What happens to Kamala’s momentum now the DNC is over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

Or, she’s a babbling idiot. Much more likely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is the interview with both of them? Why not separate interviews for each?

This is a guess on my part.

Harris and Walz are campaigning together in Georgia starting tomorrow. CNN is headquartered in Atlanta, so it makes sense that the interview is with CNN while they’re in Georgia.

Walz still does not have much name recognition. I can’t remember the numbers exactly, but something like 40% of Americans don’t know anything about him. Given that he has high approvals among the people that know him, it makes sense then to try and introduce him to a wider audience. A joint interview will serve that purpose very well. People that won’t tune in just for him (apparently Vance has done a bunch of interviews; did anyone care?) will more likely tune in because Harris is also there. It will also give the audience the opportunity to see how they work together.

I would love to see a Trump-Vance joint interview.

They already had one back in July.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New York Times is starting to turn on her also.

"Joy is not a strategy"

The “joy” strategy just makes her look clueless.

Joy is to explain her nervous laughter.

Reagan was joyful but he knew how to deliver lines without world salad and he was much older than Kamala.

Yes Reagan knew how to deliver lines because he was an actor, doesn’t mean much.

And joy is just a contrast to fear. Trump has nothing to offer but fear. Even Reagan knew that America is about optimism not pessimism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

Or, she’s a babbling idiot. Much more likely.

Says the one whose dear leader likes to blather about boats, batteries, sharks and Hannibal Lecter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is the interview with both of them? Why not separate interviews for each?

Because most people aren’t going to watch more than one interview. The political junkies might want more, but most people don’t.

Trump and Vance did it too, I assume for similar reasons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

Or, she’s a babbling idiot. Much more likely.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She likes outer space.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is the interview with both of them? Why not separate interviews for each?

This is a guess on my part.

Harris and Walz are campaigning together in Georgia starting tomorrow. CNN is headquartered in Atlanta, so it makes sense that the interview is with CNN while they’re in Georgia.

Walz still does not have much name recognition. I can’t remember the numbers exactly, but something like 40% of Americans don’t know anything about him. Given that he has high approvals among the people that know him, it makes sense then to try and introduce him to a wider audience. A joint interview will serve that purpose very well. People that won’t tune in just for him (apparently Vance has done a bunch of interviews; did anyone care?) will more likely tune in because Harris is also there. It will also give the audience the opportunity to see how they work together.

I would love to see a Trump-Vance joint interview.

They already had one back in July.

They’ve done every Sunday talk show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New York Times is starting to turn on her also.

"Joy is not a strategy"

The “joy” strategy just makes her look clueless.

Joy is to explain her nervous laughter.

Reagan was joyful but he knew how to deliver lines without world salad and he was much older than Kamala.

Yes Reagan knew how to deliver lines because he was an actor, doesn’t mean much.

And joy is just a contrast to fear. Trump has nothing to offer but fear. Even Reagan knew that America is about optimism not pessimism.

Kamala's "joy campaign" is nothing more than an effort to attempt to separate her from the current administration, which she is very much an active part of, and distract from the policies that have caused the voters to believe that we are heading on the wrong track. Can't talk about the policies? Talk about joy. Try to convince people that you will fix the problems (that you actually broke).

Trump and Vance are just reminding people who is in charge and that things can and will be better if they are booted from office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New York Times is starting to turn on her also.

"Joy is not a strategy"

The “joy” strategy just makes her look clueless.

Joy is to explain her nervous laughter.

Reagan was joyful but he knew how to deliver lines without world salad and he was much older than Kamala.

Yes Reagan knew how to deliver lines because he was an actor, doesn’t mean much.

And joy is just a contrast to fear. Trump has nothing to offer but fear. Even Reagan knew that America is about optimism not pessimism.

I was joyful when our border was secure and there wasn’t a land war in Europe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She likes outer space.

And, yellow school buses. Don't forget the school buses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

Or, she’s a babbling idiot. Much more likely.

Says the one whose dear leader likes to blather about boats, batteries, sharks and Hannibal Lecter.

+1. Talk about babbling, Lordy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is the interview with both of them? Why not separate interviews for each?

Because most people aren’t going to watch more than one interview. The political junkies might want more, but most people don’t.

Trump and Vance did it too, I assume for similar reasons.

Trump and Vance did a joint interview. And, they have done numerous solo interviews. Each of them.
Kamala and Walz? Nada.