Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This guy defends himself against sexual assault allegations just as well as you would expect from a guy named Brett. Regardless of the accusations — which I happen to believe...because BRETT — his stupidity when trying to defend himself should make him unfit as a GOP nominee. No wonder Mitch didn’t want him.

[Anonymous]

He knows where the party was, who's house it was at? Do tell

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy defends himself against sexual assault allegations just as well as you would expect from a guy named Brett. Regardless of the accusations — which I happen to believe...because BRETT — his stupidity when trying to defend himself should make him unfit as a GOP nominee. No wonder Mitch didn’t want him.

Agree. While watching the Fox interview, we were noting that he hardly sounds like a lawyer. Not even a judge. He had a hard time coming up with basic words. Strange.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

Who cares? Seriously if his wife stands by him the only negative consequence he suffers is NOT getting this job. He's not going to be charged with Jack sh$#.

So.... his neighbors give him the side eye occasionally?

Wow.

I'm just sick of people acting like this guys life is ruined even he gets to go back to his family and lifelong judgeship that will pay him 200k plus for as long as he wants to work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is disgusting

He is disgusting

I cannot believe this is the best the GOP thinks they can do - what a gross man they picked

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

And his poor wife. She looks disgusted at him, but is trying to play the part for the sake of her kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Chad Pergram of Fox News Kavanaugh does NOT have the votes right now.

There aren't 51 votes against him either.

He will be confirmed. After the hearing, all but 1 or 2 republicans plus 3 red state democrats will put him over the finish line.

A lot of GOPers could do the right thing and vote against him inlcluding Flake, Corker, Nelson, Heitkamp, and several others. The whip count is not looking good right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is disgusting

He is disgusting

I cannot believe this is the best the GOP thinks they can do - what a gross man they picked

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

The NYT? Riiiiiiight.

LOL. Did you even read it? The facts are indisputable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy defends himself against sexual assault allegations just as well as you would expect from a guy named Brett. Regardless of the accusations — which I happen to believe...because BRETT — his stupidity when trying to defend himself should make him unfit as a GOP nominee. No wonder Mitch didn’t want him.

Agree. While watching the Fox interview, we were noting that he hardly sounds like a lawyer. Not even a judge. He had a hard time coming up with basic words. Strange.

Not surprising, PP - the man probably hasn't slept well in days.
And rightly so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

Who cares? Seriously if his wife stands by him the only negative consequence he suffers is NOT getting this job. He's not going to be charged with Jack sh$#.

So.... his neighbors give him the side eye occasionally?

Wow.

I'm just sick of people acting like this guys life is ruined even he gets to go back to his family and lifelong judgeship that will pay him 200k plus for as long as he wants to work

Dems are trying to assuage their guilt for this smear campaign by pretending it's no big deal to destroy someone's reputation. He can't simply go back to his previous life after the liberals have done their number on him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy defends himself against sexual assault allegations just as well as you would expect from a guy named Brett. Regardless of the accusations — which I happen to believe...because BRETT — his stupidity when trying to defend himself should make him unfit as a GOP nominee. No wonder Mitch didn’t want him.

Agree. While watching the Fox interview, we were noting that he hardly sounds like a lawyer. Not even a judge. He had a hard time coming up with basic words. Strange.

Perfect Trumpian pick! #thebestpeople

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What lying, conniving weasel Kavanaugh showed himself to be in the Fox interview.

And if he really was a virgin (but nonetheless a harrasser) until "many years" after college... wow. 27? 28? 29? Hilarious!

He ought to have been questioned about his finances. Such a fluffy interview. He dodged most of the questions, repeating ad nauseum "I want a fair process..." rinse, repeat.

No, he did not come off as truthful. He came off as evasive. He didn't even answer the question as to whether or not he wanted an FBI investigation. His wife dodged that one completely, looking at her husband and he didn't answer the question.

I actually felt sorry for his wife. She seems brainwashed and sad. All her answers were so carefully rehearsed and completely empty.

This didn't help Kavanaugh at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Chad Pergram of Fox News Kavanaugh does NOT have the votes right now.

There aren't 51 votes against him either.

He will be confirmed. After the hearing, all but 1 or 2 republicans plus 3 red state democrats will put him over the finish line.

A lot of GOPers could do the right thing and vote against him inlcluding Flake, Corker, Nelson, Heitkamp, and several others. The whip count is not looking good right now.

Why would it be the right thing to vote against him? The accusations are unfounded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He knows where the party was, who's house it was at? Do tell

It seems like it based on the Fox interview. This is why and FBI investigation will resolve a lot of issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Chad Pergram of Fox News Kavanaugh does NOT have the votes right now.

There aren't 51 votes against him either.

He will be confirmed. After the hearing, all but 1 or 2 republicans plus 3 red state democrats will put him over the finish line.

A lot of GOPers could do the right thing and vote against him inlcluding Flake, Corker, Nelson, Heitkamp, and several others. The whip count is not looking good right now.

No one answered my question earlier as to whether the Judiciary Committee had voted on him yet. If they haven’t, Flake could give a McCain-style thumbs down and kill the nomination before it even gets to the floor, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

Who cares? Seriously if his wife stands by him the only negative consequence he suffers is NOT getting this job. He's not going to be charged with Jack sh$#.

So.... his neighbors give him the side eye occasionally?

Wow.

I'm just sick of people acting like this guys life is ruined even he gets to go back to his family and lifelong judgeship that will pay him 200k plus for as long as he wants to work

Dems are trying to assuage their guilt for this smear campaign by pretending it's no big deal to destroy someone's reputation. He can't simply go back to his previous life after the liberals have done their number on him.

He certainly can. Aside from one or two defectors, he already has had 65 of his social circle vouch for him. His reputation will be fine.