Reply to ENCL Nationals

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ENCL Nationals - Girls"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]2010s Union had a roster of 15 through the season and two players left (did not travel to Seattle) so they were down to 13. No coach in their right mind goes to playoffs with 12 field players (one of the 13 is a goalie). Made sense to bring 2011s as subs. Had Brave 2010s not made playoffs at the last minute, Union would have rostered a few Brave players on their team for playoffs instead.[/quote]

No one is saying they should not take additional players to add to the 12 players. But the issue is that those players were not fit to play as they were just coming from injury and the other player bearly made the 2011 team. There were other 2011 or 2010RL players that were in form, hence the favourtism, politics and an insult to those 2011/2010RL players and families. That is why the 2010 and 2011 parents are upset. [/quote]

Well said and glad you included the 2010 RL. This poster has it is exactly correct. 
[/quote]

Most times, the younger ECNL player is better than the on age RL player.  They will play quicker.  This happens all the time at every club. [/quote]

You know this is not true in this case so stop making this up. These players are coming from injury (have not played in more than 4 months) are quicker?? You are delusional !![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics