ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

GA BY is as dead as Kamala Harris's bid for California governor.

[Anonymous]

GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

You sound drunk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

You sound drunk.

What does that matter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

[Anonymous]

Having an MLSN3 makes it even more likely they go school year. You don’t try to grow in the masses by slicing the market in half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Having an MLSN3 makes it even more likely they go school year. You don’t try to grow in the masses by slicing the market in half.

That’s what BY did in 2017? Look at most teams and they are heavily Jan to July players. When you have a one year calendar and biobanding it doesn’t really matter what date you choose.

It will always be front loaded with the oldest kids and you can always bioband down the younger kids to age group below.

I think parents see it as a bigger deal than MLSN does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

They don't have the capacity for any of that. They aren't even running MLSN2. They can barely run MLSN1.

"They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams." Hilarious! They can't even do that for the one league of teams they have now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

They don't have the capacity for any of that. They aren't even running MLSN2. They can barely run MLSN1.

"They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams." Hilarious! They can't even do that for the one league of teams they have now!

In sorta fairness, THEY could outside the academy teams, especially as they build out a pipeline with multiple levels. It would be better developmentally -- for any of these alphabet soup groups -- IF they could have multiple levels so that the age groups could move within them based on how they do on the field rather that which club they are in with some obviously stuck above their level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

They don't have the capacity for any of that. They aren't even running MLSN2. They can barely run MLSN1.

"They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams." Hilarious! They can't even do that for the one league of teams they have now!

They are working on building it out. Give it 2-3 years and it will all be in place. A full relation for non academy teams with multiple levels to move up and down. They will also have a pre MLSN league with levels as well.

[Anonymous]

This decision to move to the Aug. 1 cut-off reverts to the same age group cut-off used prior to 2017, when U.S. Soccer mandated a Jan. 1-Dec. 31 timeframe. U.S. Soccer removed this mandate in late 2024, empowering its Organization Members to make the most appropriate age group formation decision for their members. US Club Soccer, US Youth Soccer and AYSO – the three largest youth soccer organizations in the country – have remained in lockstep in making these decisions, recognizing the importance of consistency across the landscape.

This is from US soccer website it says the mandate was removed late 2024? Does that mean clubs and leagues can change as early as they want?

[Anonymous]

https://usclubsoccer.org/age-group-cut-off-update-for-2026-27-season/#:~:text=1%20cut%2Doff%20reverts%20to,formation%20decision%20for%20their%20members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

They don't have the capacity for any of that. They aren't even running MLSN2. They can barely run MLSN1.

"They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams." Hilarious! They can't even do that for the one league of teams they have now!

They are working on building it out. Give it 2-3 years and it will all be in place. A full relation for non academy teams with multiple levels to move up and down. They will also have a pre MLSN league with levels as well.

This seems more like a dream rather than actual reality. Also don’t think they have 2-3 years to roll it out, would have to be ready to go next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This decision to move to the Aug. 1 cut-off reverts to the same age group cut-off used prior to 2017, when U.S. Soccer mandated a Jan. 1-Dec. 31 timeframe. U.S. Soccer removed this mandate in late 2024, empowering its Organization Members to make the most appropriate age group formation decision for their members. US Club Soccer, US Youth Soccer and AYSO – the three largest youth soccer organizations in the country – have remained in lockstep in making these decisions, recognizing the importance of consistency across the landscape.

This is from US soccer website it says the mandate was removed late 2024? Does that mean clubs and leagues can change as early as they want?

No. If you keep reading the press release it says: "Again, please note that this decision is effective beginning with each Organization Member’s 2026-27 season/registration year."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA obviously going SY.

It seems likely that MLSN will stay BY. But there is also a rumor that there is going to be an MLSN3 come next year. So maybe they are going SY after all.

All MLSN will go one way or another. And its just hard to believe tier 3 would stick to BY.

They have MLSN 2 already starting this year it’s not crazy to think they won’t have MLSN 3 for 26/27?

MLSN has not decided yet. As of now they are still planning on staying BY. Will probably follow ECNL lead and run a little U9 pre MLSN league.

They will definitely have MLSN 1,2,3 that will happen. Same thing with Pre little league. They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams.

They don't have the capacity for any of that. They aren't even running MLSN2. They can barely run MLSN1.

"They will have relegation and tournaments for all teams." Hilarious! They can't even do that for the one league of teams they have now!

They are working on building it out. Give it 2-3 years and it will all be in place. A full relation for non academy teams with multiple levels to move up and down. They will also have a pre MLSN league with levels as well.

This seems more like a dream rather than actual reality. Also don’t think they have 2-3 years to roll it out, would have to be ready to go next year.