New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

i agree...also, it the one he posted today about a PM from a D1 coach saying basically GA players are not good...if they are truly saying it then post the coach or stop it. i can make some screen shot up too and post that ECNL players are xxxx

he should just drop the GA in his bio and just do ECNL and put whatever he wants. the fake "we do both leagues" is old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

i agree...also, it the one he posted today about a PM from a D1 coach saying basically GA players are not good...if they are truly saying it then post the coach or stop it. i can make some screen shot up too and post that ECNL players are xxxx

he should just drop the GA in his bio and just do ECNL and put whatever he wants. the fake "we do both leagues" is old.

His constant use of AI images of girls holding signs is creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please - the same holds true of MLs Next and GA- they have their patsy’s all over social media trying to position things. Stating opinions as facts and hearing toward GA (and MLs Next) as the next coming of Christ.

MLSNext and GA are about the players! ECNL is only about money!

GA is a business as well, don't delude yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

wrong the number of college programs attending their events is going down, drastically. geez you can literally go to the GA showcase site and count them. GA won't post that. they post number of "scouts" meaning some college teams bring their water boys, nutritionist, trainers, grad assistants and statisticians and since they are part of 1 college program, they all get counted as "scouts". lmao at the GA hats

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

wrong the number of college programs attending their events is going down, drastically. geez you can literally go to the GA showcase site and count them. GA won't post that. they post number of "scouts" meaning some college teams bring their water boys, nutritionist, trainers, grad assistants and statisticians and since they are part of 1 college program, they all get counted as "scouts". lmao at the GA hats

Again GA contracted out counting the number of recruiters to a 3rd party. This is the source of truth.

Also colleges dont fly "water boys, nutritionist, trainers, grad assistants" to events unless theyre somehow involved in the recruitment process. It doesnt make sense to spend money this way. You just dont like the numbers and are trying to twist them in your head.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

wrong the number of college programs attending their events is going down, drastically. geez you can literally go to the GA showcase site and count them. GA won't post that. they post number of "scouts" meaning some college teams bring their water boys, nutritionist, trainers, grad assistants and statisticians and since they are part of 1 college program, they all get counted as "scouts". lmao at the GA hats

It was posted earlier but all but 3 of P4 conference members were at GA playoffs. That is good enough for me. My kid not getting into Stanford regardless………😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

Uhm, it's not like GA doesn't have a vested interest in bloating its own numbers so not sure that is a really useful comparison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most hypocritical thing I have seen from Imyouthsoccer guy is "polling" where to put the recruiting numbers for those ECNL teams that moved to GA, in ECNL or GA. The response was ECNL because that is where they were developed.

Until someone asked where they put the Nationals numbers and he said ECNL but that was different.

He is clearly a shill of the highest order. At one point I thought I knew who it was (hint: Chicago based ECNL parent) but dont have enough evidence to truly support that.

I noticed this as well.

He puts up stats about youth clubs with players playing D1 soccer. But, while the club might be in XYZ league now back when the college player was on one of their teams it was in ABC league.

It's deliberately done to favor ECNL. Unfortunately the youngers parents that haven't been around for a while arent able to see through the BS.

Count how many times they mention "GA coaches attendance decline is VERY worrisome".

Actually a talented shill. Sprinkles just enough GA commits to pretend to be unbiased.

If it who I think it is, their kid should be aging out soon so maybe it goes away.

But GAs official numbers show that the number of recruiters at events is going up.

Who do you believe a random person on X or the league itself who has a 3rd party tabulating everything up for them?

Uhm, it's not like GA doesn't have a vested interest in bloating its own numbers so not sure that is a really useful comparison.

What dont you understand about GA outsourcing defining scout attendance to a 3rd party?

If you have issues complain to them.

[Anonymous]

What does ECNL have to say about scouts at their events?

[Anonymous]

Does anyone know what the actual arrangement is between GA and MLSN? I guess I just wonder why MLSN would be interested in helping GA by leveraging their platform to help GA?

Pressure from US Soccer? Is there a financial incentive?

If a top boys ECNL program wanted to come over and not bring the girls would MLSN really turn them down?

I guess just asking for clarity if anyone has it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the actual arrangement is between GA and MLSN? I guess I just wonder why MLSN would be interested in helping GA by leveraging their platform to help GA?

Pressure from US Soccer? Is there a financial incentive?

If a top boys ECNL program wanted to come over and not bring the girls would MLSN really turn them down?

I guess just asking for clarity if anyone has it.

Because MLSN and ga put the players first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the actual arrangement is between GA and MLSN? I guess I just wonder why MLSN would be interested in helping GA by leveraging their platform to help GA?

Pressure from US Soccer? Is there a financial incentive?

If a top boys ECNL program wanted to come over and not bring the girls would MLSN really turn them down?

I guess just asking for clarity if anyone has it.

ECNL has told clubs (and actually followed through on the threat) that if they change their boys ECNL teams to MLSN that they will take girls ECNL away.

To address MLSN + GA have partnered up to do the same thing to ECNL. This is why many people are saying that the legacy MLSN + girls ECNL clubs will be changing to GA soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know what the actual arrangement is between GA and MLSN? I guess I just wonder why MLSN would be interested in helping GA by leveraging their platform to help GA?

Pressure from US Soccer? Is there a financial incentive?

If a top boys ECNL program wanted to come over and not bring the girls would MLSN really turn them down?

I guess just asking for clarity if anyone has it.

ECNL has told clubs (and actually followed through on the threat) that if they change their boys ECNL teams to MLSN that they will take girls ECNL away.

To address MLSN + GA have partnered up to do the same thing to ECNL. This is why many people are saying that the legacy MLSN + girls ECNL clubs will be changing to GA soon.

ECNL controls both boys and girls side. MLSN and GA are totally and completely separate so I am still trying to figure out why MLSN is helping GA leverage the moves? The enemy of my enemy is my friend type of thing?