ENCL Nationals - Girls

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

rumor has it surf is practicing in the james river near tidewater drive to stay cool while still maintaining their resistance training. Beware if the surf

Those surf players are dirty.

Most DCUM comment of the day haha

Can't handle a team being dominant over your DC's team, call them dirty or over-age lol

[Anonymous]

I’ve heard Bethesda 2010 players yell all kinds of slurs while playing. They also flop anytime they get the chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

Is this discussion over an 8th grade girls game?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

Is this discussion over an 8th grade girls game?

Yep. It is funny reading posts on the great tactical and strategic decisions made by coaches who rarely change formation or players. If they are coaching 8th graders they are not a great coach.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

Is this discussion over an 8th grade girls game?

Yep. It is funny reading posts on the great tactical and strategic decisions made by coaches who rarely change formation or players. If they are coaching 8th graders they are not a great coach.

Dunce and Ignorant statement.

[Anonymous]

Yep. Yet you make your sage comments in response...(sniff, sniff) smellls like you got Unioned!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

rumor has it surf is practicing in the james river near tidewater drive to stay cool while still maintaining their resistance training. Beware if the surf

Those surf players are dirty.

Union 2010 parents cry every time somebody touches their baby. Then blame the refs and call the other team dirty. It happened a lot this spring.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

rumor has it surf is practicing in the james river near tidewater drive to stay cool while still maintaining their resistance training. Beware if the surf

Those surf players are dirty.

I've never seen SD Surf play dirty at at age.

In fact their parents sign a contract that they won't scream, yell, coach, etc from the sidelines. If coaches hear anything from the sidelines it gets reported to the DOC and players can/will get booted. Surf takes this very seriously.

They are annoyingly good.

I urge you too look up "dirty" on urban dictionary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve heard Bethesda 2010 players yell all kinds of slurs while playing. They also flop anytime they get the chance.

Not true. Great, kind group of girls and families. This is why all the best players are leaving their teams for this super team with natty dreams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surf is not overlooking BSC, so I’d expect a 2-0 Surf win, dominating the ball wearing out BSC in the Richmond heat and making the game look easy. Surf has a whole plan for arriving to VA early, go start breathing in the humidity and all, shoot…they have likely already arrived. Fortunately their playing style will help them to a 2-0 no frills win but any honest observers will agree BSC never has a chance but it won’t be a 10-0 or 6-0 or even 4-0 game. It’s too hot out there and it’s too competitive now for any teams to get Unioned!

rumor has it surf is practicing in the james river near tidewater drive to stay cool while still maintaining their resistance training. Beware if the surf

Those surf players are dirty.

I've never seen SD Surf play dirty at at age.

In fact their parents sign a contract that they won't scream, yell, coach, etc from the sidelines. If coaches hear anything from the sidelines it gets reported to the DOC and players can/will get booted. Surf takes this very seriously.

They are annoyingly good.

I urge you too look up "dirty" on urban dictionary

Nope, not true. If you'd like I can point you to teams that do play "dirty".

I think Surf maintains composure on the sidelines to annoy opponents even more when they don't play dirty and still win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to the Bethesda game against Surf.

Surf should win by 4-5 goals unless their subs give up a backdoor cover in the second half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2010s Union had a roster of 15 through the season and two players left (did not travel to Seattle) so they were down to 13. No coach in their right mind goes to playoffs with 12 field players (one of the 13 is a goalie). Made sense to bring 2011s as subs. Had Brave 2010s not made playoffs at the last minute, Union would have rostered a few Brave players on their team for playoffs instead.

No one is saying they should not take additional players to add to the 12 players. But the issue is that those players were not fit to play as they were just coming from injury and the other player bearly made the 2011 team. There were other 2011 or 2010RL players that were in form, hence the favourtism, politics and an insult to those 2011/2010RL players and families. That is why the 2010 and 2011 parents are upset.

Well said and glad you included the 2010 RL. This poster has it is exactly correct.

Most times, the younger ECNL player is better than the on age RL player. They will play quicker. This happens all the time at every club.

You know this is not true in this case so stop making this up. These players are coming from injury (have not played in more than 4 months) are quicker?? You are delusional !!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2010s Union had a roster of 15 through the season and two players left (did not travel to Seattle) so they were down to 13. No coach in their right mind goes to playoffs with 12 field players (one of the 13 is a goalie). Made sense to bring 2011s as subs. Had Brave 2010s not made playoffs at the last minute, Union would have rostered a few Brave players on their team for playoffs instead.

No one is saying they should not take additional players to add to the 12 players. But the issue is that those players were not fit to play as they were just coming from injury and the other player bearly made the 2011 team. There were other 2011 or 2010RL players that were in form, hence the favourtism, politics and an insult to those 2011/2010RL players and families. That is why the 2010 and 2011 parents are upset.

Well said and glad you included the 2010 RL. This poster has it is exactly correct.

Most times, the younger ECNL player is better than the on age RL player. They will play quicker. This happens all the time at every club.

You know this is not true in this case so stop making this up. These players are coming from injury (have not played in more than 4 months) are quicker?? You are delusional !!

I mean they can bring whoever they want. The question is did they play meaningful minutes and impactful in the game for the win/ loss?

My guess is no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2010s Union had a roster of 15 through the season and two players left (did not travel to Seattle) so they were down to 13. No coach in their right mind goes to playoffs with 12 field players (one of the 13 is a goalie). Made sense to bring 2011s as subs. Had Brave 2010s not made playoffs at the last minute, Union would have rostered a few Brave players on their team for playoffs instead.

No one is saying they should not take additional players to add to the 12 players. But the issue is that those players were not fit to play as they were just coming from injury and the other player bearly made the 2011 team. There were other 2011 or 2010RL players that were in form, hence the favourtism, politics and an insult to those 2011/2010RL players and families. That is why the 2010 and 2011 parents are upset.

Well said and glad you included the 2010 RL. This poster has it is exactly correct.

Most times, the younger ECNL player is better than the on age RL player. They will play quicker. This happens all the time at every club.

You know this is not true in this case so stop making this up. These players are coming from injury (have not played in more than 4 months) are quicker?? You are delusional !!

I mean they can bring whoever they want. The question is did they play meaningful minutes and impactful in the game for the win/ loss?

My guess is no.

Meaningful minutes played.

Negatively impacted team.

[Anonymous]

Everyone who actually knows these teams knows it was purely political and not meant to actually change any result. The coaches involved ML/CW by doing this confirmed what has already been discussed about them on this board.