new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on folks. This isn’t that hard to figure out.



Turned to this after the records began to be searched...

Sorry. Links failed.

So she goes from this:
“Official complaint” Re: harassment and worse
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235420456837996544?s=21[/twitter]

And repeated the next day.
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235613338769297408?s=21[/twitter]
To this once the record would be searched to verify her charge
“Intake form” “left it vague” etc...
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1256745905832615938?s=21[/twitter]

Cute. She links to the Medium post that she doctored heavily right before going public in March 2020 (see the link up thread about her heavy editing of that Medium post). And she adds the bit about being fired that contradicts her earlier tweet about how she left because her boyfriend pleaded with her to join him in the Midwest.

As with many women who have been assaulted by prominent men, she may have been conflicted about the potential consequences of exposing the full truth. She is after all, a lifelong Democrat.

She's been a Bernie/Putin acolyte for a while now, so longer a Dem. Her story suddenly changed when Sanders was losing the nomination, keep up.

In an April 2019 interview Tara Reade "said of Biden: 'I wasn’t scared of him, that he was going to take me in a room or anything. It wasn’t that kind of vibe.'"

Stockholm Syndrome. Look it up.

Once again: not 20 years later. Get new talking points from your masters.

And not from one incident. It develops over months and years. Look it up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on folks. This isn’t that hard to figure out.



Turned to this after the records began to be searched...

Sorry. Links failed.

So she goes from this:
“Official complaint” Re: harassment and worse
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235420456837996544?s=21[/twitter]

And repeated the next day.
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235613338769297408?s=21[/twitter]
To this once the record would be searched to verify her charge
“Intake form” “left it vague” etc...
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1256745905832615938?s=21[/twitter]

Cute. She links to the Medium post that she doctored heavily right before going public in March 2020 (see the link up thread about her heavy editing of that Medium post). And she adds the bit about being fired that contradicts her earlier tweet about how she left because her boyfriend pleaded with her to join him in the Midwest.

As with many women who have been assaulted by prominent men, she may have been conflicted about the potential consequences of exposing the full truth. She is after all, a lifelong Democrat.

That could be true Re: uncomfortable->harassment->assault

Not true Re: “chickened out” -> “I told 3 people and filed an official complaint” -> “2 people + OC” -> “1 person + OC” -> “OC” -> “minimized OC” -> “clipboard Intake form”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on folks. This isn’t that hard to figure out.



Turned to this after the records began to be searched...

Sorry. Links failed.

So she goes from this:
“Official complaint” Re: harassment and worse

And repeated the next day.

To this once the record would be searched to verify her charge
“Intake form” “left it vague” etc...

Cute. She links to the Medium post that she doctored heavily right before going public in March 2020 (see the link up thread about her heavy editing of that Medium post). And she adds the bit about being fired that contradicts her earlier tweet about how she left because her boyfriend pleaded with her to join him in the Midwest.

As with many women who have been assaulted by prominent men, she may have been conflicted about the potential consequences of exposing the full truth. She is after all, a lifelong Democrat.

That could be true Re: uncomfortable->harassment->assault

Not true Re: “chickened out” -> “I told 3 people and filed an official complaint” -> “2 people + OC” -> “1 person + OC” -> “OC” -> “minimized OC” -> “clipboard Intake form”

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

+1. The president doesn’t get to investigate his opponents/get his Senate proxies to investigate his opponents, while his own many sexual assaults go uninvestigated. Not even McConnell seems to think this is a good idea.

The decline of democracy, indeed. Third world tin pot dictator, indeed. Jesus, folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on folks. This isn’t that hard to figure out.



Turned to this after the records began to be searched...

Sorry. Links failed.

So she goes from this:
“Official complaint” Re: harassment and worse
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235420456837996544?s=21[/twitter]

And repeated the next day.
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1235613338769297408?s=21[/twitter]
To this once the record would be searched to verify her charge
“Intake form” “left it vague” etc...
[twitter] https://twitter.com/readealexandra/status/1256745905832615938?s=21[/twitter]

Cute. She links to the Medium post that she doctored heavily right before going public in March 2020 (see the link up thread about her heavy editing of that Medium post). And she adds the bit about being fired that contradicts her earlier tweet about how she left because her boyfriend pleaded with her to join him in the Midwest.

I wish someone would publish all of the problems with her second story in one place. Reporters have not done a great job of keeping up.

When the story changes and there is backpeddling hours and days apart, it is hard to stay on top of it.

[Anonymous]

Biden was thoroughly vetted before Obama selected him for his running mate, yet this Tara Reade alleged incident never came up.

It’s more likely that Trump operatives are paying her and anyone who can corroborate false accusations out of desperation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on folks. This isn’t that hard to figure out.



Turned to this after the records began to be searched...

Sorry. Links failed.

So she goes from this:
“Official complaint” Re: harassment and worse

And repeated the next day.

To this once the record would be searched to verify her charge
“Intake form” “left it vague” etc...

Cute. She links to the Medium post that she doctored heavily right before going public in March 2020 (see the link up thread about her heavy editing of that Medium post). And she adds the bit about being fired that contradicts her earlier tweet about how she left because her boyfriend pleaded with her to join him in the Midwest.

As with many women who have been assaulted by prominent men, she may have been conflicted about the potential consequences of exposing the full truth. She is after all, a lifelong Democrat.

That could be true Re: uncomfortable->harassment->assault

Not true Re: “chickened out” -> “I told 3 people and filed an official complaint” -> “2 people + OC” -> “1 person + OC” -> “OC” -> “minimized OC” -> “clipboard Intake form”

+1

+1. Also, she repeats here the claim that she was fired. Logically, any “consequences“ had already happened long ago and there was no longer anything to fear from coming out with the truth.

Even though in an earlier blog she said she was already going to leave for a job offer in California, but her boyfriend begged her to join him in the Midwest, which was a segue into how her boyfriend/husband started to abuse her. If her husband physically abused her, I could understand there being some deep issues towards men in general. That doesn’t excuse making up accusations, if that’s what she’s doing.

I guess I’d appreciate an investigation into the circumstances of her departure from Biden’s office. (And of the president’s alleged assaults too, because this isn’t a dictatorship where only the president’s opponents get investigated).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden was thoroughly vetted before Obama selected him for his running mate, yet this Tara Reade alleged incident never came up.

It’s more likely that Trump operatives are paying her and anyone who can corroborate false accusations out of desperation.

+1. See the new accusation that popped up for about 2 hours yesterday, until it surfaced that Biden couldn’t have been there because he had sinus surgery that week. It’s upthread.

[Anonymous]

Oh, did the attendees' list get published? I missed that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, did the attendees' list get published? I missed that.

2008 was the only year that Biden couldn’t attend that dinner. He appeared on video instead because he was recovering from sinus surgery. So Christine “I’m not a witch” O’Donnell’s niece is a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, did the attendees' list get published? I missed that.

2008 was the only year that Biden couldn’t attend that dinner. He appeared on video instead because he was recovering from sinus surgery. So Christine “I’m not a witch” O’Donnell’s niece is a liar.

+1. Even Fox News, in its brief coverage of this allegation yesterday, felt it needed to mention Biden’s sinus surgery. I linked to the Fox piece upthread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden was thoroughly vetted before Obama selected him for his running mate, yet this Tara Reade alleged incident never came up.

It’s more likely that Trump operatives are paying her and anyone who can corroborate false accusations out of desperation.

In the Fox comment section on their many articles on Reade today, some poor con is wondering if Reade is a Dem plant to make Cons look bad, a “false flag operation.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You people clamoring for an official investigation - Reade filed a police report weeks ago. Biden asked yesterday for all of the relevant documents to be searched for and released. How are those not official investigations? What else specifically do you want?

You know what they want. They want Ukraine to make motions about investigating Hunter Biden.

This is a political hit job.

So let’s move on and demand investigations into Donald’s many, many sexual assaults. He’s stalling on supplying his DNA for E. Jean Carroll’s suit. Why, do you think? Why would he stall if she isn’t right?

Really? You can't think of any good reasons why he may not want to bow to her every demand?

I can think of dozens. Beginning with.... she is a loon.

Kind of like Tara?