
Posters were mainly talking about GIRLS, and at the older ages: A Team = ECNL (which has been a girls only league) B Team = Green CCL C Team = White CCL2 Younger girls A teams play in CCL. Boys side is totally different. Depends on age group. They only have DA for one year, at 12U, and then you either leave the club for Arlington, Loudoun, or DCU. Or you drop back down and play CCL and maybe some other regional leagues depending on team. Girls side is the strong side. |
Again, why have you written BRYC out of CCL? SYA was in CCL while FCV was there, McLean is in CCL with ECNL and was when they had the boys DA. Loudoun has age groups ins DA and is still in CCL. Please step back from this "CCL A team" narrative. The league is capable of making exceptions. |
Thanks. That I knew, but a lot of the previous posters were talking about DA (Arlington and Loudoun), etc, which only applies to boys, so it was very confusing. |
Yes, but only in the context of CCL. |
I may not have been clear, but my only issue with what you stated is this bit: "Locally, if the ultimate destination for the boys DA is DC United. All the local DAs feed into that." Your comment about DC United is accurate if you look at the way the pyramid and the various affiliations are structured on paper. In reality, the kids who stay in DA may choose to go to Bethesda, Baltimore Armour, or the yet to be named full DA allegedly coming to NoVa instead of DC United. It would be more accurate to say that all the local DAs feed into the full DA programs. It's different in some other markets where the MLS-affiliated DA actually is where most ambitious players strive to end up. |
IF CCL disallows BRYC to remain after the ECNL decision, which league will the younger ages play in? |
That has zero to do with where the kids who do not continue moving up through DA end up playing, especially with the partial DA clubs like Loudoun with the younger ages. Where those kids end up is what was asked. Do kids at non full DA clubs that do not move on with DA matriculate back to the clubs current A team? The answer to that is yes, in most instances. Why are you making this hard? |
There are essentially no B teams at BRYC at U13 and older. So unless CCL intends to excuse BRYC from fielding U13 and older teams (or unless BRYC can swallow another good sized club by this summer) I'm not sure how it can really remain in CCL. |
All of this makes me glad I don't have any kids above the NCSL level.
One side note on BRYC -- they have some teams in ODSL, but I believe they're mostly run out of the club's recreational wing. A couple of those teams have "Elite Academy" in the name, so I'm not sure if those are run by the rec wing or the travel wing. They also have a grand total of two teams in NCSL -- a U11 and a U18. |
Likely either CCL2, NCSL or NPL but I do not see CCL kicking BRYC out. Frankly many area top clubs A teams are spoken for in many instances between DA, ECNL/ENPL and NPL, this leaves CCLs options limited. |
Upon 35 more seconds of reflection I could see BRYC leaning heavily towards NPL. NPL being U.S. Club soccer would allow BRYC to utilize the club pass with their ECNL teams. So, while I still don't think CCL would kick them out I could see BRYC willingly leaving in order to support ECNL. I don't think McLean can move players as easily between CCL and ECNL as club with a NPL team can. |
Right. For the third time, I agree on your main point. If you don't find my effort to clarify your one inaccurate statement helpful, please feel free to ignore. |
A lot also were also talking about DA as applied to girls. It begins this fall and there are franchises near here, including Washington Spirit-Virginia. Arlington and Loudoun are two of the "affiliates" and somehow supposed to feed their top players into Spirit-Virginia DA. Very confusing and lots of moving pieces, especially with Braddock Road pulling down all their website stuff connecting them to the DA, and instead going with ECNL. |
And now for the fourth time, ignoratio elenchi. |
And for the fourth time ignoratio elenchi. |