Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a big space between love and hate. The people in the Refinery article are extreme. There are some posters here who are extreme one way or the other two. What I don’t get is being labeled a hater for pointing out that something is obviously not right with these two. They’re grown adults who went from saying how Meghan couldn’t wait to hit the ground running and Harry’s family would be the family she never had to whining about no one asking how they’re doing on a tour of the most impoverished continent in the world. Then they move into a $15M mansion in the middle of the world’s biggest crisis of our times and whine about how Harry’s dad cut them off. They’ve been caught in numerous lies (the marriage before the wedding, Archie being denied a title he was entitled to, getting the Queen’s permission to use Lilibet), hypocrites (lecturing on environmentalism, then flying private, keeping their titles, accusing the BRF of being mean and racist but naming their child after the head of the institution). Nonetheless, most of us don’t “hate” them. I couldn’t care less what happens to these two. But I don’t have any respect for them and struggle to see how any rational, objective person could have any admiration for these two.

I’m not interested in watching, reading or listening to any of their productions, podcasts or books. I’ve watched Harry grow up and feel sorry for him and sad at how lost he seems. I’m not a “hater” but I’m certainly not a fan. I think this is probably where most people fall on the spectrum.

Agree. There is something seriously wrong with those who have such cult-like blind faith and rabidly defend H&M. It's so odd and so pervasive here on DCUM I question whether these defenders aren't being paid in some way. There is no other celebrity/entertainer who has a "Fans Only" thread. Why?

I just saw this quote by Harry: “I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers.”

The First Amendment. Bonkers.

The more they speak, especially with statements like this, the more they will be ridiculed. Rightfully so.

This^ Coordinated effort to do damage control.

Agree. A coordinated effort has become more and more apparent. It is especially notable when the H&M defenders have no comment over something as egregious as this.

For Harry to be living in the U.S., married to a U.S. citizen, have children who are U.S. citizens, and then boldly claim that our First Amendment is "bonkers" is appalling. Especially when he claims to be all-in for veterans. You know, those people who have sacrificed to protect this democracy and our "bonkers" rights like the First Amendment. Shame on him. I think every person who is a veteran or knows a veteran, and even those who don't, should boycott anything to do with him and be very vocal about it after this quote.

My God, you are delusional as the people in the article. Coordinated effort? On DCUM? To supposedly defend H&M? The self-importance is astonishing. Nobody, literally nobody, is reading DCUM for its pop culture relevance. Nobody actually cares what angry and jealous aging women think about H&M. The idea of some coordinated effort is laughable to anyone rational.

I read this thread periodically. Not regularly. I skip pages at a time. I would frankly rather the entire BRF be retired, but I am not a UK citizen, so if they want to keep paying top tax dollars for lazy pedophile grifters, that's their problem. But when I read, I do it because I despise the racist haters and I don't want racists on DCUM. (And you can stop your whining about fake "racism" about white woman now, I am white myself.) Literally almost every time I open this thread I find a racist post about MM that I report. Every time! And I am not the only one who reports racist posts. Jeff deletes them quickly, too. So that's your coordination right there: a bunch of normal DCUM readers who don't want racists in the DCUM community, and who watch the thread for that.

Miss me with this "we aren't like those insane haters in the Refinery" whining. You are exactly like them.

100% THANK YOU. +1 the insistence that anyone who dares not partake in the witch-hunt and cyberbullying of Meghan and Harry must be getting paid by their PR team (the actual literal f*ck?) is seriously deranged behavior.

Also deranged is pretending there’s a “witch-hunt” against H&M. Seriously. No one is punching down by criticizing them, and those of you who defend their every action aren’t heroes of social justice. Get real.

Also “cyber bullying”? You guys aren’t the brightest, are you? We don’t have any evidence that H&M even engage online, and yet you state as a matter of fact that they are being cyber bullied? (Why don’t you help real people who aren’t rich and powerful and actually do have to cope with cyber bullying?)

Basic gullible boot lickers - that’s what you seem like to me.

The fact that you are literally demonstrating what PP is talking about... the lack of self-awareness is something else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a big space between love and hate. The people in the Refinery article are extreme. There are some posters here who are extreme one way or the other two. What I don’t get is being labeled a hater for pointing out that something is obviously not right with these two. They’re grown adults who went from saying how Meghan couldn’t wait to hit the ground running and Harry’s family would be the family she never had to whining about no one asking how they’re doing on a tour of the most impoverished continent in the world. Then they move into a $15M mansion in the middle of the world’s biggest crisis of our times and whine about how Harry’s dad cut them off. They’ve been caught in numerous lies (the marriage before the wedding, Archie being denied a title he was entitled to, getting the Queen’s permission to use Lilibet), hypocrites (lecturing on environmentalism, then flying private, keeping their titles, accusing the BRF of being mean and racist but naming their child after the head of the institution). Nonetheless, most of us don’t “hate” them. I couldn’t care less what happens to these two. But I don’t have any respect for them and struggle to see how any rational, objective person could have any admiration for these two.

I’m not interested in watching, reading or listening to any of their productions, podcasts or books. I’ve watched Harry grow up and feel sorry for him and sad at how lost he seems. I’m not a “hater” but I’m certainly not a fan. I think this is probably where most people fall on the spectrum.

Agree. There is something seriously wrong with those who have such cult-like blind faith and rabidly defend H&M. It's so odd and so pervasive here on DCUM I question whether these defenders aren't being paid in some way. There is no other celebrity/entertainer who has a "Fans Only" thread. Why?

I just saw this quote by Harry: “I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers.”

The First Amendment. Bonkers.

The more they speak, especially with statements like this, the more they will be ridiculed. Rightfully so.

This^ Coordinated effort to do damage control.

Agree. A coordinated effort has become more and more apparent. It is especially notable when the H&M defenders have no comment over something as egregious as this.

For Harry to be living in the U.S., married to a U.S. citizen, have children who are U.S. citizens, and then boldly claim that our First Amendment is "bonkers" is appalling. Especially when he claims to be all-in for veterans. You know, those people who have sacrificed to protect this democracy and our "bonkers" rights like the First Amendment. Shame on him. I think every person who is a veteran or knows a veteran, and even those who don't, should boycott anything to do with him and be very vocal about it after this quote.

My God, you are delusional as the people in the article. Coordinated effort? On DCUM? To supposedly defend H&M? The self-importance is astonishing. Nobody, literally nobody, is reading DCUM for its pop culture relevance. Nobody actually cares what angry and jealous aging women think about H&M. The idea of some coordinated effort is laughable to anyone rational.

I read this thread periodically. Not regularly. I skip pages at a time. I would frankly rather the entire BRF be retired, but I am not a UK citizen, so if they want to keep paying top tax dollars for lazy pedophile grifters, that's their problem. But when I read, I do it because I despise the racist haters and I don't want racists on DCUM. (And you can stop your whining about fake "racism" about white woman now, I am white myself.) Literally almost every time I open this thread I find a racist post about MM that I report. Every time! And I am not the only one who reports racist posts. Jeff deletes them quickly, too. So that's your coordination right there: a bunch of normal DCUM readers who don't want racists in the DCUM community, and who watch the thread for that.

Miss me with this "we aren't like those insane haters in the Refinery" whining. You are exactly like them.

100% THANK YOU. +1 the insistence that anyone who dares not partake in the witch-hunt and cyberbullying of Meghan and Harry must be getting paid by their PR team (the actual literal f*ck?) is seriously deranged behavior.

Also deranged is pretending there’s a “witch-hunt” against H&M. Seriously. No one is punching down by criticizing them, and those of you who defend their every action aren’t heroes of social justice. Get real.

Also “cyber bullying”? You guys aren’t the brightest, are you? We don’t have any evidence that H&M even engage online, and yet you state as a matter of fact that they are being cyber bullied? (Why don’t you help real people who aren’t rich and powerful and actually do have to cope with cyber bullying?)

Basic gullible boot lickers - that’s what you seem like to me.

The fact that you are literally demonstrating what PP is talking about... the lack of self-awareness is something else.

I’m sorry for being rude but exactly how dim are you? It’s not possible to cyber bully someone who isn’t engaging on the internet.

[Anonymous]

Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

That's not exactly what he said. If you paid any attention at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

That's not exactly what he said. If you paid any attention at all.

DP. I paid attention and yes he did say that. He is hosted by a country that has expended blood and tears for the first amendment. And yet he just casually tosses it aside as if it is unimportant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

Wasn’t this discussed several weeks ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

Wasn’t this discussed several weeks ago?

Are you new here? We rehash everything.

[Anonymous]

Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry has now been quoted as saying the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is "bonkers."

This should never be overlooked by any American - ever - and you can bet corporate America has taken notice.

You really sound crazy. Do you think anyone cares that he said this…oh well I guess you do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Another white woman here who reads this thread periodically and reports racist posts because I think you guys are a bunch of mean hateful jerks and not because I have and deep love for H&M.

Not sure what the spin up is over the first amendment

1) he’s not and never will run for office over here
2) he’s not American. The first amendment is pretty unique and most other countries think it’s extreme
3) I believe it’s important and foundational to American principals but also see that it’s drawbacks (the inability to prevent the deluge of misinformation and lies to the populace) have been on full display the last few years
4) you can love things (America, free speech) and also not believe they are above criticism and improvement
5) he specifically has spent much of his life being lied about by the press and using the tools available to him to fight back
6) he didn’t even qualify if bonkers was good or bad. When I read it I got more of a “that’s a really extreme rule you guys have going!” Rather than a harsh criticism. He even said he hadn’t been here long and needed to learn more about it.

FACTS! Dude is not American, why would he have any type of respect for the First Amendment? Somebody trying to make a big deal over nothing…

Because he lives here. If the police in our country didn’t protect him, he’s be sol.

He’s a visitor, despite his money and power. He could at least be gracious about it.

Someone who believes in the first amendment should also believe in someone using it to say something controversial. You sound like you don’t understand it much yourself.

What do the police have to do with anything?

You sound like one of those morons who are all about the first amendment until someone says something they think is annoying. I’ll remind you of Patrick Henry, evoking Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say but I’d die for your right to say it.”

Dear god I worry about some of you.

The first amendment doesn’t say much about freedom of speech for people who aren’t Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s a big space between love and hate. The people in the Refinery article are extreme. There are some posters here who are extreme one way or the other two. What I don’t get is being labeled a hater for pointing out that something is obviously not right with these two. They’re grown adults who went from saying how Meghan couldn’t wait to hit the ground running and Harry’s family would be the family she never had to whining about no one asking how they’re doing on a tour of the most impoverished continent in the world. Then they move into a $15M mansion in the middle of the world’s biggest crisis of our times and whine about how Harry’s dad cut them off. They’ve been caught in numerous lies (the marriage before the wedding, Archie being denied a title he was entitled to, getting the Queen’s permission to use Lilibet), hypocrites (lecturing on environmentalism, then flying private, keeping their titles, accusing the BRF of being mean and racist but naming their child after the head of the institution). Nonetheless, most of us don’t “hate” them. I couldn’t care less what happens to these two. But I don’t have any respect for them and struggle to see how any rational, objective person could have any admiration for these two.

I’m not interested in watching, reading or listening to any of their productions, podcasts or books. I’ve watched Harry grow up and feel sorry for him and sad at how lost he seems. I’m not a “hater” but I’m certainly not a fan. I think this is probably where most people fall on the spectrum.

Agree. There is something seriously wrong with those who have such cult-like blind faith and rabidly defend H&M. It's so odd and so pervasive here on DCUM I question whether these defenders aren't being paid in some way. There is no other celebrity/entertainer who has a "Fans Only" thread. Why?

I just saw this quote by Harry: “I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers.”

The First Amendment. Bonkers.

The more they speak, especially with statements like this, the more they will be ridiculed. Rightfully so.

This^ Coordinated effort to do damage control.

Agree. A coordinated effort has become more and more apparent. It is especially notable when the H&M defenders have no comment over something as egregious as this.

For Harry to be living in the U.S., married to a U.S. citizen, have children who are U.S. citizens, and then boldly claim that our First Amendment is "bonkers" is appalling. Especially when he claims to be all-in for veterans. You know, those people who have sacrificed to protect this democracy and our "bonkers" rights like the First Amendment. Shame on him. I think every person who is a veteran or knows a veteran, and even those who don't, should boycott anything to do with him and be very vocal about it after this quote.

My God, you are delusional as the people in the article. Coordinated effort? On DCUM? To supposedly defend H&M? The self-importance is astonishing. Nobody, literally nobody, is reading DCUM for its pop culture relevance. Nobody actually cares what angry and jealous aging women think about H&M. The idea of some coordinated effort is laughable to anyone rational.

I read this thread periodically. Not regularly. I skip pages at a time. I would frankly rather the entire BRF be retired, but I am not a UK citizen, so if they want to keep paying top tax dollars for lazy pedophile grifters, that's their problem. But when I read, I do it because I despise the racist haters and I don't want racists on DCUM. (And you can stop your whining about fake "racism" about white woman now, I am white myself.) Literally almost every time I open this thread I find a racist post about MM that I report. Every time! And I am not the only one who reports racist posts. Jeff deletes them quickly, too. So that's your coordination right there: a bunch of normal DCUM readers who don't want racists in the DCUM community, and who watch the thread for that.

Miss me with this "we aren't like those insane haters in the Refinery" whining. You are exactly like them.

Give me a foot stomp and an harumph!!

[Anonymous]

It’s a little odd that H&M didn’t take a name from Meghan’s nr