I've had that happen too |
Well you have revealed yourself as a simple troll. There are many messages on this forum with those three words. But, that was not your claim. Your claim was that someone wants Trump impeached simply because he talked to a Russian. Obviously, that was not a serious statement and nobody here has that position. What I don't understand is why you don't simply admit that you weren't serious about the remark and that you don't actually believe it to be the case. Why continue this charade? |
There are times in the past I have done just this and you delete it flat out |
No you have not had that happen. You are lying. It is really unbelievable that you guys make up things out of whole cloth and then lie on top of that. Why do you bother coming to DCUM is all you are going to do is spread falsehoods? Go troll another site. |
Okay, if you have done "just this" let's see the screen captures. Obviously, you haven't done "just this". Why are you wasting everyone's time telling lies? |
I have had the same experience. |
They are on another system I won't have access to until next week. |
Are you liars all working together? I have never deleted your message when you linked to evidence supporting your argument. That is simply not something that I would do. You must really be desperate if you are resorting to this sort of lying. |
I'll be here. Can't wait to see them. |
When questioned you say the source unreliable, i.e. is not to your liking. |
Lol, you know what you should do Jeff? You should ask them for evidence where you did this. That will show them to make baseless charges against you! |
That may well be true, but that is not the claim that you are making. Your claim is that you linked to another post and that I deleted both your post and the post to which you linked. Again, just as has happened several times before, you have made a claim and then when I called you on it, you diverted to something else. Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different. |
Not to mention numerous threads I've posted, coming back an hour or two later... vanished.
Jeff is not fooling ANYONE. |
Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold! |
That may well happen. I delete a lot of threads for a lot of different reasons. But, that is not the accusation that was made about me. Why are you making this discussion about me? I thought you were interested in DWS and Imran Awan? It sounds to me like you just want to cry like little babies. |