Petition to bring back SROs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Google is your friend. Plenty of story’s. Stop with your nonsense.

I agree. I saw the PP’s post and I was about to pull tons of examples. Then I decided not to waste my time.

If PP truly cared to see positive SRO stories, then PP would have already done that extremely simple Google search.

It’s the same person over and over again. We’ve posted plenty of examples. They have a weird agenda and don’t care who they harm in the process.

It’s rather frustrating, especially since this poster keeps us from having a genuine conversation about school safety.

I find it fascinating that I can post I’ve personally witnessed a SRO respond to a stabbing, and somehow that’s not evidence that they can be beneficial. And this poster says SROs shouldn’t be trained in emergency first aid?

Makes me wonder if this poster is a high schooler here just for fun.

Because anecdotal examples are not universally true.

Of course not, but they certainly disprove your theory that SROs never do anything beneficial.

I didn’t say they never did anything beneficial. I said they don’t save lives.

Even a person who mops the floors is beneficial.

You wrote “There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.” I gave you an example.

And you’re going to somehow downplay that? I’ll say saving a kid shows the benefit of SROs in schools. I suppose you disagree.

Honestly, we should just have this thread locked.

It was a choking situation… are you daft?

What was? The stabbing I personally witnessed? You’re telling me I didn’t see what I saw?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

If a person is stabbed they can bleed out in the time it takes to get an officer there.

Yes, that's why schools need Paramedics not SROs on staff.

Ideally we have both, plus metal detectors and more security guards. And, cameras.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

lol that was a choking incident at lunch.

And the story saved them. Grow up. Get some mental health treatment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

If a person is stabbed they can bleed out in the time it takes to get an officer there.

Yes, that's why schools need Paramedics not SROs on staff.

Ideally we have both, plus metal detectors and more security guards. And, cameras.

Wouldn’t that be great? I’d go for SROs, security guards, cameras, guidance counselors, and additional nurses. It would be nice if administrators were always in the hall, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

I'm sure you can find one or two rare cases where they did some good but there are many more where they did nothing or made schools less safe. Parkland and Uvalde come to mind.

Ok, those were two rare incidents years ago. You need new talking points. I cannot imagine the kids or parents of those schools don’t want Eros or more security after what happened. There are always bad seeds in every profession but the bad outweighs the good. Many of us are tried of the drugs and violence in the schools. The assaults, the rapes, the bullying and much more. How do you propose ending that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

I'm sure you can find one or two rare cases where they did some good but there are many more where they did nothing or made schools less safe. Parkland and Uvalde come to mind.

Ok, those were two rare incidents years ago. You need new talking points. I cannot imagine the kids or parents of those schools don’t want Eros or more security after what happened. There are always bad seeds in every profession but the bad outweighs the good. Many of us are tried of the drugs and violence in the schools. The assaults, the rapes, the bullying and much more. How do you propose ending that!

DP here. I’m assuming you meant the good outweighs the bad, and I definitely agree.

Just to let you know, the PP doesn’t have a solution. I’m thinking PP is a high school child here just to have fun, hence the repeated vague statements and the inability to fully respond to a question like the one you posted above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

I'm sure you can find one or two rare cases where they did some good but there are many more where they did nothing or made schools less safe. Parkland and Uvalde come to mind.

Ok, those were two rare incidents years ago. You need new talking points. I cannot imagine the kids or parents of those schools don’t want Eros or more security after what happened. There are always bad seeds in every profession but the bad outweighs the good. Many of us are tried of the drugs and violence in the schools. The assaults, the rapes, the bullying and much more. How do you propose ending that!

DP here. I’m assuming you meant the good outweighs the bad, and I definitely agree.

Just to let you know, the PP doesn’t have a solution. I’m thinking PP is a high school child here just to have fun, hence the repeated vague statements and the inability to fully respond to a question like the one you posted above.

They constantly post the same one-liner. I think its an adult with graduated kids or kids not in MCPS who have no idea or don't care as they'd rather protect kids who are unable to behave or control themselves rather than protect the kids behaving and staff trying to do their jobs. Until it is their kid shot, stabbed, rapped or terrorized they will not care. OR, its their kids behaving this way and instead of addressing the behavior and getting their kid the help they need, they'd rather take away all consequences and blame others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

I'm sure you can find one or two rare cases where they did some good but there are many more where they did nothing or made schools less safe. Parkland and Uvalde come to mind.

Ok, those were two rare incidents years ago. You need new talking points. I cannot imagine the kids or parents of those schools don’t want Eros or more security after what happened. There are always bad seeds in every profession but the bad outweighs the good. Many of us are tried of the drugs and violence in the schools. The assaults, the rapes, the bullying and much more. How do you propose ending that!

DP here. I’m assuming you meant the good outweighs the bad, and I definitely agree.

Just to let you know, the PP doesn’t have a solution. I’m thinking PP is a high school child here just to have fun, hence the repeated vague statements and the inability to fully respond to a question like the one you posted above.

They constantly post the same one-liner. I think its an adult with graduated kids or kids not in MCPS who have no idea or don't care as they'd rather protect kids who are unable to behave or control themselves rather than protect the kids behaving and staff trying to do their jobs. Until it is their kid shot, stabbed, rapped or terrorized they will not care. OR, its their kids behaving this way and instead of addressing the behavior and getting their kid the help they need, they'd rather take away all consequences and blame others.

So you think brining guns into schools make them safer? sheesh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

If a person is stabbed they can bleed out in the time it takes to get an officer there.

Yes, that's why schools need Paramedics not SROs on staff.

Ideally we have both, plus metal detectors and more security guards. And, cameras.

Wouldn’t that be great? I’d go for SROs, security guards, cameras, guidance counselors, and additional nurses. It would be nice if administrators were always in the hall, too.

It would be awesome if your fellow constituents would agree to the massive tax hike that would be necessary to cover all these desires.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

If a person is stabbed they can bleed out in the time it takes to get an officer there.

Yes, that's why schools need Paramedics not SROs on staff.

Ideally we have both, plus metal detectors and more security guards. And, cameras.

Wouldn’t that be great? I’d go for SROs, security guards, cameras, guidance counselors, and additional nurses. It would be nice if administrators were always in the hall, too.

Completely agree with admin. Ours are pretty much non-existent except when parents are around from what my kids say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Removing weapons from children doesn’t save lives? Being the first responders when students are injured doesn’t save lives?

I watched one stop a stab wound. Does that count?

when the boy was shot at Magruder HS, they called it in as a "stabbing".

They are not trained in stuff like this, nor should they be.

The CEO came to the HS after a few minutes of the 911 call, and then called for backup. A few minutes could be the difference between life and death if the shooter was still active.

In such cases, having an SRO in the school would have been more helpful.

If a person is stabbed they can bleed out in the time it takes to get an officer there.

Yes, that's why schools need Paramedics not SROs on staff.

Ideally we have both, plus metal detectors and more security guards. And, cameras.

Wouldn’t that be great? I’d go for SROs, security guards, cameras, guidance counselors, and additional nurses. It would be nice if administrators were always in the hall, too.

It would be awesome if your fellow constituents would agree to the massive tax hike that would be necessary to cover all these desires.

MCPS has plenty of money for what's important to them. We can cut out the grants to non-profits, we can cut out some of central office, we can cut out the BOE new offices, and do a major audit of every dollar spent to find the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know about this SRO thinge. It really didn't do much good at Parkland or Uvalde.

RJ is not SRO. If there were more SRO's maybe some of this could be prevented. You are using two incidents. Many more where SRO's did good.

At Parkland and Uvalde, when an armed assailant was present, the SROs just ran away.

Ok? You had two bad sros but reality is one person cannot do that alone. There are many more incidents where sros save lives. You need a new talking point.

There is literally not 1 example of an SRO saving a life.

Pick me! Pick me! I’ve seen it happen with my own eyes. I’ve worked with SROs and have witnessed them respond to crises in the building. I’ve seen them remove weapons from children, and I’ve seen them act as first responders when students have been hurt. Guess what? None of it was advertised. (Why would it be? It was just them doing their jobs.)

Still none of those examples are not SRO’s saving lives.

Grow up and google. We can post hundreds and you will still deny it.

Here is an article where a Sri saved a child. https://www.wdbj7.com/2023/02/02/montgomery-county-sro-saves-childs-life/

I'm sure you can find one or two rare cases where they did some good but there are many more where they did nothing or made schools less safe. Parkland and Uvalde come to mind.

Ok, those were two rare incidents years ago. You need new talking points. I cannot imagine the kids or parents of those schools don’t want Eros or more security after what happened. There are always bad seeds in every profession but the bad outweighs the good. Many of us are tried of the drugs and violence in the schools. The assaults, the rapes, the bullying and much more. How do you propose ending that!

DP here. I’m assuming you meant the good outweighs the bad, and I definitely agree.

Just to let you know, the PP doesn’t have a solution. I’m thinking PP is a high school child here just to have fun, hence the repeated vague statements and the inability to fully respond to a question like the one you posted above.

They constantly post the same one-liner. I think its an adult with graduated kids or kids not in MCPS who have no idea or don't care as they'd rather protect kids who are unable to behave or control themselves rather than protect the kids behaving and staff trying to do their jobs. Until it is their kid shot, stabbed, rapped or terrorized they will not care. OR, its their kids behaving this way and instead of addressing the behavior and getting their kid the help they need, they'd rather take away all consequences and blame others.

So you think brining guns into schools make them safer? sheesh

Sadly yes, I do. Since SRO's were removed and discipline was taking away things have only gotten worse. Whose kid is going to be stabbed, shot or raped next? Yours? Mine?

[Anonymous]

at Clarksburg HS
wusa9.com/article/news/education/fighting-continues-at-clarksburg-high-school-whistleblower-teachers-worry-for-safety/65-61561898-726e-4581-b5dd-27933b2f20be

[Anonymous]

How is it going with a CEO system, MCPS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How is it going with a CEO system, MCPS?

MCPS doesn't know itself.

This was revealed when they surveyed the public on how CEO 2.0 was going:

MCPD has not publicly shared how it feels the CEO 2.0 program is going either.