Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different.

Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold!

Poor little baby. Do you need your mommy's breast? Can't handle someone criticizing his sources. Such tragedy. I didn't know you were such a snowflake.

[Anonymous]

This discussion is about you.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:This discussion is about you.

That's what you have made it. But, it's time to get back on topic. If you are unable to do that, I'll be glad to help you.

[Anonymous]

All of this is fascinating... An IT staffer took his ball, deleted all the emails that showed his stupidity, then ran back to Pakistan only to be caught by the good guys who don't believe in fake narratives, only the truth.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:All of this is fascinating... An IT staffer took his ball, deleted all the emails that showed his stupidity, then ran back to Pakistan only to be caught by the good guys who don't believe in fake narratives, only the truth.

Almost none of that is true. But, you are apparently one of the guys who not only believes in fake narratives, but spreads them.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different.

Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold!

Poor little baby. Do you need your mommy's breast? Can't handle someone criticizing his sources. Such tragedy. I didn't know you were such a snowflake.

Different poster here. I know you can block me and delete this, but I really think your insults are over the top.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different.

Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold!

Poor little baby. Do you need your mommy's breast? Can't handle someone criticizing his sources. Such tragedy. I didn't know you were such a snowflake.

Different poster here. I know you can block me and delete this, but I really think your insults are over the top.

NP but the one who called Jeff out on his deleting... I know my children get defensive when I catch their hands in the cookie jar without asking first. Jeff was caught and by his reaction it's obvious he needs a hug.

[Anonymous]

Even low energy Jeb is ripping on DWS (who I believe is his congressman) for her shady dealings with the Awans. "The incompetence and terrible judgment displayed by Debbie Wasserman Schultz and House Democrats is jarring."

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/05/jeb-bush-rips-wasserman-schultzs-terrible-judgment-in-house-it-scandal/

https://twitter.com/JebBush/status/893920376664862720


WSJ - The Scandal That Matters:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-scandal-that-matters-1501801333

Popcorn time.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different.

Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold!

Poor little baby. Do you need your mommy's breast? Can't handle someone criticizing his sources. Such tragedy. I didn't know you were such a snowflake.

Different poster here. I know you can block me and delete this, but I really think your insults are over the top.

NP but the one who called Jeff out on his deleting... I know my children get defensive when I catch their hands in the cookie jar without asking first. Jeff was caught and by his reaction it's obvious he needs a hug.

You didn't call me out, you told an outright lie. How do your children react when you falsely accuse them of stealing cookies and then when you are asked to back it up, you ignore the cookies and accuse them of something else?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Yes, if you use crappy sources, you can expect to be called on it. Several of you have said that you don't believe Awan's lawyer is a satisfactory source. Nothing unusual in this sort of thing. But, your accusation about we was quite different.

Crappy sources: anything Jeff doesn't agree with. NYTIMES, CNN, Newsweak, Huffpo, MSNBC... Gold!

Poor little baby. Do you need your mommy's breast? Can't handle someone criticizing his sources. Such tragedy. I didn't know you were such a snowflake.

Different poster here. I know you can block me and delete this, but I really think your insults are over the top.

NP but the one who called Jeff out on his deleting... I know my children get defensive when I catch their hands in the cookie jar without asking first. Jeff was caught and by his reaction it's obvious he needs a hug.

You didn't call me out, you told an outright lie. How do your children react when you falsely accuse them of stealing cookies and then when you are asked to back it up, you ignore the cookies and accuse them of something else?

I tell my kids I saw the cookies in there before and they're now gone. You and I are the only ones in the house and I didn't take them. Poor Jeff, when we catch you again deleting emails that make you look bad (trust me, if not me then others will do it), what will you do, delete it AGAIN?

[Anonymous]

Great first paragraph in this opinion - "Only someone as brazenly arrogant as Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz could claim her own irresponsible behavior as a civic virtue."

http://nypost.com/2017/08/04/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-pathetic-right-thing-defense/

Too bad America sees through the left's victimization righteousness.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I tell my kids I saw the cookies in there before and they're now gone. You and I are the only ones in the house and I didn't take them. Poor Jeff, when we catch you again deleting emails that make you look bad (trust me, if not me then others will do it), what will you do, delete it AGAIN?

There you go again. The allegation that I am protesting is not that I delete posts that make me look bad. "Posts that make me look bad" is open to a lot of interpretation and I assume that I am guilty of doing that in some people's minds (though I would say that I have other reasons for deleting them and there are still plenty of posts around that make me look bad). The allegation that I am protesting is that when posters have linked to other posts to prove their points, I have removed both posts. Multiple users claimed that I did this, but when I objected, they have all changed their complaint to something else. Just like you did here.

False accusations are very frustrating. The repeated pattern of moving on to another allegation (also normally false) instead of simply retracting is even more frustrating. The fact that we now have several pages of off-topic posts mostly about me simply due to the inability of you guys to support accusations you have made (this divergence started when a poster claimed that posters here want Trump indicted simply for talking to a Russian and I asked for a link to one such post) is most frustrating of all.

So, let me be open about this. Further posts that are not on topic for this thread or do not provide evidential support for one of the previous posts will be removed. You make whatever allegations you want to about that, but I'm tired of going in circles with you.

[Anonymous]

This letter to the Editor was published this morning on the Sun Sentinel's website. The guy is spot on, unlike Jeff who thinks the media did their job:

Another hard hitting investigative article by the Sun Sentinel. Wait, it was an editorial apology.?

You are 100 percent correct that the Imran Awan investigation is ongoing ["The non-case against Wasserman Schultz" editorial], but why does the Sun Sentinel feel compelled to come to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's defense? Instead, why not request the payroll records of Awan and his family and do an audit? Was the pay commensurate with the time and effort? Compare the dates of pay with travel records to see if they were in fact in town when they were being paid. Interview the other Democratic members of Congress for their reason for firing him. I'm sure it was not for racial or religious intolerance. You have the resources that we don't. Use them.

Most of us don't see or hear the right-leaning outlets you reference, but when I hear the veiled threat she gave to the Capitol Police office about consequences, you have to question her motives.

David Hixson, Hollywood

[Anonymous]

Awan smashes the hard drives lol!!!!!! then tries to run.

[Anonymous]

The sharks in SoFl smell blood in the water and see a vulnerable candidate in the 2018 primaries

http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/gop-attorney-carlos-reyes-jumps-cd23-race-long-shot-bid-against-debbie-wasserman-schultz