How likely for save act to pass senate?

[Anonymous]

Good lord. I was married 30 years ago in and born 50 years ago in other states.
I guess I could dig up the marriage certificate. I do have a passport, but all my original documents were destroyed in a move ten years ago. I would have to reapply for the MC and BC certified copies.

Yeah, it's a great idea to make this has hard as humanly possible when I have been voting with a license forever and VOTER FRAUD IS NEGLIGIBLE>

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While Supreme Court approved Indiana voter ID, Indiana provides a free ID for anyone who needs it for voting purposes. That is the catch here. If we want to have voter ID without violating the Constitution, it must be provided for free.

I have posted the same numerous times in this thread. If the GOP included funding for a state ID card used for voting, then no one would complain. This is a poll tax and unduly complicated, particularly for married women who don't have the access or money to jump through the hoops to comply. Ironically, this impacts more women in red states than blue ones.

It's easy to think this was accidental but there is no way they didn't intend for this confusion to happen. They just want deniability until its a done deal. They need to give Susan Collins and her ilk cover. "i had no idea i was voting for the end of democracy."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good lord. I was married 30 years ago in and born 50 years ago in other states.
I guess I could dig up the marriage certificate. I do have a passport, but all my original documents were destroyed in a move ten years ago. I would have to reapply for the MC and BC certified copies.

Yeah, it's a great idea to make this has hard as humanly possible when I have been voting with a license forever and VOTER FRAUD IS NEGLIGIBLE>

Well gee republicans hate women republican women are brain dead

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While Supreme Court approved Indiana voter ID, Indiana provides a free ID for anyone who needs it for voting purposes. That is the catch here. If we want to have voter ID without violating the Constitution, it must be provided for free.

I have posted the same numerous times in this thread. If the GOP included funding for a state ID card used for voting, then no one would complain. This is a poll tax and unduly complicated, particularly for married women who don't have the access or money to jump through the hoops to comply. Ironically, this impacts more women in red states than blue ones.

It's easy to think this was accidental but there is no way they didn't intend for this confusion to happen. They just want deniability until its a done deal. They need to give Susan Collins and her ilk cover. "i had no idea i was voting for the end of democracy."

Also will not be surprised if certain states/jurisdictions raise prices as well as thresholds to obtain these documents - "prove to us that you were married here, then we will release the certificate" etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:While Supreme Court approved Indiana voter ID, Indiana provides a free ID for anyone who needs it for voting purposes. That is the catch here. If we want to have voter ID without violating the Constitution, it must be provided for free.

I have posted the same numerous times in this thread. If the GOP included funding for a state ID card used for voting, then no one would complain. This is a poll tax and unduly complicated, particularly for married women who don't have the access or money to jump through the hoops to comply. Ironically, this impacts more women in red states than blue ones.

It's easy to think this was accidental but there is no way they didn't intend for this confusion to happen. They just want deniability until its a done deal. They need to give Susan Collins and her ilk cover. "i had no idea i was voting for the end of democracy."

Also will not be surprised if certain states/jurisdictions raise prices as well as thresholds to obtain these documents - "prove to us that you were married here, then we will release the certificate" etc.

They're already rolling back programs that allowed libraries and nonprofits to process these document requests for people. They'll be shortening hours, closing satellite offices etc. We've seen the same song and dance around polling places as they've eliminated or restricted early voting in key districts.

Republicans are cheaters, preparing to cheat to ensure we never have another democratic election.

The idea of changing course to actually appeal to voters is just too crazy. They've decided to dismantle our democracy instead.

[Anonymous]

If this passes, it’s another step away from protecting privacy rights. It also undermines federalism and massively expands the federal government.

Surprising the GOP would support this given its virulent rejection of HR1 “for the people” in 2021 on the grounds that it would…. wait for it…. federalize elections! But now it’s a problem???

[Anonymous]

Strange how the party that won the House, Senate and White House is claiming widespread voter fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women that marry get the form to change your voters registration when you have a name change and also change your ID at the same time.

You change your drivers license and passport at the same time so all of your ID's match.

That doesn’t change the name on your birth certificate. If you do not have a passport, the SAVE Act would require you to show a drivers license and a birth certificate to register to vote. If the name on the birth certificate doesn’t match the drivers license (like because you got married), it’s a problem according to the law.

Just keep your name. You can answer to whatever name you want whenever you want, but officially just keep your own name.

Ever heard of a marriage certificate?
This is not hard.

Then make men present their marriage verification if their wives changed their names so men can vote

[Anonymous]

I guess women will just have to stop changing their name.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess women will just have to stop changing their name.

THIS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republicans don't care if this actually passes or not. At the end of the day, it's simply propaganda to perpetuate the false claims of voter fraud. It won't pass and every time Democrats win an election, Republicans will scream "voter fraud!! That's why they were against requiring proof of citizenship to vote! They want illegals to vote so they can win!" And all the MAGA idiots eat it up.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Strange how the party that won the House, Senate and White House is claiming widespread voter fraud.

They only claim voter fraud when they lose. And the only way they can win is by making it difficult for the majority of people to vote

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women that marry get the form to change your voters registration when you have a name change and also change your ID at the same time.

You change your drivers license and passport at the same time so all of your ID's match.

That doesn’t change the name on your birth certificate. If you do not have a passport, the SAVE Act would require you to show a drivers license and a birth certificate to register to vote. If the name on the birth certificate doesn’t match the drivers license (like because you got married), it’s a problem according to the law.

Just keep your name. You can answer to whatever name you want whenever you want, but officially just keep your own name.

Ever heard of a marriage certificate?
This is not hard.

Then make men present their marriage verification if their wives changed their names so men can vote

+1. Putting in measures that disproportionately disenfranchise only women is discriminatory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

ICE should have deported Elon musk long ago for violating the terms of his visa.