Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who has 65 vaguely moderate Republican seeming women on speed dial....it’s like the Justice League.

More like the Catholic League.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can republicans really not find someone better than this chump? He is damaged goods. Pick a better nominee and move forward.

Absolutely not. We have to make a stand against these tactics. Democrats must learn that they can never try to do this again. Kavanaugh will make them pay once he is on the court.

Blame Democrats and not Kavanaugh himself. What planet are you from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:According to Chad Pergram of Fox News Kavanaugh does NOT have the votes right now.

There aren't 51 votes against him either.

He will be confirmed. After the hearing, all but 1 or 2 republicans plus 3 red state democrats will put him over the finish line.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

Who cares? Seriously if his wife stands by him the only negative consequence he suffers is NOT getting this job. He's not going to be charged with Jack sh$#.

So.... his neighbors give him the side eye occasionally?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why not do trial by ordeal? Throw him in the Potomac and see if he floats. Would be the same amount of due process that Democrats want to give him.

He's not going to jail people. He either gets one of the most prestigious jobs in the land as a lifetime appointee or goes back to his slightly less prestigious lifetime appointment job.

With his reputation ruined.

Who cares? Seriously if his wife stands by him the only negative consequence he suffers is NOT getting this job. He's not going to be charged with Jack sh$#.

So.... his neighbors give him the side eye occasionally?

Wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can republicans really not find someone better than this chump? He is damaged goods. Pick a better nominee and move forward.

Absolutely not. We have to make a stand against these tactics. Democrats must learn that they can never try to do this again. Kavanaugh will make them pay once he is on the court.

Agree. It would be akin to giving into a two-year throwing a tantrum because he wants ice cream for dinner instead of fish fillets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can republicans really not find someone better than this chump? He is damaged goods. Pick a better nominee and move forward.

Absolutely not. We have to make a stand against these tactics. Democrats must learn that they can never try to do this again. Kavanaugh will make them pay once he is on the court.

Blame Democrats and not Kavanaugh himself. What planet are you from?

We must close ranks and protect him. If not, EVERYONE will be vulnerable to these types of vicious, made-up smears.

[Anonymous]

This is disgusting

He is disgusting

I cannot believe this is the best the GOP thinks they can do - what a gross man they picked

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Chad Pergram of Fox News Kavanaugh does NOT have the votes right now.

There aren't 51 votes against him either.

He will be confirmed. After the hearing, all but 1 or 2 republicans plus 3 red state democrats will put him over the finish line.

There are 51 Republicans. If he looses two, that brings the vote to 49. If just ONE Democrat votes yes, that brings it to 50'- and Pence breaks the tie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh underestimated the depths to which the liberals could sink. If he had read this forum, he would have known.

I think your guy knows how to swim in a swamp. He got his friend to smear Ford by alleging his other friend (who must have been on board since he’s been mum) was the guy everyone’s looking for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can republicans really not find someone better than this chump? He is damaged goods. Pick a better nominee and move forward.

Absolutely not. We have to make a stand against these tactics. Democrats must learn that they can never try to do this again. Kavanaugh will make them pay once he is on the court.

Do you agree he is a partisan hack that is incapable of rational and balanced decsion-making. Glad we see eye to eye on that, although I am very concerned that you care more about him “getting even” than the future of your country. You Republicans make me sick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: New York Times reports that one of the 65 women who signed the letter in support of Kavanaugh was name checked as a slut by Kavanaugh and several of his friends in his yearbook. She’s furious.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html

But he said on his Fox stunt that he ALWAYS treated women with respect. Well, except for poor Renate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What lying, conniving weasel Kavanaugh showed himself to be in the Fox interview.

And if he really was a virgin (but nonetheless a harrasser) until "many years" after college... wow. 27? 28? 29? Hilarious!

Christine Blasey Ford, has stated that she does not remember the location of the party, but she said it took place in a "suburban Maryland area home".

However, in tonight's Fox interview with Brett Kavanaugh, he states a specific location of the party (at 2:26/13:41).

According to Brett, the party was "at a house near Connecticut Avenue and East West Highway". So why does he have a location of the party and she does not?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/24/kavanaugh-denies-sexual-misconduct-in-fox-news-exclusive-know-im-telling-truth.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is disgusting

He is disgusting

I cannot believe this is the best the GOP thinks they can do - what a gross man they picked

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

The NYT? Riiiiiiight.