Senator Tuberville self id’s as white nationalist and wants white nationalists in military

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:sadly, there is no one there to provide a briefing

Randolph White could explain it to him.

I have watched this so many times and it still makes me smile.

[Anonymous]

JFC is this guy actually in the Klan or what

[Anonymous]

No Senator, it is not AN equal opportunity employer, it is the original equal opportunity employer.

Sheesh, talk about an ignorant fool.

[Anonymous]

Amazing to think, there are former football players from Auburn who played for this guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JFC is this guy actually in the Klan or what

A Venn diagram of the beliefs of the Klan and the GOP is like second/fourth contact of an eclipse. So yes.

[Anonymous]

Tommy Tuberville is a complete fraud and a disgrace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tommy Tuberville is a complete fraud and a disgrace.

It’s always the guys who shout the loudest about the military who are the worst to them.

He said he’d donate and he didn’t. He lied about his family service and rank. Now he’s screwing all these people and their families. Kids who are starting new schools, no less. This guy is an A grade a$$hole.

I hated military life - it was too hard to move all the time and have so little control over your life- and I understand why the secretaries are concerned that this will be the last straw for some people. You can count on some divorces too.

[Anonymous]

Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

Need 60. Check your math.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

Need 60. Check your math.

Show me where it says that in the constitution. You need to check the BS the senate democrats feed you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

Need 60. Check your math.

Show me where it says that in the constitution. You need to check the BS the senate democrats feed you.

Senate rules aren’t in the constitution. And they don’t have 50 plus Kamala on this issue because Manchin and Sinema aren’t on board with changing any Senate rules.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

Need 60. Check your math.

Show me where it says that in the constitution. You need to check the BS the senate democrats feed you.

The senate rules aren't in the constitution. idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why don’t the dems make Tommy actually have to stand in the floor of the senate and filibuster? That loser would fold by 5 pm as he gets the shakes because he is missing happy hour.

Senate rules, probably. Also I don’t think the Democrats have the votes to change the procedural rules.

If they have 50 plus the VP they have the votes. Time to get off your A$$ Chuck.

Need 60. Check your math.

Show me where it says that in the constitution. You need to check the BS the senate democrats feed you.

The senate rules aren't in the constitution. idiot.

Wow it took you that long time to figure it out…idiot?