Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.

From what I have read, Wint is not the sharpest tool in the shed. If he had an accomplice, the police will find him. They will use their tried and true detective techniques to build a strong case. I have faith that those involved in this brutal, senseless crime will be brought to justice. I just hope that the people in DC who serve on the jury will be able to discern the facts from the crap the defense attorneys will likely throw out there and will convict these scumbags.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.

From what I have read, Wint is not the sharpest tool in the shed. If he had an accomplice, the police will find him. They will use their tried and true detective techniques to build a strong case. I have faith that those involved in this brutal, senseless crime will be brought to justice. I just hope that the people in DC who serve on the jury will be able to discern the facts from the crap the defense attorneys will likely throw out there and will convict these scumbags.

you mean the 20-something, federal government or non-profit worker hipster wannabes with multiple advanced degrees and too much time on their hands?

or did you mean something else? the nineties called -- they want you to come back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.

From what I have read, Wint is not the sharpest tool in the shed. If he had an accomplice, the police will find him. They will use their tried and true detective techniques to build a strong case. I have faith that those involved in this brutal, senseless crime will be brought to justice. I just hope that the people in DC who serve on the jury will be able to discern the facts from the crap the defense attorneys will likely throw out there and will convict these scumbags.

you mean the 20-something, federal government or non-profit worker hipster wannabes with multiple advanced degrees and too much time on their hands?

or did you mean something else? the nineties called -- they want you to come back.

I was referring to the liberals who seem to defend the indefensible in too many circumstances. But, this isn’t the political forum so I refrained from stating that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there no new development in this case beyond capturing of Wint?

Search for Accomplices.
Read in another discussion site that his brother is being looked at closer. Possible owner of the box truck/garage on wheels.

Was that on Websleuths?

I should think if he was the technician for the amerifleet vehicle, that information would be readily available from Amerifleet.

It was crime watchers. Several pages on the topic …might have to scan. See link
http://www.crimewatchers.net/forum/index.php?threads/savvas-and-amy-savopoulos-found-dead-inside-their-home-in-northwest-d-c-arrest-may-14-2015.591/page-19

Yes--you would think that info on the boxcar owner/rental/tech might be readily available... to law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Breaking News from CNN - 06/01/2015 @6:30 p.m: Forensic analysis discovers traces of blood from one of the victims on Darron Wint's shoes.

[Anonymous]

Am I the only one that thinks that Wint may have acted alone INSIDE the house and that he didn't call on help until after the murders and fire? I think he's totally capable if he was scary enough, demanding enough, threatening enough and had the right weapon. If he had the child in his hands, he could get that family to comply. Wouldn't you, if it was the only option to avoid seeing your child hurt?

I feel like maybe the police just aren't ready to admit that they're wrong when saying so confidently that there are others.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Breaking News from CNN - 06/01/2015 @6:30 p.m: Forensic analysis discovers traces of blood from one of the victims on Darron Wint's shoes.

Posted date incorrectly s/b 06/2/2015

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.

From what I have read, Wint is not the sharpest tool in the shed. If he had an accomplice, the police will find him. They will use their tried and true detective techniques to build a strong case. I have faith that those involved in this brutal, senseless crime will be brought to justice. I just hope that the people in DC who serve on the jury will be able to discern the facts from the crap the defense attorneys will likely throw out there and will convict these scumbags.

you mean the 20-something, federal government or non-profit worker hipster wannabes with multiple advanced degrees and too much time on their hands?

or did you mean something else? the nineties called -- they want you to come back.

Have you ever served on a jury? I have. Two, in fact - murder trials. Your whole post is ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Smith's. Right across the street from the hotel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks that Wint may have acted alone INSIDE the house and that he didn't call on help until after the murders and fire? I think he's totally capable if he was scary enough, demanding enough, threatening enough and had the right weapon. If he had the child in his hands, he could get that family to comply. Wouldn't you, if it was the only option to avoid seeing your child hurt?

I feel like maybe the police just aren't ready to admit that they're wrong when saying so confidently that there are others.

Nope, I think he could have absolutely acted alone. Kid is resting in bed. Wint knocks on door. Nanny answers. He quickly grabs her covering her mouth. Ties her up and duck tapes her, then takes care of kid. Gets nanny to call AS and gets her home. Wint gets AS and then SS is next. One at a time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I hope to god I am wrong but I dont think there will be another arrest. Well perhaps accomplice after the fact or aiding a fugitive but nothing directly connected to the homicides. Whoever did this with wint is his homie someone he is down for. You dont commit this type of crime with an acquaintance. He has no incentive to cooperate with the police. There is no death penalty and there is nothing that he could possibly say that would allow him to ever walk out of prison. It doesn't behoove him tp snitch when the rest of his life will be spent in a place that honors those who don't snitch and demonize those who do.


From what I have read, Wint is not the sharpest tool in the shed. If he had an accomplice, the police will find him. They will use their tried and true detective techniques to build a strong case. I have faith that those involved in this brutal, senseless crime will be brought to justice. I just hope that the people in DC who serve on the jury will be able to discern the facts from the crap the defense attorneys will likely throw out there and will convict these scumbags.


you mean the 20-something, federal government or non-profit worker hipster wannabes with multiple advanced degrees and too much time on their hands?

or did you mean something else? the nineties called -- they want you to come back.


I was referring to the liberals who seem to defend the indefensible in too many circumstances. But, this isn’t the political forum so I refrained from stating that.

You are a fucking nut job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks that Wint may have acted alone INSIDE the house and that he didn't call on help until after the murders and fire? I think he's totally capable if he was scary enough, demanding enough, threatening enough and had the right weapon. If he had the child in his hands, he could get that family to comply. Wouldn't you, if it was the only option to avoid seeing your child hurt?

I feel like maybe the police just aren't ready to admit that they're wrong when saying so confidently that there are others.

Nope, I think he could have absolutely acted alone. Kid is resting in bed. Wint knocks on door. Nanny answers. He quickly grabs her covering her mouth. Ties her up and duck tapes her, then takes care of kid. Gets nanny to call AS and gets her home. Wint gets AS and then SS is next. One at a time.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one that thinks that Wint may have acted alone INSIDE the house and that he didn't call on help until after the murders and fire? I think he's totally capable if he was scary enough, demanding enough, threatening enough and had the right weapon. If he had the child in his hands, he could get that family to comply. Wouldn't you, if it was the only option to avoid seeing your child hurt?

I feel like maybe the police just aren't ready to admit that they're wrong when saying so confidently that there are others.

I think there were more than 2 persons involved, Possibly his brothers, one of whom has a rap sheet as long as Darron's.

1. The green construction vests were worn by the group to appear to be working on the street and not call attention as outsiders.
2. More than one person would have been needed to move about the house while controlling the hostages as they set about disarming security systems and looking for money they assumed to be in the house.
3. The $40,000 was delivered by Wallace to the car in the garage. A second person would need to go retrieve it while Wint kept the hostages in check.
4. The Porsche was driven away at around 10:30, possibly by Wint's brother, Darrell who has close-cropped hair.
5. After torching the Porsche, the brother flees to the Lanham area with half of the money. He chose this area because he was familiar with the neighborhood.
6. Wint then sets about destroying evidence and killing the hostages. He gets gasoline from the garage, sets the house on fire and departs the scene with the rest of the money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Breaking News from CNN - 06/01/2015 @6:30 p.m: Forensic analysis discovers traces of blood from one of the victims on Darron Wint's shoes.

Thanks for posting. Let Robin Ficker try to explaain that away. Makes me sick.