Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Cant believe a larger news outlet still hasn’t touched this. How do we get this more widely known so (presumed)victims can get help and resources?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I saw she is being held in the central detention facility in DC. I wonder if she is in the regular section or wherever the January 6 detainees are being held...

I believe she is in a federal facility not DC Jail. She was arrested for federal crimes by the FBI not by MPD for a crime committed in DC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think she was able to hide the behavior in general but if it’s true the kids are the with the dad and he has primary custody he must have had some reason even if they were suspicions or things he saw or the girls said that made him think twice even if he was not able to admit the truth.

She may have been doing various deviant things all a long but if the incidents always appeared to be one offs and they were explained away then no one was putting together a pattern.

If the behavior started suddenly or it escalated quickly, it’s possible that she suffered a traumatic brain injury from an injury that from the outside looked innocuous. TBI can alter people’s behavior or escalate already occurring behaviors. Not an excuse but an explanation. It doesn’t relieve her of any responsibility and she is still fully to blame for her actions.

It’s hard to get an adult medical care against their wishes. The family only so much power. Her crime is so horrific that even if her parents suspected I think they quickly shut it down bc they couldn’t handle even the thought of their own child being such a monster. Think about - as parents the idea is so terrible that most people would shut down at the suggestion.

There needs to be far more coverage locally so that possible victims can be identified and so they can receive help. Her rich family can start proving compensation to her victims.

I have no connection of any of these people, and am sickened and horrified by the story, but did note in some of the photos floating around of her, she appears to have some scars on her forehead that could be indicative of a previous TBI.

They're called wrinkles.

Nah, the PR posters can drop that idea, along with her parents as heroes. No TBI. And her family appealed her 2019 CONVICTION and got it dismissed. They suck too. (pun intended for readers of the whole thread)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I saw she is being held in the central detention facility in DC. I wonder if she is in the regular section or wherever the January 6 detainees are being held...

I believe she is in a federal facility not DC Jail. She was arrested for federal crimes by the FBI not by MPD for a crime committed in DC.

Was the crime in DC that she emailed to pictures to the agent in DC? I thought she traveled to Northern Virginia where she was caught. I was confused why she wasn't being held in a federal facility in Va.

[Anonymous]

Is there a mugshot for the 2023 or 2019 arrests?

[Anonymous]

The enticement charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years up to life in prison and it's a slam dunk conviction because the elements of the crime are based purely on the state of mind of the perpetrator and there is no victim for the defense to discredit. Hoppe's goose is cooked and she will spend at least the next ten years in prison. The other charges can be used as leverage for a plea bargain.

Hoppe's state of mind is much worse, than other enticement convictions, because she wasn't someone who was just physically attracted to minors to engage in intercourse. The judge may view Hoppe as someone who is irredeemable and hand out a longer sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did the family help her get an under the radar job?

https://twitter.com/purplmtns1743/status/1644403123589455893

No doubt the law firm hired Hoppe knowing full well of the details of her sex in the park arrest. These attorneys should face sanctions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looking at her picture, despite knowing what the charges are in this case, makes alarm bells in my head go off. There is something inherantly 'off' about her based on the photo posted. I can't put my finger on it, she just looks like she has 'issues'. This makes me so sad for children in today's world. I'm sure this isn't her first rodeo with this type of heinous crime. I hope other victims come forward. Monsters don't live in the dark anymore, they are know community members. Sad and sickening!

Eh, she looks like a middle-aged mom who was maybe once a sorority girl. She’s a monster, but nothing about having a sharp-nose, highlights, whatever you see there rings bells for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the family help her get an under the radar job?

https://twitter.com/purplmtns1743/status/1644403123589455893

No doubt the law firm hired Hoppe knowing full well of the details of her sex in the park arrest. These attorneys should face sanctions.

I don't see a problem with hiring someone who did this. It's the rest of the stuff that's a huge issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at her picture, despite knowing what the charges are in this case, makes alarm bells in my head go off. There is something inherantly 'off' about her based on the photo posted. I can't put my finger on it, she just looks like she has 'issues'. This makes me so sad for children in today's world. I'm sure this isn't her first rodeo with this type of heinous crime. I hope other victims come forward. Monsters don't live in the dark anymore, they are know community members. Sad and sickening!

Eh, she looks like a middle-aged mom who was maybe once a sorority girl. She’s a monster, but nothing about having a sharp-nose, highlights, whatever you see there rings bells for me.

Agree. PP is just engaging in typical, "I would have known there was something wrong by looking at her" nonsense. These terrible abusers get away with it precisely because they blend in and seem very ordinary.

[Anonymous]

The 2019 conviction was overturned on appeal.

What would there be to "sanction" for giving someone w/no conviction a job?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the family help her get an under the radar job?

https://twitter.com/purplmtns1743/status/1644403123589455893

No doubt the law firm hired Hoppe knowing full well of the details of her sex in the park arrest. These attorneys should face sanctions.

I don't see a problem with hiring someone who did this. It's the rest of the stuff that's a huge issue.

Agree. She’s a monster but i would never equate consensual adult sex in a park with someone likely to sexually abuse children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The 2019 conviction was overturned on appeal.

What would there be to "sanction" for giving someone w/no conviction a job?

Arrests can be considered. There is a separate legal process to have arrests expunged from the record. Plenty of people have been denied employment because of an arrest. It's a common practice. Especially for an occupation with a fiduciary responsibility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what’s the deal with St. Catherine's?

Just that it didn't surprise me she went to St. C's, lots of deviant sexual
behavior, drugs in 80s, 90s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what’s the deal with St. Catherine's?

Just that it didn't surprise me she went to St. C's, lots of deviant sexual
behavior, drugs in 80s, 90s.

Huh? I went there then. You sure you got the right school?