Barr and Durham

[Anonymous]

It seems like Brennan is still walking around a free life man. Wasn’t he supposed to be indicted by now?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Good points and questions here:


The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The name of this subsource, and the realization of the FBI's prior suspicions, should have ended the entire probe. Instead the FBI doubled down, hid things from the court, kept going. This again raises urgent need to know who knew what, and when.

And people wonder why #Durham is looking into all this?
Also, extra-credit question: Wasn't it Mueller's job to find sources of Russian disinformation? How do you miss the guy potentially feeding it directly to the FBI?

https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1309272844661002241

[Anonymous]

Ms. Strassel is making a lot of assumptions that are not in evidence. It’s actually striking how little information is given in this letter, so much so that it’s almost as if Barr is trying to float this out there in the hopes that other people will read more into it than their is and draw conclusions that would not be supported if Barr released the full context for this factoid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good points and questions here:


The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The name of this subsource, and the realization of the FBI's prior suspicions, should have ended the entire probe. Instead the FBI doubled down, hid things from the court, kept going. This again raises urgent need to know who knew what, and when.

And people wonder why #Durham is looking into all this?
Also, extra-credit question: Wasn't it Mueller's job to find sources of Russian disinformation? How do you miss the guy potentially feeding it directly to the FBI?

https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1309272844661002241

And the same FBI investigated Hillary Clinton. No wonder people want a new investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this is a great idea. Go on and reinvestigate Clinton! Got for it!
Of course it’s all fair when democrats retake the senate, to impeach Barr, and dive back into the Mueller probe.
Let’s haul Ivanka in to answer some questions. Let’s finally look at Trump’s books and see what his involvement with Russia entails!
Great idea!

[Anonymous]

You all are debunking this, but Putin just put out a release suggested Russia would stop interfering in US politics.

It's like all the dots are there, Trump has told you it happened, the GOP Senate told you it happened and now Putin is telling you it happened, and yet, you don't want to believe ANY of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all are debunking this, but Putin just put out a release suggested Russia would stop interfering in US politics.

It's like all the dots are there, Trump has told you it happened, the GOP Senate told you it happened and now Putin is telling you it happened, and yet, you don't want to believe ANY of it.

LOL.
The fact that you believe anything Putin says is laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all are debunking this, but Putin just put out a release suggested Russia would stop interfering in US politics.

It's like all the dots are there, Trump has told you it happened, the GOP Senate told you it happened and now Putin is telling you it happened, and yet, you don't want to believe ANY of it.

LOL.
The fact that you believe anything Putin says is laughable.

Trump does.

[Anonymous]

This is a huge story, and, from what I hear - only the tip of the iceberg.

To investigate if Trump colluded with Russia, the FBI relied on information, paid for by the Clinton campaign, based on a source suspected by the FBI of being a Russian agent. The FBI then hid from the FISA court who paid for the info and the fact the source might be a foreign agent.

And, I found this thread interesting:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Good points and questions here:


The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The same FBI said to be concerned about Russian interference in election, was using information from a suspected Russian spy to probe a presidential campaign. The same FBI claiming Carter Page a Russian agent, was making that case based on info from a suspected Russia agent.

The name of this subsource, and the realization of the FBI's prior suspicions, should have ended the entire probe. Instead the FBI doubled down, hid things from the court, kept going. This again raises urgent need to know who knew what, and when.

And people wonder why #Durham is looking into all this?
Also, extra-credit question: Wasn't it Mueller's job to find sources of Russian disinformation? How do you miss the guy potentially feeding it directly to the FBI?

https://twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1309272844661002241

And the same FBI investigated Hillary Clinton. No wonder people want a new investigation.

It gets better: The spy was Igor Vinchenko (sp?) worked with (wait for it) Vindman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge story, and, from what I hear - only the tip of the iceberg.

To investigate if Trump colluded with Russia, the FBI relied on information, paid for by the Clinton campaign, based on a source suspected by the FBI of being a Russian agent. The FBI then hid from the FISA court who paid for the info and the fact the source might be a foreign agent.

And, I found this thread interesting:

The investigation started because Papadopolus spouted off about Russia and Hillary's emails. I mean, Roger Stone was convicted because he coordinated the released of emails from the Wiklileaks (ie GRU) hack of the DNC servers. Like, those are stipulated in his case. And yet, here you are promoting the tweet of some guy who no one has heard of and isn't even a blue check.

Conspiracy theory much?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge story, and, from what I hear - only the tip of the iceberg.

To investigate if Trump colluded with Russia, the FBI relied on information, paid for by the Clinton campaign, based on a source suspected by the FBI of being a Russian agent. The FBI then hid from the FISA court who paid for the info and the fact the source might be a foreign agent.

And, I found this thread interesting:

I’m not sure what you find interesting about it since he doesn’t make a single substantiated factual claim, it’s wholly conclusory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge story, and, from what I hear - only the tip of the iceberg.

To investigate if Trump colluded with Russia, the FBI relied on information, paid for by the Clinton campaign, based on a source suspected by the FBI of being a Russian agent. The FBI then hid from the FISA court who paid for the info and the fact the source might be a foreign agent.

And, I found this thread interesting:

The investigation started because Papadopolus spouted off about Russia and Hillary's emails. I mean, Roger Stone was convicted because he coordinated the released of emails from the Wiklileaks (ie GRU) hack of the DNC servers. Like, those are stipulated in his case. And yet, here you are promoting the tweet of some guy who no one has heard of and isn't even a blue check.

Conspiracy theory much?

Yeah, but the guy says he's never been a fan of Trump and didn't vote for him, so that should give him instant, unquestionable credibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a huge story, and, from what I hear - only the tip of the iceberg.

To investigate if Trump colluded with Russia, the FBI relied on information, paid for by the Clinton campaign, based on a source suspected by the FBI of being a Russian agent. The FBI then hid from the FISA court who paid for the info and the fact the source might be a foreign agent.

And, I found this thread interesting:

I’m not sure what you find interesting about it since he doesn’t make a single substantiated factual claim, it’s wholly conclusory.

It's interesting because as more and more of this travesty is revealed, there will be more and more people making the same admissions.