Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Even slurs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Even slurs?

Yup. Even slurs. None of this “we’re reclaiming the word so we can say it but you can’t” bs.
To be clear, I don’t use slurs and I teach my kids not to either. But let’s be real - they’re just words. No worse that “fat” or “ugly” or “stupid.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

And no one cares what you think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

And no one cares what you think.

I was responding to PP. I am a free speech defender and I am not complaining to the government about speech I don’t like. You must have missed that part.

[Anonymous]

Should Jewish students not have a safe campus environment and not be able to walk across campus without threats?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

And no one cares what you think.

I was responding to PP. I am a free speech defender and I am not complaining to the government about speech I don’t like. You must have missed that part.

This is about how Stefanik and the rest of the GOP are a bunch of hypocrites. It's not about you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Should Jewish students not have a safe campus environment and not be able to walk across campus without threats?

The "polite" Jew haters here will respond with gaslighting claims that the threats aren't real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Even slurs?

Yup. Even slurs. None of this “we’re reclaiming the word so we can say it but you can’t” bs.
To be clear, I don’t use slurs and I teach my kids not to either. But let’s be real - they’re just words. No worse that “fat” or “ugly” or “stupid.”

Are you a minority by any chance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

And no one cares what you think.

I was responding to PP. I am a free speech defender and I am not complaining to the government about speech I don’t like. You must have missed that part.

This is about how Stefanik and the rest of the GOP are a bunch of hypocrites. It's not about you.

My point is it’s not all of the rest of the GOP. Some on this thread even.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Should Jewish students not have a safe campus environment and not be able to walk across campus without threats?

The "polite" Jew haters here will respond with gaslighting claims that the threats aren't real.

On the flip side, some will view any utterance as a threat to stifle any kind of dissenting voices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

Are you under the impression that the speech-suppression tools and departments built by these schools should only be used for speech you like?

If you build up an apparatus of censorship and speech suppression, of course people of all political persuasions will use it. The right is using the tools that the left put into position and built up for many years. Why should they not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To absolutely no one's surprise, the right wing "free speech" defenders are perfectly willing to sick the government on speech they don't like.

I’m a free speech advocate and I think other than direct threat (“I’m going to kill you”), any speech should be allowed.
People should be able to speak out about Lia Thomas without fear of repercussion. Anti-Israel protests should be allowed. Anything that doesn’t cause direct harm (and I don’t mean hurt feelings) should be allowed. It’s all or nothing for me.

Elise Stefanik and the rest of the GOP loudmouths disagree.

Ok and?

And no one cares what you think.

I was responding to PP. I am a free speech defender and I am not complaining to the government about speech I don’t like. You must have missed that part.

This is about how Stefanik and the rest of the GOP are a bunch of hypocrites. It's not about you.

My point is it’s not all of the rest of the GOP. Some on this thread even.

Are there GOP elected officials defending the free speech rights of these students and calling out the likes of Stefanik? I have not seen any. Do you have an example?