Not sure. It’s stating the absolute obvious, though. |
There is probably more information than we know about. Gun could have been improperly stored or other signs were ignored. Can a 14 year old even own a gun or is it technically the father’s? |
Four people are dead because he bought his 13-year old an AR-15. Go ahead, own guns…but pay the price for the hell you unleash. |
HE GAVE HIS 14-YEAR-OLD WHO HAD BEEN INVESTIGATED BY THE FBI A GUN. FOR CHRISTMAS. |
You know, like it’s your pencil’s fault for you beings a bad speller (before Gore gave us the internet). |
|
The father is charged because he bought a 13 year old an AR15 rifle and ammunition after having a sit down with the Sheriff’s office about posted threats made by his kid.
The FBI does not interview every person about every threat made on line. They do pass along information to local authorities if their team believes further investigation is warranted. That was done with this kid. An interview was conducted and a determination made by the Sheriff’s department not to take additional action. Then, after the interview, Dad bought the kid his own AR15. Eight months later the kid used his AR15 to shoot up his school. Dad obviously ignored the issues his kid was having and bought his 13 year old a gun for a Christmas present. The gun was then used by the kid to kill others. What we do not know at this point - was the gun and ammunition locked in a gun safe that the kid was able to smash open to obtain? Or were they easily accessible? Judging by the charges - it seems unlikely that the gun and ammunition were locked up in a manner the kid could not easily defeat - if at all. In the Michigan cases parents of a school shooter were convicted of manslaughter charges and serving lengthy sentences. These charges are going to be normal and expected now when your child hurts others. |
|
|
From what I've read, the dysfunction in Colt's family can't all be ascribed to his mother. Her parents also point to the dad being verbally abusive, screaming at Colt. And Colt's mother had drug charges after she left her husband. So if she was using all the years before, what was he doing about it? And if the dad was yelling at schools because Colt was being "pinched and touched" (what was up with that?) what was he doing about getting some psychological help for Colt as well?
This doesn't get said much, but whenever these things happen my heart also breaks for the kid who ended up broken to the point of doing this. |
Haven't you see examples of the MAGA Christmas cards where everyone in the family gets an AR-15 for Christmas, including the 3 year old daughter who gets one in pink camo? Under the law, nothing a kid owns belongs to the kid (with the exception of states that have laws to protect the earnings and assets of child entertainers). In my state, the paycheck my 14 year old got for his Saturday job at Taco John's was legally my money. The law does not allow guns to be SOLD to minors (21 for semi-auto handguns I think) but that's only about the transaction. I don't know what the law is regarding private sales which is moot in this instance. And yes, signs were ignored. This is the third case I know of (Lanza, Crumbley) where the intent by the parents were to steer the kid away from other things (in this case video games per the father). |
We can’t go on “probablies” here. FBI failed. Why should father think son is dangerous if FBI don’t? |
Probably trying to help her. JFC |
He can explain himself at trial. A 14-year old with an AR-15 is inherently dangerous. One that gets visited by the FBI, many times more so. |
| Wondering if school administrators will be also arrested for allowing Colt to be relentlessly bullied? |
| Don't give your 14 year old access to a machine gun if you don't want to go to prison if he turns out to be unstable. People in this country are obsessed with guns. |
| Yet the FBI protected this kid by doing absolutely nothing when they were alerted. They must be investigated. Or is this just another FBI failure and part of life and we should get used to it? |