
This was proven false and has already been debunked in this here thread... again, the level of misinformation around Meghan is bizarre. |
Proven false, how exactly? Where are all the old friends of Megan who were at her wedding (or who are around her in general now?) it seems to be all celebs she's met since Harry. |
There's a Wikipedia page that takes 2 seconds to skim to prove that rumor is false. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wedding_guests_of_Prince_Harry_and_Meghan_Markle#Friends_of_Prince_Harry_and_Ms_Meghan_Markle There are plenty of long-time friends of Meghan listed here. Are you also conveniently forgetting the outpouring of support from Meghan's friends in the lead-up to the Oprah interview? About 95% of the sh*t you read about Meghan online is just blatantly false, or otherwise twisted to fit a specific narrative. |
+1 And easy google search provides the guest list and the relationship of the guest to either the bride or the groom. The list I found list several long time friends of the bride. But I’m not going to spoon feed you, you’ll have to look for yourself. If you got time to spread misinformation, maybe spend a little time gathering facts. |
The obsessed haters are hoping that by simply repeating certain mistruths ad infinitum, they'll start sounding a bit more like the truth. The sad reality is their tactic actually works. Misinformation is rampant in today's social media-driven infoscape. |
DP: Or maybe the “anonymous source” is Samantha. That would cover the Post, and possibly garner more sympathy and attention than Samantha would get if she identified herself. |
People, please learn how to be media literate. If you even so much as read the hundreds of headlines about Meghan Markle that are published each day in the tabloid papers, you'll see a pattern. Here's a made-up example to illustrate:
Headline: MEGHAN [or Harry, or both] FURIOUS AT THE QUEEN Article lede: Meghan is secretly fuming due to the fact that the Queen seems to favor Kate Middleton over her, royal expert says. Top comment: "Wow, what a horrid, jealous, narcissistic demon of a woman. Can't she just keep her mouth shut for once?" |
I don’t know...I get the feeling Doris likes to keep her own company. |
^*Doria |
I think we all know how disingenuous this "fact-checking" bs is. Picking apart stories for minutiae to prove that other's opinions are wrong is just well, wrong. Snopes does this constantly, find one detail to harp about as not being correct and then state the entire theory, article or premise is incorrect. You can argue about tiny details and not the big picture where everyone else is at. |
Get the popcorn this show is gonna be goooooood.
All those deals must be falling apart - they will worm their way back into the firm. There is zero reason for Meghan to be there. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9691889/Meghan-Markle-support-Prince-Harry-unveiling-Princess-Dianas-statue.html |
Let’s not forget all her posts on her blog The Tig praising her daddy. She seemed to have a close, good relationship with him until shortly before the wedding. What is telling is that she never introduced Harry to him, even before his media shenanigans. I think Meghan loved her dad but was embarrassed of him. He is a Hollywood blue-collar type who would likely stand out like a sore thumb in Royal crowds. Meghan knew this, and dreaded introducing him to her new family. Luckily for her, he couldn’t help being himself and talking to the media (much as Meghan can’t help herself!). This gave her an excuse to cut him out of her life. She then could avoid introducing Thomas to the Queen (can you imagine that scene?!). I do think how she’s treated her father is highly indicative of who she really is. She’ll climb over and cut off anyone who doesn’t help her get where she thinks she should be. She’s guilty of the exact same thing she cut off her dad for. |
There are two concrete claims in that article amidst a bunch of sensationalized assumptions 1) Meghan will be at the unveiling, which seems like a good and normal thing 2) Lilibet will not be making the trip, which to me is actually a little surprising |
[quoteLet’s not forget all her posts on her blog The Tig praising her daddy. She seemed to have a close, good relationship with him until shortly before the wedding. What is telling is that she never introduced Harry to him, even before his media shenanigans. I think Meghan loved her dad but was embarrassed of him. He is a Hollywood blue-collar type who would likely stand out like a sore thumb in Royal crowds. Meghan knew this, and dreaded introducing him to her new family. Luckily for her, he couldn’t help being himself and talking to the media (much as Meghan can’t help herself!). This gave her an excuse to cut him out of her life. She then could avoid introducing Thomas to the Queen (can you imagine that scene?!).
I do think how she’s treated her father is highly indicative of who she really is. She’ll climb over and cut off anyone who doesn’t help her get where she thinks she should be. She’s guilty of the exact same thing she cut off her dad for. 100% this. To this day Harry has not met her father - at least not publicly acknowledged - can't say for sure. It's not like he's a murderer or anything he's just not "good" enough. |
She will probably bring her along as a "surprise" for the Queen to meet. The woman will make everything about herself on a day celebrating Diana. |