YouTube Influencer Myka Stauffer "rehomes" adopted son

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Around the time they gave him away she did a giveaway of a LV fanny pack stuffed with $1000.

Priorities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Oh stop. They paid for many therapies for him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Around the time they gave him away she did a giveaway of a LV fanny pack stuffed with $1000.

Priorities.


They aren't paying for a lawyer or the adoption agency. The new family pays all that.

The giveaway was probably a promotion that they got that stuff for free to give away as part of her payment for advertising.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Oh stop. They paid for many therapies for him.


And, what is many therapies? A child with "severe" ASD would be doing 20-40 hours a week of ABA, SP, OT and possibly PT. Plus, the school system can provide therapies for free if money is an issue. They could have done much for that kid. My child was in ST 5 days a week, plus OT and ABA on top of preschool. You do what you need to do. This child also should have had someone who spoke Chinese teaching him English. This was a SN child who spoke no English placed in a family who spoke no Chinese. Of course he's going to have issues, tantrum. Even if he didn't have SN, he would as he cannot communicate in the same language. Its different foods, different customs, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Around the time they gave him away she did a giveaway of a LV fanny pack stuffed with $1000.

Priorities.


They aren't paying for a lawyer or the adoption agency. The new family pays all that.

The giveaway was probably a promotion that they got that stuff for free to give away as part of her payment for advertising.


I don't think the adoptive family pays for the lawyer to defend the adoptive on social media. Their own lawyer? Who filed the adoption paperwork? Yes, the new family probably paid for that. I also don't think you can assume that costs were passed through to the family the way they would be in a newborn adoption.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My cousin adopted two girls from China when they were 2 and 7 months. They’re in elementary school now. It's interesting because I've had many mixed thoughts about how she's handled their adoptions, but the contrast between her and the Stauffers is still very stark.

My cousin shows them videos in Mandarin. She and her husband took Mandarin classes before the adoption and the girls now take lessons as well. Their family celebrates Chinese New Year and hangs out with other families with adoptees from China. I give her credit for doing these things, but also it's not rocket science - there are lots of simple ways to incorporate another culture into your life when you love and want to relate to someone, whether it be an adoptee or spouse or friend from another culture. I don't see ANY evidence of an attempt by Myka and James to relate to Huxley in this way at all. They were trying to whitewash him. It was always about THEM and forcing him into a certain box. It was never about loving that child at all.


Your cousins did all the right things. Its very different than expecting him to fit in and not take the time. I've even seen some families hire Chinese nannies or aupairs for a year to have a good transition.
Anonymous
According to an article shown on IG, they “hand selected” his new family. So idk why people think that they just gave him away to anyone.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


That's not a surprise as it is hurting their livelihood. They may also have child welfare involved as well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


That's not a surprise as it is hurting their livelihood. They may also have child welfare involved as well.


What’s that even going to matter? They don’t abuse their kids. People who think their kids should be taken away are disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://m.eonline.com/amp/news/1156996/youtuber-myka-stauffer-s-lawyers-speak-out-after-facing-backlash-for-rehoming-adopted-son?__twitter_impression=true


Some quotes don’t age well.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


That's not a surprise as it is hurting their livelihood. They may also have child welfare involved as well.


What’s that even going to matter? They don’t abuse their kids. People who think their kids should be taken away are disgusting.


Who needs to take what is given away freely?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


That's not a surprise as it is hurting their livelihood. They may also have child welfare involved as well.


What’s that even going to matter? They don’t abuse their kids. People who think their kids should be taken away are disgusting.


We don't know what goes on behind closed doors as they don't video that. And, some of those videos with that little boy were abusive, like taping his finger. You get him into OT and get chewy and fidget toys.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


They can afford a lawyer, but refused to pay for adequate therapies for Huxley? Sickening.


Around the time they gave him away she did a giveaway of a LV fanny pack stuffed with $1000.

Priorities.


They aren't paying for a lawyer or the adoption agency. The new family pays all that.

The giveaway was probably a promotion that they got that stuff for free to give away as part of her payment for advertising.


I don't think the adoptive family pays for the lawyer to defend the adoptive on social media. Their own lawyer? Who filed the adoption paperwork? Yes, the new family probably paid for that. I also don't think you can assume that costs were passed through to the family the way they would be in a newborn adoption.



Social media, no, but everything related to the adoption yes. It is customary for the adoptive parents to pay the birth parent (or adoptive parent in this situation) attorney bills, as well as other expenses depending on the state laws. Each party should have their own attorney. They should have an attorney to sign the consent forms and then the adopting families attorney files the adoption paperwork with the consent. An older child adoption works the same way but adoptive parents in some states cannot pay expenses outside of attorney fees. They would have no costs to place this child. However, if it was an agency placement, depending on the state, the agency took the consents and then the agency or the agency attorney filed on behalf of the adoptive parents for the adoption. It can be very quick. Our adoption was finalized in a few months. It only would take longer depending on state laws and if the adopting family had their home study done but if they were with the agency they probably had one done.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oh, and she has gone on to complain about what a difficult baby little Onyx is, too. I wonder if the older ones will start to worry about the baby being "rehomed".


A lot of moms complain when they have difficult babies....


A lot of moms don’t give their kids away....


He was not a baby. Most moms complain, but you don't complain on video/online where the child and your other kids and their friends and families can hear it all. Imagine what that would do to a child. This kid will go online one day and read all about this. Imagine how that will impact him after all the trauma he's had.


I’m sorry but no, he won’t go online one day and read all this. He has severe special needs and can’t even talk. He will never go and read about himself online.


He may be more there than people realize.



Ehhh, I don’t think so unfortunately. Never heard him talk in any videos on YouTube or IG. He’s four but seems to have the mindset of a 1 year old. I just don’t ever see him being a “normal kid”.


I know several kids including mine who did not talk till after four.


Did they have strokes in the womb and neuro specialists looking at their brain scans advising they would never take this on themselves and that issues would likely be lifelong? Because this child had that. Doesn't justify the parent's actions, but when you have specialists looking at neurological activity and saying, "I wouldn't..." that doesn't bode well normally.


What doctor is going to blab out to the parent of a child that they should give the child away rather than treat the child? It's not even a believable statement, it sounds like an excuse to support their choice to giving him away.


Not giving away a child, but that this was well known prior to adoption and the adoptive parents accepted this risk, against medical advice. And here they are...


They are giving him away. What else do you want to call it? You want to make it sound nice... we're putting him up for adoption? They aren't even doing a legal adoption.


How do you know that? I thought I heard that they used their adoption agency for the placement in the new home, which almost certainly means that it is a legal adoption.


I hope that their legal fees are astronomical and that these two awful people will be forced to spend as much of their waking life as possible working 3 jobs. May caring, nice people surround their children and guide them through life.


The new adoptive family pays the legal fees. They walk away, new family pays everything and its a 5 minute court hearing and done.


They have a lawyer threatening people on social media. Who knows how long they’ll retain him to clean up their mess.


That's not a surprise as it is hurting their livelihood. They may also have child welfare involved as well.


What’s that even going to matter? They don’t abuse their kids. People who think their kids should be taken away are disgusting.


We don't know what goes on behind closed doors as they don't video that. And, some of those videos with that little boy were abusive, like taping his finger. You get him into OT and get chewy and fidget toys.


JFC. This was covered PAGES AGO. They were advised to do this by doctors. All they have to do is pull records of that up and boom, no issue. Plus that was not even remotely close to being abusive. Stop the dramatics.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: