Why are younger men so right wing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You might add to this:

17. Trump is funny (he is one of the great American comics in fact), and

18. Trump acts like a winner. Americans like this, and his response to the failed assassination attempt drove this point home.

Do you really think he’s funny? This is a serious question. Like his “Merry Christmas to all the losers” thing is mildly amusing but it’s his only bit as far as I can see.

That was hilarious. I was very dismissive of Trump his first term, but then, on advise of my friend, began listening to him. He is seriously funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?

Why are you grossly overhyping the concern? Is denying base rate a bug or a feature for you? Your argument seems to depend on it. That's not minimization of concern, it's pointing out argumentation fallacy.

A young woman has a statistically MUCH higher chance of dying from a reaction to a bee sting than of being sexually assaulted by a trans woman or losing a scholarship to a trans woman. Of being killed by a lightning strike. Of being killed by a fridge or piece of furniture falling on them. Being shot in a mass shooting. Being hit by a car. And so on.

Anonymous wrote:
I'm not the person that is posting about it. I was watching the interaction and was curious why you were so dismissive. I think you should just acknowledge that you believe it is an acceptable risk for women to have to manage in previously female spaces. That is at least an honest conversation, vs pretending that this roll out has been without any problems.

It's odd they quote how rare it is because there are so few trans, but then they throw a fit if we don't accommodate the 1 in 10000.

Math isn't their sport.

At least this is a more honest take. Seems like you’re acknowledging that trans people aren’t a threat but you just don’t want to accommodate them. A lot of people feel this way about people who practice different religions, people with disabilities, anyone who is not exactly like them. Is that you?

I don't read it that way. I think she acknowledged they are a threat and they are rare.

Here's the superintendent of Loudon County Public Schools acknowledging that their policy of allowing so-called trans people into girls locker rooms led to two rapes. After the first girl was raped, they transferred the trans student to another school, where he raped another girl. When one of the fathers brought this up at a school board meeting, they had him arrested. This mea culpa came after months of them calling everyone homophobes. They didn't have any concern for the raped teen girls whatsoever. But they did the right thing and acknowledged that they didnt provide a safe environment.

https://youtu.be/FPgLu5iYsQo?si=rIe2N3bhbyGLyhlE

A certain percentage of people claiming to be trans are actually AGPs. Any honest discussion will admit this. You're okay with having AGPs get into the locker rooms along with the trans, and for women to be raped by them. I mean, just admit it. Then we can go about installing better security in women's spaces, demanding the presence of guards, etc.

We can’t take people that vote for and support pedophiles seriously when talking about children’s concerns. MAGA is the LAST source anyone should be looking to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?

Because there really are not cases where your fears have been realized. As others have noted, women are more likely to be threatened by a reverend or preacher or rich businessman than a trans person. They are more likely to be in a car accident or a mass shooting than be threatened by a trans person. Trans people have their own issues to be castigated and discriminated against as the right has done to be divisive. What happened to "live and let live" and "don't tread on me" and "get the government off our backs?"

I suggest you read up, because there have been widely publicized cases of problems, including the rape of a female student by a so-called trans kid in the locker room of a DC suburb high school.

Yes, there have been problems. I am not trying ti minimize it, but that one case is cited every.single.time....there are not thousands of cases or hundreds of thousands like there are with rich white men raping young boys and girls. Yet you all want to excuse and miminize trump and epstein and cite this one suburban DC case over and over and over as if it was an epidemic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.

I didn’t call anyone a name. I said that they’ve made a fool of her. It’s ok, it happens every day in some days. I’ve been scammed, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

So you are proposing to make all bathrooms unisex like airplanes? Works for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.

They keep saying no one has been harmed and will not engage with the posts about the rape of 2 Loudoun teens. I believe this is called erasure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Statistically a young woman is vastly more likely to be shot to death in their k12 classroom or on their college campus than to be sexually assaulted by a transwoman. But we are told "too bad, there's nothing that can be done about those shootings, maybe you just need to start lugging a Glock around in the asscrack of your leggings, young lady."

What a crazy world the GOP has put us in.

This dismissive approach towards women's rights isn't helping your case.

Why are you so dismissive toward the much bigger issues of the GOP's eroding of women's rights and control over their lives and bodies? Why are you so dismissive over the gun control crisis? Of the affordability crisis that leaves so many women trapped in bad situations? Why are we supposed to make transwomen the top issue when SO MANY OTHER, FAR BIGGER issues are dragging women down?

Hm. Just because those are your priorities, does not mean that everyone else should care for them. Clearly, majority of the people in this country voted for different priorities. Again, I don't know who you referring to as "we", but for some people that is a top issue. For some women, it is a FAR BIGGER issue than any of those outlined in your post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.

They keep saying no one has been harmed and will not engage with the posts about the rape of 2 Loudoun teens. I believe this is called erasure.

For them only black lives matters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.

Except in the grand scheme of things, her "legitimate concern" is something that impacts .000004 of 1% of the country. It is a miniscule event that has almost zero chance of ever actually impacting her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

I wonder if folks like you will ever realize what fools they’ve made of you, making a nearly non-existent problem into your complete identity, distracting you from the things that matter.

Ii might be the same people that were building bunkers for Y2K.

And here we are, turning to the name calling when woman raised her legitimate concern.

I didn’t call anyone a name. I said that they’ve made a fool of her. It’s ok, it happens every day in some days. I’ve been scammed, too.

You sure have. Imagine believing that men can become women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?

Why are you grossly overhyping the concern? Is denying base rate a bug or a feature for you? Your argument seems to depend on it. That's not minimization of concern, it's pointing out argumentation fallacy.

A young woman has a statistically MUCH higher chance of dying from a reaction to a bee sting than of being sexually assaulted by a trans woman or losing a scholarship to a trans woman. Of being killed by a lightning strike. Of being killed by a fridge or piece of furniture falling on them. Being shot in a mass shooting. Being hit by a car. And so on.

Anonymous wrote:
I'm not the person that is posting about it. I was watching the interaction and was curious why you were so dismissive. I think you should just acknowledge that you believe it is an acceptable risk for women to have to manage in previously female spaces. That is at least an honest conversation, vs pretending that this roll out has been without any problems.

It's odd they quote how rare it is because there are so few trans, but then they throw a fit if we don't accommodate the 1 in 10000.

Math isn't their sport.

At least this is a more honest take. Seems like you’re acknowledging that trans people aren’t a threat but you just don’t want to accommodate them. A lot of people feel this way about people who practice different religions, people with disabilities, anyone who is not exactly like them. Is that you?

I don't read it that way. I think she acknowledged they are a threat and they are rare.

Here's the superintendent of Loudon County Public Schools acknowledging that their policy of allowing so-called trans people into girls locker rooms led to two rapes. After the first girl was raped, they transferred the trans student to another school, where he raped another girl. When one of the fathers brought this up at a school board meeting, they had him arrested. This mea culpa came after months of them calling everyone homophobes. They didn't have any concern for the raped teen girls whatsoever. But they did the right thing and acknowledged that they didnt provide a safe environment.

https://youtu.be/FPgLu5iYsQo?si=rIe2N3bhbyGLyhlE

A certain percentage of people claiming to be trans are actually AGPs. Any honest discussion will admit this. You're okay with having AGPs get into the locker rooms along with the trans, and for women to be raped by them. I mean, just admit it. Then we can go about installing better security in women's spaces, demanding the presence of guards, etc.

We can’t take people that vote for and support pedophiles seriously when talking about children’s concerns. MAGA is the LAST source anyone should be looking to.

To clarify, are you claiming this isnt a real story?

He was indicted and found guilty. Then set free when he turned 18. https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/teen-convicted-of-rape-in-loudoun-county-school-bathroom-free-man-as-of-his-18th-birthday/65-27dcefa6-2eb0-4657-8477-db87a9ecc40f

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Statistically a young woman is vastly more likely to be shot to death in their k12 classroom or on their college campus than to be sexually assaulted by a transwoman. But we are told "too bad, there's nothing that can be done about those shootings, maybe you just need to start lugging a Glock around in the asscrack of your leggings, young lady."

What a crazy world the GOP has put us in.

This dismissive approach towards women's rights isn't helping your case.

Why are you so dismissive toward the much bigger issues of the GOP's eroding of women's rights and control over their lives and bodies? Why are you so dismissive over the gun control crisis? Of the affordability crisis that leaves so many women trapped in bad situations? Why are we supposed to make transwomen the top issue when SO MANY OTHER, FAR BIGGER issues are dragging women down?

Different people have different priorities. Stop deflecting.

Why are you so dismissive of those fighting to protect women’s rights to sex-based protections?

It is 100% my top priority and I won’t apologize for that.

Omg, you posted this while I was writing great last post!

You have literally made this the priority on your life. How sad for you!

PS, you’ll get over it.

Why is it bother you so much that other people have different priorities in their lives? We come from different cultures, religions, countries, of course we all have different priorities. Wishing that other people change their believes to have a uniform compliance to your ideas are communist ideas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whole men-in-women’s-sports issue is a scare tactic. That’s it. This is so incredibly rare. As another poster stated, it should be handled locally on a case by case basis. I only hear republicans talking about this. The only time I hear Democrats talking about it, they are responding to a question. And their answer is basically that it is not a federal government issue. This should be left to families and doctors. Democrats ARE the party of small government, and we need to start claiming that title. Rs want the government up in everyone’s business.

Also, if Rs would stop looking at people’s genitals in locker rooms and restrooms, this would be much less of an issue for them. I have no clue how many times I have shared these spaces with trans people because I don’t stare at people’s genitals.

And yet you could remove this “scare tactic” by abandoning the ridiculous take take that biological males identifying as females have as much right to women’s spaces in sports and locker rooms as biological women, but choose not to.

You could abandon the ridiculous take that we can't have common sense gun reforms. You could abandon the ridiculous take that we can't tax the rich and need to give them tax cut after tax cut. You could abandon the ridiculous take that we can't impose strict campaign finance limitations. You could abandon the ridiculous take that we can't afford healthcare and mental health treatment. I could go on and on and on and these are much bigger and more serious issues affecting women than your bogeyman trans women issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My beyond left-wing young adult DD told me, in secret, that she is appalled by parents having their young kids change gender. I was glad she expressed her opinion, but why does she have to hide it from her friends?
Do you all not agree that it is messed up to allow underage children to change gender?

The gender change thing really affects young Women the most. It’s unsafe for men to be allowed in women’s spaces period

Yes, by far the biggest threat to the safety of young women are trans people. Oh, wait, that might be a little off.

Why are you minimizing women's concern about this?

Why are you grossly overhyping the concern? Is denying base rate a bug or a feature for you? Your argument seems to depend on it. That's not minimization of concern, it's pointing out argumentation fallacy.

A young woman has a statistically MUCH higher chance of dying from a reaction to a bee sting than of being sexually assaulted by a trans woman or losing a scholarship to a trans woman. Of being killed by a lightning strike. Of being killed by a fridge or piece of furniture falling on them. Being shot in a mass shooting. Being hit by a car. And so on.

Anonymous wrote:
I'm not the person that is posting about it. I was watching the interaction and was curious why you were so dismissive. I think you should just acknowledge that you believe it is an acceptable risk for women to have to manage in previously female spaces. That is at least an honest conversation, vs pretending that this roll out has been without any problems.

It's odd they quote how rare it is because there are so few trans, but then they throw a fit if we don't accommodate the 1 in 10000.

Math isn't their sport.

At least this is a more honest take. Seems like you’re acknowledging that trans people aren’t a threat but you just don’t want to accommodate them. A lot of people feel this way about people who practice different religions, people with disabilities, anyone who is not exactly like them. Is that you?

I don't read it that way. I think she acknowledged they are a threat and they are rare.

Here's the superintendent of Loudon County Public Schools acknowledging that their policy of allowing so-called trans people into girls locker rooms led to two rapes. After the first girl was raped, they transferred the trans student to another school, where he raped another girl. When one of the fathers brought this up at a school board meeting, they had him arrested. This mea culpa came after months of them calling everyone homophobes. They didn't have any concern for the raped teen girls whatsoever. But they did the right thing and acknowledged that they didnt provide a safe environment.

https://youtu.be/FPgLu5iYsQo?si=rIe2N3bhbyGLyhlE

A certain percentage of people claiming to be trans are actually AGPs. Any honest discussion will admit this. You're okay with having AGPs get into the locker rooms along with the trans, and for women to be raped by them. I mean, just admit it. Then we can go about installing better security in women's spaces, demanding the presence of guards, etc.

We can’t take people that vote for and support pedophiles seriously when talking about children’s concerns. MAGA is the LAST source anyone should be looking to.

Did anyone actually asked you to take majority of the US votes seriously??? Sorry to burst your delusions, but NO ONE asked you.

[Anonymous]

More proof of the rape of Loudoun teens.

https://wjla.com/features/i-team/teen-suspect-found-guilty-in-loudoun-county-public-school-stone-bridge-high-bathroom-assault

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/virginia-governor-pardons-father-school-girl-sexually-assaulted

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/us/family-loudoun-county-sexual-assault-victim-sues-district-30m-students-rape-school-bathroom.amp