Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There were no further details beyond what was quoted. My apologies.


I did my own research. Awan's car dealership allegedly took a loan from an Iraqi named Dr. Ali Al-Attar. Here is more info about him:


Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, wrote that Attar "was observed in Beirut, Lebanon conversing with a Hezbollah official" in 2012–shortly after the loan was made. Attar has also been accused of helping provoke the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq as a leader of Iraqi dissidents opposed to Saddam Hussein.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/21/congressional-computer-admins-in-criminal-probe-owed-money-to-hezbollah-connected-fugitive/

If you ignore the obtuse wording, you see that Attar was one of the US supported dissidents who encouraged the US invasion of Iraq (he lived in MD and VA). He was seen conversing with a Hezbollah official in Beirut. Keep in mind that Hezbollah holds 12 seats in Lebanon's Parliament and its members hold many official roles in Lebanon's government. So, by itself, this allegation doesn't amount to much.


It amounts to his meeting with Hezbollah - a designated terrorist organization (as designation it maintained theoughout the Alabama administration, BTW).

Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_groups

Just because the terrorist group has a few political members within the Lebanese parliament doesn't make it any less of a designated terror group.

I would not say this "doesn't amount to much."


The guy had a conversation with a Hezbollah official. We have no information about the topic or circumstances of the conversation. Given the official roles of many Hezbollah officials in Lebanon's government, there could be perfectly innocent explanations. Again, why do so many of you insist on jumping to conclusions rather than waiting for the evidence?


Trump talked to a Russian. Impeach!!! Lol


I don't think anyone here has said that and I certainly haven't. Is there any reason you cannot stick to a fact-based reality? Maybe you should go to our Entertainment forum and discuss fiction with some of those posters?
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There were no further details beyond what was quoted. My apologies.


I did my own research. Awan's car dealership allegedly took a loan from an Iraqi named Dr. Ali Al-Attar. Here is more info about him:


Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, wrote that Attar "was observed in Beirut, Lebanon conversing with a Hezbollah official" in 2012–shortly after the loan was made. Attar has also been accused of helping provoke the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq as a leader of Iraqi dissidents opposed to Saddam Hussein.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/21/congressional-computer-admins-in-criminal-probe-owed-money-to-hezbollah-connected-fugitive/

If you ignore the obtuse wording, you see that Attar was one of the US supported dissidents who encouraged the US invasion of Iraq (he lived in MD and VA). He was seen conversing with a Hezbollah official in Beirut. Keep in mind that Hezbollah holds 12 seats in Lebanon's Parliament and its members hold many official roles in Lebanon's government. So, by itself, this allegation doesn't amount to much.


It amounts to his meeting with Hezbollah - a designated terrorist organization (as designation it maintained theoughout the Alabama administration, BTW).

Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_groups

Just because the terrorist group has a few political members within the Lebanese parliament doesn't make it any less of a designated terror group.

I would not say this "doesn't amount to much."


The guy had a conversation with a Hezbollah official. We have no information about the topic or circumstances of the conversation. Given the official roles of many Hezbollah officials in Lebanon's government, there could be perfectly innocent explanations. Again, why do so many of you insist on jumping to conclusions rather than waiting for the evidence?


Trump talked to a Russian. Impeach!!! Lol


I don't think anyone here has said that and I certainly haven't. Is there any reason you cannot stick to a fact-based reality? Maybe you should go to our Entertainment forum and discuss fiction with some of those posters?


Do you read your own forum?
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.
Anonymous
Maybe this forum should be only fact-based.
We should all see the list of credible sources.
Would CNN qualify?
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There were no further details beyond what was quoted. My apologies.


I did my own research. Awan's car dealership allegedly took a loan from an Iraqi named Dr. Ali Al-Attar. Here is more info about him:


Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, wrote that Attar "was observed in Beirut, Lebanon conversing with a Hezbollah official" in 2012–shortly after the loan was made. Attar has also been accused of helping provoke the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq as a leader of Iraqi dissidents opposed to Saddam Hussein.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/21/congressional-computer-admins-in-criminal-probe-owed-money-to-hezbollah-connected-fugitive/

If you ignore the obtuse wording, you see that Attar was one of the US supported dissidents who encouraged the US invasion of Iraq (he lived in MD and VA). He was seen conversing with a Hezbollah official in Beirut. Keep in mind that Hezbollah holds 12 seats in Lebanon's Parliament and its members hold many official roles in Lebanon's government. So, by itself, this allegation doesn't amount to much.


It amounts to his meeting with Hezbollah - a designated terrorist organization (as designation it maintained theoughout the Alabama administration, BTW).

Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_groups

Just because the terrorist group has a few political members within the Lebanese parliament doesn't make it any less of a designated terror group.

I would not say this "doesn't amount to much."


The guy had a conversation with a Hezbollah official. We have no information about the topic or circumstances of the conversation. Given the official roles of many Hezbollah officials in Lebanon's government, there could be perfectly innocent explanations. Again, why do so many of you insist on jumping to conclusions rather than waiting for the evidence?


DP: evidence can be direct and circumstantial. Both are equally admissible in the court.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


I wished I owned a website that could cover up my lies from the past?

It's okay Jeff, we all fail. Hugs (got that from the relationship forum)
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:DP: evidence can be direct and circumstantial. Both are equally admissible in the court.


This is true. In this case, we have no evidence at all other than that there may have been some sort of conversation.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


I wished I owned a website that could cover up my lies from the past?

It's okay Jeff, we all fail. Hugs (got that from the relationship forum)


You are beyond delusional if you think I have scoured this website removing any post that would help you prove your point. If that is what you really believe, please seek mental health assistance (not joking). If, as is more likely, you are simply trolling, please stop.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Try posting the text of the U.S. Constitution in a thread. He'll delete it.

I did. He deleted it. The Constitution FFS. Meanwhile, threads about Trump... create them all day!


Hey it works! I tried posting part of 1A a page back. PRESTO!

Deleted.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Try posting the text of the U.S. Constitution in a thread. He'll delete it.

I did. He deleted it. The Constitution FFS. Meanwhile, threads about Trump... create them all day!


Hey it works! I tried posting part of 1A a page back. PRESTO!

Deleted.


I initially left it there. Then, someone responded to it talking about Universities and unions. Are those things really relevant to this topic? That's why off-topic posts get removed.
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


I wished I owned a website that could cover up my lies from the past?

It's okay Jeff, we all fail. Hugs (got that from the relationship forum)


You are beyond delusional if you think I have scoured this website removing any post that would help you prove your point. If that is what you really believe, please seek mental health assistance (not joking). If, as is more likely, you are simply trolling, please stop.


Of course you don't silly, you just wait until a DP attaches a link and calls you out, then you delete both. Delusional I maybe in many area's, but on this, my friend just isn't so... Facts matter.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


I wished I owned a website that could cover up my lies from the past?

It's okay Jeff, we all fail. Hugs (got that from the relationship forum)


You are beyond delusional if you think I have scoured this website removing any post that would help you prove your point. If that is what you really believe, please seek mental health assistance (not joking). If, as is more likely, you are simply trolling, please stop.


Of course you don't silly, you just wait until a DP attaches a link and calls you out, then you delete both. Delusional I maybe in many area's, but on this, my friend just isn't so... Facts matter.


Let's make this simple. Can you find a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian? If so, take a screen capture of it. Then, post a link here. If I delete both your post and that post, you will have evidence. In fact, you can screen capture your own post also.

I really don't understand this repeated pattern of you folks making unsupported allegations and the when I call you on it trying to turn the conversation to be about me. Just stop. You made a claim. Can you back it up or not? If not, it's not that hard to admit you were wrong. Nobody knows who you are and nobody cares that "Anonymous" posted complete BS and then owned up to it.

Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


I wished I owned a website that could cover up my lies from the past?

It's okay Jeff, we all fail. Hugs (got that from the relationship forum)


You are beyond delusional if you think I have scoured this website removing any post that would help you prove your point. If that is what you really believe, please seek mental health assistance (not joking). If, as is more likely, you are simply trolling, please stop.


Of course you don't silly, you just wait until a DP attaches a link and calls you out, then you delete both. Delusional I maybe in many area's, but on this, my friend just isn't so... Facts matter.


Let's make this simple. Can you find a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian? If so, take a screen capture of it. Then, post a link here. If I delete both your post and that post, you will have evidence. In fact, you can screen capture your own post also.

I really don't understand this repeated pattern of you folks making unsupported allegations and the when I call you on it trying to turn the conversation to be about me. Just stop. You made a claim. Can you back it up or not? If not, it's not that hard to admit you were wrong. Nobody knows who you are and nobody cares that "Anonymous" posted complete BS and then owned up to it.



Oh goodie, its popcorn time!
Anonymous
jsteele wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you read your own forum?


Not every message, but maybe you can provide a link to a post saying that Trump should be impeached simply because he talked to a Russian.


Search Trump Russia impeach

Enjoy

Now show me the hard expvidnce Trump colluded with the Russians
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Try posting the text of the U.S. Constitution in a thread. He'll delete it.

I did. He deleted it. The Constitution FFS. Meanwhile, threads about Trump... create them all day!


Hey it works! I tried posting part of 1A a page back. PRESTO!

Deleted.


Because he's a commie
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: