Why aren’t the dads on GLPs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Skinny men are gross and Glp 1 lose muscle mass unless insane regimen of work out and diet, so it’s not as easy an improvement

I just love these GLP1 threads. Three today alone. I really love to see, for the 1000th time, how some frumpy hausfrau thinks some rando she knows nothing about looks gross.

Lol men have been freely commenting on women's bodies forever! Taste of their own medicine if they don't like being examined now. At least you can-- and should-- avoid the commentary by not opening the thread, a privilege women have never been afforded.

OP, my partner took it. He dropped 30 pounds in a couple months, looked and felt great, but... his tushy disappeared. He had such a great ass before, and then it just went away

You are just as horrible as the men you are bit$ing about. Truly awful. You complain about men objectifying women and then you go on to do EXACATLY that to you own husband.

Lol cry about it loser. Then after you dry your eyes, work on your reading skills. Focus on the part where I said he looks great. Also examine your own sad brain that can't distinguish between an observation and a complaint.

NP, you did not, you made a sad face about his butt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wish my DH would. Men are too comfortable and shouldn't be surprised when they're not getting any.

Use your words. You're not a baby.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men aren’t insecure.

Yes they are!

They are but not about their weight.

Where are you hanging out that there are a bunch of fat men? Rich guys are active, work out, ski, they aren't overweight and if they were they aren't anymore.

Clearly you don't know a lot of rich men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men aren’t insecure.

Yes they are!

They are but not about their weight.

Where are you hanging out that there are a bunch of fat men? Rich guys are active, work out, ski, they aren't overweight and if they were they aren't anymore.

Clearly you don't know a lot of rich men.

It's you who doesn't. Obviously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men don't wear clothing that shows off their GLP shape

What is glp shape?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

Ripped and Jacked are two different concepts.

Ripped = low body fat, moderate muscle, count calories and it’s very achievable at any age.

Jacked = low body fat, a lot more muscle like daywne Johnson, difficult for most men in their 20s too.

[Anonymous]

My husband is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

If you are a GLP and still working out hard during the medication how or why do you lose muscle?
Like you literally just get weaker? Go from benching 300 to 250 during the weight loss?

I get losing muscle if you are not using them but seems weird that your body would not be using the fat stores first for energy conversion than muscle; which is a lot more work for the body compared to fat conversion.

[Anonymous]

I know a lot of men that are on GLP-1s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

If you are a GLP and still working out hard during the medication how or why do you lose muscle?
Like you literally just get weaker? Go from benching 300 to 250 during the weight loss?

I get losing muscle if you are not using them but seems weird that your body would not be using the fat stores first for energy conversion than muscle; which is a lot more work for the body compared to fat conversion.

NP. Weight loss is always a result of a combination of muscle and fat loss. Even the most precise weight lifters lose some muscle when they cut. There is no perfect formula to make it’s 100 fat loss and 0 muscle loss. Losing 7 pounds of muscle out 60 total pounds lost is very impressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

If you are a GLP and still working out hard during the medication how or why do you lose muscle?
Like you literally just get weaker? Go from benching 300 to 250 during the weight loss?

I get losing muscle if you are not using them but seems weird that your body would not be using the fat stores first for energy conversion than muscle; which is a lot more work for the body compared to fat conversion.

NP. Weight loss is always a result of a combination of muscle and fat loss. Even the most precise weight lifters lose some muscle when they cut. There is no perfect formula to make it’s 100 fat loss and 0 muscle loss. Losing 7 pounds of muscle out 60 total pounds lost is very impressive.

Sorry for my naïveté, but as collegiate wrestler I’ve dropped 15lbs in days to make weight. A lot of it water of course but no muscle or strength loss. Sucking weight impacts endurance more than strength in my experience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For older men (or women) who were not athletic younger or lifted weights consistently it is very difficult to build muscle in your 40s and beyond.

I am man who has never had serious weight issues but have gotten out of shape now and again. But as a father of teens I believe showing that eating healthy and exercising regularly sets a good example. Fat men should do whatever they need to be healthy just like fat women.

Getting ripped without the benefit of muscle memory may not be possible for most people, no matter what GLP or diet they pursue.

Which is why they are on testosterone. It's no secret that it's hard to put on muscle after 40, and it gets harder every year. It's fair to assume that if you see a ripped guy over 60, he's on T.

Getting prescribed testosterone takes an act of god from a US doctor. Even if you are point above the FDA chart no go. A point below? You get some microdose to get to the lowest level.

Testosterone is the most restricted prescription out there. Even more than opioids now.

No, a ripped guy in his 60s may have a testosterone prescription but not enough to get him jacked unless shady doctor willing to risk career.

This is where the whole peptide or anabolic steroids come in; or crazy discipline to look that - and I would say closer to 55 dudes have to be serious and not on pharmaceutical train to pull it off.

This.

See a ripped older dude then he worked out when younger and works his butt off in the gym. I am 60 and while not ripped am pretty muscular and not on anything. I work out in gym with trainer three times a week and run 5 times a week. Also worked out heavy most of my life. It is possible to gain muscle at any age -- it just takes work. I was on a glp1 and lost 60 pounds, 7 of which was muscle, which is a lot less than normal because of the workouts.

If you are a GLP and still working out hard during the medication how or why do you lose muscle?
Like you literally just get weaker? Go from benching 300 to 250 during the weight loss?

I get losing muscle if you are not using them but seems weird that your body would not be using the fat stores first for energy conversion than muscle; which is a lot more work for the body compared to fat conversion.

NP. Weight loss is always a result of a combination of muscle and fat loss. Even the most precise weight lifters lose some muscle when they cut. There is no perfect formula to make it’s 100 fat loss and 0 muscle loss. Losing 7 pounds of muscle out 60 total pounds lost is very impressive.

Sorry for my naïveté, but as collegiate wrestler I’ve dropped 15lbs in days to make weight. A lot of it water of course but no muscle or strength loss. Sucking weight impacts endurance more than strength in my experience.

It would be unlikely that you actually measured what you lost to determine whether you lost muscle. You likely performed as expected at a wrestling match and called it a day. We are not talking about 20 year olds. We are talking about 40+.

[Anonymous]

I know several husbands who are on GLP‘s. Frankly, they look like they have cancer and skin is saggy. A couple go to the gym and it’s a little better but not by much.