New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

post reply Forum Index » Soccer

◄ 1 2 3 ... 341 342 343 344 345 346 ► Go

Go to page...

02/25/2026 12:11

Subject: New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

quote

Anonymous

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see in the post that GA has added 2 new teams.

Carolina Core - girls club ranking/strength #507
KC Legends - girls club ranking/strength #214

yikes...

If you remove the 07/08 (1100 ranking) team which wont be around next season. What is the new math?

The younger teams 2012 and younger are pretty solid

and what if a dingo ran out in the street and ate your baby? what if's... lmao..GA hats crack me

What if an ecnl team plays pipeline? Does that count for anything?

Funny enough pipeline is actually better than a lot of GA teams! Be careful when you single out the bottom feeders

Lies—a local Aspire team defeated a Pipeline ECNL team at the Bethesda Showcase.

Which Aspire team? My impression is that Aspire is generally weaker than ECNL RL in the DMV, so genuinely curious if some clubs are stronger in the spectrum of Aspire.

Several ASPIRE teams have beaten ECNL National-level teams in past tournaments. The most recent example is from the Bethesda Premier Cup several months ago. If you check the scores, the top U14 girls bracket shows the SYC Aspire team beating Pipeline ECNL, and a U13 Aspire team from New York beating VDA’s 2013 ECNL side. It’s hard to take RL in Northern Virginia seriously when some of the big-name clubs—like BRYC, LMVSC, and Vienna—operate more like large rec programs than true competitive environments.

This is true. It is astonishing none of these clubs appear to be getting booted out of ECNL RL next year. Up and down the board for both girls and boys the clubs are at the bottom of the RL tables. And yet they are advertising themselves for tryouts as a ECNL national pathway. I think these clubs typically only get 2-6 new players at their tryouts as well.

How is this different from Aspire? Genuine question. I've heard that most of the Aspire teams in the DC area are fairly weak. This could (of course) change over time. I see one team (SYC) being mentioned as strong.

This is the 1st year for Aspire. Aspire only represents the girls side, where ECNL RL represents the boys and girls sides and has been around for much longer. SYC's 2012, 2013 and 201 Aspire teams are exceptionally strong and will likely all participate in the national championship. Every league has teams in the bottom of the standings, but its the up and down the board for all age groups (both male and female in the ECNL RL Case) that you can look at to determine if the Club maybe should not be in a certain league.

Also, it undermine's the credibility of a league if they claim to be a high level league and yet, do not hold clubs accountable for poor performance. Right now, you can really gauge the bottom level performers in ECNL RL, but it would be hard to single out a whole club in Aspire as bottom level performer.