Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

Agree. Lilibet is just too personal. The Queen has other weapons at her disposal should they become necessary. If the Sussex babies really were IVF babies from surrogates it calls into question the line of succession. Cue the screeching "that's a conspiracy theory". Maybe it is, but if it is true and the Crown can prove it - tread carefully Harry and Meghan. You might keep your titles but your kids might not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

Agree. Lilibet is just too personal. The Queen has other weapons at her disposal should they become necessary. If the Sussex babies really were IVF babies from surrogates it calls into question the line of succession. Cue the screeching "that's a conspiracy theory". Maybe it is, but if it is true and the Crown can prove it - tread carefully Harry and Meghan. You might keep your titles but your kids might not.

They were likely IVF babies but they weren’t from surrogates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

Agreed. She's been more than patient with them, keep in mind these aren't some young, dumb 20 somethings, these are 40 or nearly 40-year-old people who are well aware of what they are doing. Enough is enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

Agree. Lilibet is just too personal. The Queen has other weapons at her disposal should they become necessary. If the Sussex babies really were IVF babies from surrogates it calls into question the line of succession. Cue the screeching "that's a conspiracy theory". Maybe it is, but if it is true and the Crown can prove it - tread carefully Harry and Meghan. You might keep your titles but your kids might not.

What is illegitimate about an IVF baby born via surrogate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

These are unusual tax issues. And the Sussexes don't have competent non-tax advisors, so I'm not sure why anyone would assume that this is different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And there you have it: Never Explain Never Complain policy is done:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9680303/Queens-war-Harry-Meghans-LA-spin-machine.html

"The insider last night denied that, stating, ‘No video call has taken place’, adding: ‘Friends of the Sussexes appear to have given misleading briefings to journalists about what the Queen had said and that took the whole thing over the edge. The Palace couldn’t deny the story that this was a mistruth.’ Ironically, Harry has spoken out against the ‘barrage of mistruths’ on social media."

'Her Majesty has instructed courtiers to correct any statements which misrepresent her private conversations or those of other senior Royals.'

Wow. If the Queen takes her gloves off, H&M will never know what hit them.

I personally think this is a mistake. The queen is above their drama, and should still stay silent when they say stupid shit and lie. For a narcissist the worst thing is to just be ignored, and that’s what the queen should do to them.

I see your point but she has to draw the line somewhere.

Agree. Lilibet is just too personal. The Queen has other weapons at her disposal should they become necessary. If the Sussex babies really were IVF babies from surrogates it calls into question the line of succession. Cue the screeching "that's a conspiracy theory". Maybe it is, but if it is true and the Crown can prove it - tread carefully Harry and Meghan. You might keep your titles but your kids might not.

What is illegitimate about an IVF baby born via surrogate?

UK laws.
https://www.quora.com/If-the-Duke-and-Duchess-of-Sussex-were-to-use-a-surrogate-would-that-child-still-be-in-line-for-the-throne

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you think will happen to the kids if they get a divorce? I’m in a UK based group and they seem to think the kids will go back to the UK. That if Charles is King when it happens then he will have guardianship of the kids and the US will send them over bc Harry is on a diplomat visa. I tried saying that was crazy and they will likely get 50/50 joint physical custody if they file in CA but I was completely bashed.

Harry will never leave her, he’s too weak and wimpy and wouldn’t know what to do. She may leave him but if she did I assume he would just hang around CA to have joint custody of the kids.

Yeah this is the right answer. If she moves on, she can portray him as a racist, insensitive drug user who didn’t support her even when she was suicidal. But the kids aren’t leaving CA. He has nowhere to go. Even if she finds a wealthier third husband, he’s got nowhere to go. He’ll just hang around.

I doubt he'll hang around. Like anything with H&M, it's ultimately all about the money. If Harry stays he will be facing some significant tax challenges:

"... top LA tax lawyer David Holtz warned that Prince Harry could face a huge tax bill ...“You can safely assume that someone at the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is looking very closely at him. This is a big deal.” said Holtz.

US tax laws indicate that any foreign national who stays in the US for 183 consecutive days within a three-year period must pay US taxes on worldwide earnings.

According to another tax expert, Prince Harry’s tax bill could be enormous and would likely open up a ‘can of worms’ for the Royal Family as the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will want to know about all of his income sources.

The expert said: “That’s not just his Netflix deal, but any monies he might have received in gifts from Prince Charles and any trust funds, savings accounts or other assets he has in the UK. That means the Royal books will be open to scrutiny. The US taxman is far more zealous than his UK counterpart.”

Why does this “expert” assume the Sussexes don’t have competent tax advisors?

These are unusual tax issues. And the Sussexes don't have competent non-tax advisors, so I'm not sure why anyone would assume that this is different.

Isn't that the truth! Based on their behaviors thus far they aren't winning any popularity contests here or abroad. Especially after his disrespect for the First Amendment. No spin doctor alive can whirl that cr@p back into his mouth.

[Anonymous]

I’m pretty certain these are surrogate babies. The circumstances around their birth were fishy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m pretty certain these are surrogate babies. The circumstances around their birth were fishy.

If they are surrogate babies even if from IVF things can get really interesting. Watch if the spin machine fire up its racism claims again, if they do then probably no surrogates involved. If they don't - then maybe it's détente. Harry has dirt on the Crown for sure but the Queen isn't above using dirt on the Sussexes to shut them up.

[Anonymous]

why does anyone think the babies were born via surrogates and IVF? I had babies at same age. Not everyone needs to go IVF route. She also had pregnancy face on Oprah interview. You may not like her but spreading things is crazy.