Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

Dear god I worry about some of you.

The first amendment doesn’t say much about freedom of speech for people who aren’t Americans.

OMG.

You know so little about the first amendment you claim to value that it's shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

Dear god I worry about some of you.

The first amendment doesn’t say much about freedom of speech for people who aren’t Americans.

OMG.

You know so little about the first amendment you claim to value that it's shocking.

Lol. It’s obvious you’re a joke.

But for anyone else: I went to Harvard Law with honors and also have a degree in sociology with a specialization in social inequality and women’s rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

Dear god I worry about some of you.

The first amendment doesn’t say much about freedom of speech for people who aren’t Americans.

OMG.

You know so little about the first amendment you claim to value that it's shocking.

Lol. It’s obvious you’re a joke.

But for anyone else: I went to Harvard Law with honors and also have a degree in sociology with a specialization in social inequality and women’s rights.

So I mean if you insist, we can talk about how the first amendment pertains to H&M. But you should stop treating PPs like we don’t know what’s going on because many of us do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

Dear god I worry about some of you.

The first amendment doesn’t say much about freedom of speech for people who aren’t Americans.

OMG.

You know so little about the first amendment you claim to value that it's shocking.

Lol. It’s obvious you’re a joke.

But for anyone else: I went to Harvard Law with honors and also have a degree in sociology with a specialization in social inequality and women’s rights.

So I mean if you insist, we can talk about how the first amendment pertains to H&M. But you should stop treating PPs like we don’t know what’s going on because many of us do.

Also my family is interracial and my DD is biracial.

[Anonymous]

What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

I think she will study Katie Holmes and out the BRF in an untenable situation of being portrayed as unsafe for the children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Why would Charles have guardianship? The same way they were saying the Queen does now? If that’s the case I would imagine both stay in California. Even in a divorce I can’t imagine there being an outcome where I want to cede guardianship of my children to my parents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Harry has confessed to having mental problems and using drugs and alcohol to try to cope. And he’s also said his family is racist.

So if they split, MM is right where she wants to be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

You really sound crazy. Do you think anyone cares that he said this…oh well I guess you do.

The Queen will care. That is diplomacy 101 and Harry should have known better.

[Anonymous]

And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

You really sound crazy. Do you think anyone cares that he said this…oh well I guess you do.

The Queen will care. That is diplomacy 101 and Harry should have known better.

You bet she cares as do corporations and other organizations. There was significant media coverage over this. Yes, plenty of people do care. This was a major fcuk up and will cost him plenty.

[Anonymous]

Bill Maher discussed the arrival of the newest royal baby on his program Friday night. He called her the duchess of Santa Barbara and quipped, “Just what that house needs…more pissing and whining.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.