Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PSA all: disappear is NOT a verb. Stop using it as one. Thank you. [/quote
Of course it is a verb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PSA all: disappear is NOT a verb. Stop using it as one. Thank you.

Merriam Webster even defines it in the manner you say it is not valid, as a transitive verb.

[Anonymous]

What authority does the USA have to remove a citizen from their country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What authority does the USA have to remove a citizen from their country?

Ask the Americans that ICE deports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What authority does the USA have to remove a citizen from their country?

He's not "in his country", he's at a US-funded prison. Of course we can get him back. Is that a serious question?

[Anonymous]

Process- tell El Salvador we want him back, then deport him to Panama.

Alternatively, hold him at the US embassy in El Salvador, AG Bondi reopens the case and appeals the withholding of removal, then release him in El Salvador.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:PSA all: disappear is NOT a verb. Stop using it as one. Thank you.

It absolutely, literally is a verb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
You just made that up. No court or judge has ever deemed him to be a danger.

In April of 2019, then BIA denied his appeal.

I don't have the case numbers but it is here in pages 32-38.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A949/354843/20250407103341248_Kristi%20Noem%20application.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

when?

In 2019, the same time the gave him the protection from deportation.

You just made that up. No court or judge has ever deemed him to be a danger.

It happened. The current judge skips over it an djust says he was denied bond.

Show us some evidence please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You just made that up. No court or judge has ever deemed him to be a danger.

In April of 2019, then BIA denied his appeal.

I don't have the case numbers but it is here in pages 32-38.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A949/354843/20250407103341248_Kristi%20Noem%20application.pdf

He was granted withholding and would have been granted asylum except he missed the one year bar.

Y'all need to get a grip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

when?

In 2019, the same time the gave him the protection from deportation.

You just made that up. No court or judge has ever deemed him to be a danger.

It happened. The current judge skips over it an djust says he was denied bond.

Show us some evidence please.

Page 33 of the pdf right above your post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What authority does the USA have to remove a citizen from their country?

He's not "in his country", he's at a US-funded prison. Of course we can get him back. Is that a serious question?

Where is that prison located again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You just made that up. No court or judge has ever deemed him to be a danger.

In April of 2019, then BIA denied his appeal.

I don't have the case numbers but it is here in pages 32-38.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24A949/354843/20250407103341248_Kristi%20Noem%20application.pdf

I'll read the whole thing tomorrow. The parts that read said he was denied asylum because he didn't apply in time. Given that he was a kid escaping death threats, you're hardly winning the argument here.

The other part I read did not say that the judge deemed he was a danger \but rather that he had "not proven he was not a danger". This is totally different in a court of law and is more about the burden of proof. It implies that the individual has failed to present enough convincing evidence to satisfy the judge that they do not pose a danger. It doesn't mean the judge is convinced they are a danger, just that the individual hasn't met their burden to show otherwise. There might be insufficient evidence either way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Supreme Court also threw Judge Boasberg off the case for the Venezuelans being deported under Alien Enemies Act.
These courts lack jurisdiction to hear the case, and have been issuing TROs regardless.
Contracts have to go to federal court of claims.
These guys have to go to court where they are being held.

huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Supreme Court also threw Judge Boasberg off the case for the Venezuelans being deported under Alien Enemies Act.
These courts lack jurisdiction to hear the case, and have been issuing TROs regardless.
Contracts have to go to federal court of claims.
These guys have to go to court where they are being held.

Let’s see if the government stops hiding these people from their attorneys.

File that one under: “things which never happened.