicans let them be the first.

Please. Trump isn't playing 9D chess. He's barely able to walk and talk, let alone string together a coherent sentence.

Impeachment isn't a trap. It's the right thing to do.

Why was Pelosi delaying?