Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[quoteLet’s not forget all her posts on her blog The Tig praising her daddy. She seemed to have a close, good relationship with him until shortly before the wedding. What is telling is that she never introduced Harry to him, even before his media shenanigans. I think Meghan loved her dad but was embarrassed of him. He is a Hollywood blue-collar type who would likely stand out like a sore thumb in Royal crowds. Meghan knew this, and dreaded introducing him to her new family. Luckily for her, he couldn’t help being himself and talking to the media (much as Meghan can’t help herself!). This gave her an excuse to cut him out of her life. She then could avoid introducing Thomas to the Queen (can you imagine that scene?!).

I do think how she’s treated her father is highly indicative of who she really is. She’ll climb over and cut off anyone who doesn’t help her get where she thinks she should be. She’s guilty of the exact same thing she cut off her dad for.

100% this. To this day Harry has not met her father - at least not publicly acknowledged - can't say for sure. It's not like he's a murderer or anything he's just not "good" enough.

Great point! Even before the wedding staged pap stuff.

Something very bizarre with her frankly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[quoteLet’s not forget all her posts on her blog The Tig praising her daddy. She seemed to have a close, good relationship with him until shortly before the wedding. What is telling is that she never introduced Harry to him, even before his media shenanigans. I think Meghan loved her dad but was embarrassed of him. He is a Hollywood blue-collar type who would likely stand out like a sore thumb in Royal crowds. Meghan knew this, and dreaded introducing him to her new family. Luckily for her, he couldn’t help being himself and talking to the media (much as Meghan can’t help herself!). This gave her an excuse to cut him out of her life. She then could avoid introducing Thomas to the Queen (can you imagine that scene?!).

I do think how she’s treated her father is highly indicative of who she really is. She’ll climb over and cut off anyone who doesn’t help her get where she thinks she should be. She’s guilty of the exact same thing she cut off her dad for.

100% this. To this day Harry has not met her father - at least not publicly acknowledged - can't say for sure. It's not like he's a murderer or anything he's just not "good" enough.

100%!!!!

I have been saying this since day 1.

She is deeply insecure of her past and her blue collar family. NO ONE was "good enough" to meet the royals and her new blue blooded husband. As a substitute, she invited Hollywood celebes she had never even met!! to their wedding to represent her side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[quoteLet’s not forget all her posts on her blog The Tig praising her daddy. She seemed to have a close, good relationship with him until shortly before the wedding. What is telling is that she never introduced Harry to him, even before his media shenanigans. I think Meghan loved her dad but was embarrassed of him. He is a Hollywood blue-collar type who would likely stand out like a sore thumb in Royal crowds. Meghan knew this, and dreaded introducing him to her new family. Luckily for her, he couldn’t help being himself and talking to the media (much as Meghan can’t help herself!). This gave her an excuse to cut him out of her life. She then could avoid introducing Thomas to the Queen (can you imagine that scene?!).

I do think how she’s treated her father is highly indicative of who she really is. She’ll climb over and cut off anyone who doesn’t help her get where she thinks she should be. She’s guilty of the exact same thing she cut off her dad for.

100% this. To this day Harry has not met her father - at least not publicly acknowledged - can't say for sure. It's not like he's a murderer or anything he's just not "good" enough.

Great point! Even before the wedding staged pap stuff.

Something very bizarre with her frankly.

+1. Her dad is fat and ugly, let’s be honest. The pics of her walking down the aisle with the future king looked way better than if she were with her dad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

DP. Of course "a couple [trying] to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen." But do you really not understand that doing such a thing as a "surprise" (as seems to be MM's MO), given that (1) the BRF isn't just an ordinary family and operates on schedules that are planned months in advance, and (2) their extremely strained relationship with the family over the past 1.5 years is at best, a poorly thought out idea, and at best, manipulative and does in fact make it seem like the event is all about Meghan and her whims?

I'll break it down. In this hypothetical (before I'm accused of attributing things to her that she hasn't done, I realize the PP was speculating), if she brings the baby as a "surprise", she puts the onus on everyone to scramble to accommodate meeting the baby (lest they aren't able to change their schedules, and subsequently this is leaked and the public is told that it's "because of racism"). The Queen isn't your 90-year old great-grandmother, she has a rigid schedule and, given that Diana wasn't a member of the BRF at the time of her death, she may not even be in London when H&M are there. Also, if Lilibet's presence is announced ahead of time, people will expect it. It won't be as newsworthy as if they "surprise" everyone by bringing her, which is of course what they want (positive attention). Of course bringing the baby to her grandmother's statue unveiling is normal. A "surprise" would be self-serving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

DP. Of course "a couple [trying] to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen." But do you really not understand that doing such a thing as a "surprise" (as seems to be MM's MO), given that (1) the BRF isn't just an ordinary family and operates on schedules that are planned months in advance, and (2) their extremely strained relationship with the family over the past 1.5 years is at best, a poorly thought out idea, and at best, manipulative and does in fact make it seem like the event is all about Meghan and her whims?

I'll break it down. In this hypothetical (before I'm accused of attributing things to her that she hasn't done, I realize the PP was speculating), if she brings the baby as a "surprise", she puts the onus on everyone to scramble to accommodate meeting the baby (lest they aren't able to change their schedules, and subsequently this is leaked and the public is told that it's "because of racism"). The Queen isn't your 90-year old great-grandmother, she has a rigid schedule and, given that Diana wasn't a member of the BRF at the time of her death, she may not even be in London when H&M are there. Also, if Lilibet's presence is announced ahead of time, people will expect it. It won't be as newsworthy as if they "surprise" everyone by bringing her, which is of course what they want (positive attention). Of course bringing the baby to her grandmother's statue unveiling is normal. A "surprise" would be self-serving.

I'm the immediate PP and caught a typo. The bolded line in the post above should read: "Of course "a couple [trying] to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen" is normal.

[Anonymous]

Yes, Thomas Markle, a man who currently has a relationship with one of his three children, who two separate women decided to divorce, did nothing wrong for Meghan to cut him off.

Also all of his kids turned out poorly. Samantha is a child abuser and seems to have no life outside of Meghan. Thomas Sr is an alcoholic and also a domestic abuser. And Meghan, doesn’t bother me as much as she does you guys, seems quite self-involved. Considering these kids don’t have the same mom the common denominator is him.

So what if Meghan said some nice stuff about him a decade ago. You have to be blind to think he is a normal, nice man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Thomas Markle, a man who currently has a relationship with one of his three children, who two separate women decided to divorce, did nothing wrong for Meghan to cut him off.

Also all of his kids turned out poorly. Samantha is a child abuser and seems to have no life outside of Meghan. Thomas Sr is an alcoholic and also a domestic abuser. And Meghan, doesn’t bother me as much as she does you guys, seems quite self-involved. Considering these kids don’t have the same mom the common denominator is him.

So what if Meghan said some nice stuff about him a decade ago. You have to be blind to think he is a normal, nice man.

+1. He’s really awful. The stuff he’s said about releasing information about her until she agrees to meet with him. That’s blackmail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Thomas Markle, a man who currently has a relationship with one of his three children, who two separate women decided to divorce, did nothing wrong for Meghan to cut him off.

Also all of his kids turned out poorly. Samantha is a child abuser and seems to have no life outside of Meghan. Thomas Sr is an alcoholic and also a domestic abuser. And Meghan, doesn’t bother me as much as she does you guys, seems quite self-involved. Considering these kids don’t have the same mom the common denominator is him.

So what if Meghan said some nice stuff about him a decade ago. You have to be blind to think he is a normal, nice man.

Who said he was normal and nice, PP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Thomas Markle, a man who currently has a relationship with one of his three children, who two separate women decided to divorce, did nothing wrong for Meghan to cut him off.

Also all of his kids turned out poorly. Samantha is a child abuser and seems to have no life outside of Meghan. Thomas Sr is an alcoholic and also a domestic abuser. And Meghan, doesn’t bother me as much as she does you guys, seems quite self-involved. Considering these kids don’t have the same mom the common denominator is him.

So what if Meghan said some nice stuff about him a decade ago. You have to be blind to think he is a normal, nice man.

I would expect that Prince Harry would meet the father of his girlfriend/fiancee/wife, whoever that is, wherever he is, whether he is in London or LA or Mexico or behind bars or anywhere.

But Harry didn't and hasn't. Ever. They have spoken by phone but never in person. It just doesn't make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

Right but factchecking the article it states that Lilibet will stay behind. Let's see if that is the case or if Meghan does her usual M.O. of upstaging anyone and everyone on their special days/events.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, Thomas Markle, a man who currently has a relationship with one of his three children, who two separate women decided to divorce, did nothing wrong for Meghan to cut him off.

Also all of his kids turned out poorly. Samantha is a child abuser and seems to have no life outside of Meghan. Thomas Sr is an alcoholic and also a domestic abuser. And Meghan, doesn’t bother me as much as she does you guys, seems quite self-involved. Considering these kids don’t have the same mom the common denominator is him.

So what if Meghan said some nice stuff about him a decade ago. You have to be blind to think he is a normal, nice man.

I would expect that Prince Harry would meet the father of his girlfriend/fiancee/wife, whoever that is, wherever he is, whether he is in London or LA or Mexico or behind bars or anywhere.

But Harry didn't and hasn't. Ever. They have spoken by phone but never in person. It just doesn't make sense.

So much for Harry being cultured and classy. Really tarnishing that royal brand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

Right but factchecking the article it states that Lilibet will stay behind. Let's see if that is the case or if Meghan does her usual M.O. of upstaging anyone and everyone on their special days/events.

According to the link provided above, only Prince Harry will attend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

Right but factchecking the article it states that Lilibet will stay behind. Let's see if that is the case or if Meghan does her usual M.O. of upstaging anyone and everyone on their special days/events.

That article seemed like it was mostly pulled out of someone's butt. If they baby comes, I doubt it will be a surprise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.

All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm.
There is zero reason for Meghan to be there.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html

There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions

1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing
2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising

She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana.

It's weird how your first sentence would be a positive good thing but you then immediately twist it into something horrible for no apparent reason. It is very normal for a couple to try to ensure someone like a great grandparent in their 90s would have an opportunity to meet a great grandchild and to use a well timed family event to make it happen.

Right but factchecking the article it states that Lilibet will stay behind. Let's see if that is the case or if Meghan does her usual M.O. of upstaging anyone and everyone on their special days/events.

According to the link provided above, only Prince Harry will attend.

UPDATED: 10:26 EDT, 16 June 2021 - earlier this a.m. they were reporting that should accompany him.