A black kid might score well. Their parents might expect the child to score well. But will the teachers and administration expect the child to score well? Will he have any same race classmates who are scoring well? |
Curious how this factors? |
Same. It has to be the same person insinuating black people don’t care if a potential mayor sends their kids to private school. Like great schools fail black kids that aren’t at risk or have a high needs disability. I would never send my child to Friendship. |
It doesn’t. This person is so clearly not a teacher. It is more important for a child to see successful black adults. And often the children don’t even share their scores with each other. |
Did you ever think that maybe they were awkwardly trying to be inclusive of you? And hoping a cohort would stick together? When you say you are leaving the shared space, it can feel like a judgment that the shared space was harmful for your child. |
Peer effect matter, Fryer has a bunch of papers on this https://www.educationnext.org/acting-white/ |
| ( that’s not the original article but it’s a nice critical commentary) |
You don’t think peer groups matter? You don’t think being the only MC non white kid in a class matters? Of course it does. Stop acting like kids don’t see race. |
| Maury is heavily IB. If you live IB and are joining in a relatively younger grade, it will be good/fine. If you are talking about joining as an oob lottery student in upper elementary, its a slightly different analysis. |
The question wasn’t if they see ethnicity, it was if there’s other ‘smart’ kids of the same ethnicity. No, that does not matter as long as there are plenty of examples of ‘smart’ people of their ethnicity. Ps. We are all the same race, unless you are a decently smart ape?
|
Huh? Peer effects are extremely important and sizable (that’s Fryer’s JPubE), the teacher/mentor effects are empirically pretty small and underpowered. I think the mentor effect paper is probably “true” they just need better power, but “who” is smart really does matter. |
The research actually backs up what I said pretty well. The whole framework around this comes from Claude Steele and Joshua. What they found is that the real problem is identity safety, meaning a child needs to believe that someone like them can succeed in a given domain. That belief comes from visible successful adults way more than it comes from a classmate sitting next to them. The strongest study people love to cite for race matching in schools is Thomas Dee's "Teachers, Race, and Student Achievement in a Randomized Experiment.”And here is the thing about that study: it is about TEACHERS. Not peers. Not classmates. The research on stereotype threat also specifically notes that providing role models who demonstrate proficiency reduces or eliminates the threat effect entirely (Blanton, Crocker and Miller, 2000). It does not say those role models have to be peers. The important thing is seeing someone like you succeed, and a thriving adult makes that case a lot more powerfully than a fellow 10 year old. |
Stereotype threat is p hacked to hell. It’s not real, and it’ll disappear from the literature over the next decade. Classic bad social psychology from the early times. The teacher effect paper is real, but when you only have 4 clusters, the effect is not robust. Note it ended up in a pretty weak journal because it couldn’t survive robustness checks at higher tier journals. The peer effect literature is recent, strong, has a very good theory behind it, and most importantly replicates. |
No. They were not being inclusive. This individual doesn’t have kids that are the same age as my children. She never bothered to even say hello to me or be nice to my children. At one of our first conversations she launched into me about the importance of sending my kids to Eastern. I note that her daughter goes to SWW now. But it was really important for “diversity” to have our family attend Eliot and Eastern. I never once mentioned that we were thinking of leaving Maury and transferring to a charter school. This woman just launched into her lecture without prompting. You should know she’s not the only one. |
Fair point on stereotype threat, I’ll give you that one. But the peer effects literature you’re citing actually undercuts your own argument when you look closely. The well-replicated finding is that high-achieving peers help students generally. When you control for peer achievement level, the race component mostly disappears. “Peers’ race, ethnicity, income, and parental education have at most very little effect on students’ performance after accounting for peers’ achievement” (Hoxby and Weingarth 2023). So the effect you’re pointing to is about being around high achievers, not same-race high achievers. |