I'm a rationale conservative - can you convince me voting rights legislation is needed?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

DP. Do you not understand that every illegal vote negates my vote?

And, yes, mail-in votes are the easiest way to have voter fraud. And, yes, there is evidence of voter fraud--but it is hard to prove. There are convictions of it on record and you are incredibly naive if you think there are not.

There is far more evidence of fraud than there is of voters being turned away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

DP. Do you not understand that every illegal vote negates my vote?

And, yes, mail-in votes are the easiest way to have voter fraud. And, yes, there is evidence of voter fraud--but it is hard to prove. There are convictions of it on record and you are incredibly naive if you think there are not.

There is far more evidence of fraud than there is of voters being turned away.

Gonna need a citation for that, chief.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

DP. Do you not understand that every illegal vote negates my vote?

And, yes, mail-in votes are the easiest way to have voter fraud. And, yes, there is evidence of voter fraud--but it is hard to prove. There are convictions of it on record and you are incredibly naive if you think there are not.
Also this.

There is far more evidence of fraud than there is of voters being turned away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

DP. Do you not understand that every illegal vote negates my vote?

And, yes, mail-in votes are the easiest way to have voter fraud. And, yes, there is evidence of voter fraud--but it is hard to prove. There are convictions of it on record and you are incredibly naive if you think there are not.

There is far more evidence of fraud than there is of voters being turned away.

This thread deals in facts, dude. You don’t have any. Your god-king appointed a special commission to look for voter fraud and it didn’t find any.
“The now-disbanded voting integrity commission launched by the Trump administration uncovered no evidence to support claims of widespread voter fraud, according to an analysis of administration documents released Friday.

In a letter to Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who are both Republicans and led the commission, Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap said the documents show there was a “pre-ordained outcome” and that drafts of a commission report included a section on evidence of voter fraud that was “glaringly empty.”
https://apnews.com/article/north-america-donald-trump-us-news-ap-top-news-elections-f5f6a73b2af546ee97816bb35e82c18d

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if you really are “rational”, then you either already know why voting rights legislation is needed, or you’re being willfully oblivious. In either case, I doubt that there’s much that an anonymous internet stranger can do to sway you. Instead, I’ll pose a question to you.

If you’re truly “conservative “ and support the US Constitution, what arguments do you have for NOT using every resource we have, including legislation, to guarantee that every citizen’s rights are equally protected?

If you believe that this is the case already, then I’m gonna go with “willfully oblivious “ and guess that you’re probably enjoying all the energy and time that dozens of well-meaning people are fruitlessly expending here.

DP. Do you not understand that every illegal vote negates my vote?

And, yes, mail-in votes are the easiest way to have voter fraud. And, yes, there is evidence of voter fraud--but it is hard to prove. There are convictions of it on record and you are incredibly naive if you think there are not.

There is far more evidence of fraud than there is of voters being turned away.

This tells me you have NO idea how mail-in voiting works and how many safeguards are in place to ensure its integrity. As such, the rest of your post holds zero merit.

[Anonymous]

So in the GOP's eyes, the results of an election don't matter as long as the party can dictate who is declared the winner.

[Anonymous]

So in the GOP's eyes, the results of an election don't matter as long as the party can dictate who is declared the winner.

Yup. And the constituents of a Florida Congressman in a strong Democratic seat who died in office needed to sue the governor to even get a special election scheduled at all. That district went almost a year without representation in Congress.
https://www.wptv.com/news/political/lawsuit-filed-against-gov-ron-desantis-concerning-seat-long-held-by-u-s-rep-alcee-hastings?_amp=true

[Anonymous]

OP, this is totally fine, right?

[Anonymous]

This tells me you have NO idea how mail-in voiting works and how many safeguards are in place to ensure its integrity. As such, the rest of your post holds zero merit.

tells me you don't know Philly...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This tells me you have NO idea how mail-in voiting works and how many safeguards are in place to ensure its integrity. As such, the rest of your post holds zero merit.

tells me you don't know Philly...

Again, this thread deals in facts. Post some.

[Anonymous]

Or this, OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP, this is totally fine, right?

It appears that this is an unusual situation.....

He won just over 40% of the vote in the primary. Since there was no other candidates for other parties, there is no special general election - originally scheduled for March 8.

Seems as if your little twitter friend above is trying to create a scandal where none exists. It is a matter of rules and procedures.

Democratic Rep.-elect Daryl Campbell won a four-way Primary Election on Jan. 11 to succeed outgoing Rep. Bobby DuBose in Broward County’s House District 94. Since no other parties fielded qualifying candidates in the district that covers parts of Fort Lauderdale, Plantation and Wilton Manors, Campbell is the de facto winner of the General Election, which was scheduled for March 8.

Campbell said that conversations with Republican Speaker Chris Sprowls’ office and his Democratic colleagues have led him to believe he will be sworn in this week — although he hasn’t received the schedule for it yet.

Campbell won slightly more than 40 percent of the vote in a universal primary and Broward County’s Supervisor of Election Joe Scott pushed for Campbell to be seated immediately. But the Democratic leadership in the House believed initially, after the election, that the Secretary of State’s Office would not certify Campbell’s victory until after the scheduled General Election on March 8, as has happened in the past.

The Secretary of State’s communications office said that Campbell’s Primary win will be certified on Tuesday. But spokeswoman Mallory Morgan has not given a definitive answer to a Jan. 13 question from Florida Politics on whether the Primary Election’s result certification will be enough to mean that Campbell gets a seat in the current Session.

On Thursday, Morgan wrote: “Our office is working on your request. Thank you for your patience.”

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/489102-daryl-campbell-comes-to-tallahassee-this-week-but-his-start-day-remains-uncertain/

[Anonymous]

Is the OP responding on this thread anymore or hiding his irrationality under the veneer of anonymity?