Petition to bring back SROs

[Anonymous]

The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

I guess it's no different than the poster who keeps telling us over and over how SROs will make schools safe since they don't really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

The NRA lobby loves SROs. That's actually their answer to school shootings. I can't help but wonder if this never ending stream of pro-SRO posts are from their lobbyists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

The NRA lobby loves SROs. That's actually their answer to school shootings. I can't help but wonder if this never ending stream of pro-SRO posts are from their lobbyists.

Nope. Some of us are just concerned parents with kids in the school system. I actually am very anti-gun, but I live in reality and I know that there are hundreds of millions of guns in this country. I know they are in our schools. I can say “I want gun reform” until I’m out of breath. That won’t take away the guns (and ghost guns) in this region. It won’t take away the people with ill intent who plan to use them. Until someone can make this a gun-free utopia, I want my children as safe from harm as can be. That includes having SROs in schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

It's like 90% of the violent incidents at MCPS are committed by black/hispanic kids so we should kick them all out and put them in an alternate school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

The NRA lobby loves SROs. That's actually their answer to school shootings. I can't help but wonder if this never ending stream of pro-SRO posts are from their lobbyists.

Nope. Some of us are just concerned parents with kids in the school system. I actually am very anti-gun, but I live in reality and I know that there are hundreds of millions of guns in this country. I know they are in our schools. I can say “I want gun reform” until I’m out of breath. That won’t take away the guns (and ghost guns) in this region. It won’t take away the people with ill intent who plan to use them. Until someone can make this a gun-free utopia, I want my children as safe from harm as can be. That includes having SROs in schools.

+1 I'm all for stricter gun laws, evening banning all guns, but until this is a reality, I'm for SROs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

The NRA lobby loves SROs. That's actually their answer to school shootings. I can't help but wonder if this never ending stream of pro-SRO posts are from their lobbyists.

Nope. Some of us are just concerned parents with kids in the school system. I actually am very anti-gun, but I live in reality and I know that there are hundreds of millions of guns in this country. I know they are in our schools. I can say “I want gun reform” until I’m out of breath. That won’t take away the guns (and ghost guns) in this region. It won’t take away the people with ill intent who plan to use them. Until someone can make this a gun-free utopia, I want my children as safe from harm as can be. That includes having SROs in schools.

+1 I'm all for stricter gun laws, evening banning all guns, but until this is a reality, I'm for SROs.

THIS. I freaking hate guns! But you know what I hate even more? Schools where my kids are not safe and don't feel safe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

The NRA lobby loves SROs. That's actually their answer to school shootings. I can't help but wonder if this never ending stream of pro-SRO posts are from their lobbyists.

Nope. Some of us are just concerned parents with kids in the school system. I actually am very anti-gun, but I live in reality and I know that there are hundreds of millions of guns in this country. I know they are in our schools. I can say “I want gun reform” until I’m out of breath. That won’t take away the guns (and ghost guns) in this region. It won’t take away the people with ill intent who plan to use them. Until someone can make this a gun-free utopia, I want my children as safe from harm as can be. That includes having SROs in schools.

+1 I'm all for stricter gun laws, evening banning all guns, but until this is a reality, I'm for SROs.

THIS. I freaking hate guns! But you know what I hate even more? Schools where my kids are not safe and don't feel safe.

Well MCPS has SRO’s so… it’s a moot point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The family of the Magruder student who was shot is suing the MCPS Board of Ed and the Montgomery County Council for not providing safety measures that could've prevented the shooting, in particular, an SRO: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/mother-of-magruder-shooting-victim-sues-school-county

I guess they never heard about Parkland or Uvalde, where the presence of SROs failed to make a difference.

You're awake! Happy Friday! So how many times will you mention Parkland and Uvalde today? That would be a fun game.

DP. I saw the Parkland and Uvalde response and thought the same thing. It’s the only thing this poster seems to be able to fall back on as an argument.

The failures of SROs present at both Parkland and Uvalde illustrate how SROs aren't going to make a school safe which seems to be the whole argument for them.

This is like saying all cops are bad because of the actions of a few, or all black kids are bad because the actions of a few. Or that gun laws don't stop mass killings so why have gun laws. You are using the same logic as gun nutters use. Like I said before, you progressive liberals are no different than the right wing extremists.. just opposite sides of the same extremist coin.

What happened in FL has nothing to do with what happens in MCPS. FL doesn't have the same kind of oversight on the police that MoCo does.

No not really. It's like saying over 90% of the major school shooting where SROs were present they did not have the positive impact that their advocates suggested which makes me think we're going about this wrong. Maybe instead of putting more guns in school we should consider real gun reform.

It's like 90% of the violent incidents at MCPS are committed by black/hispanic kids so we should kick them all out and put them in an alternate school.

I think you mean 90% are blamed.