Hunter - the right got what they wanted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

I debated how to respond to your list of crap. Decided it was best not to tic down each item because when you start off accusing the WB of being some "disgruntled maga," your post isn't worth the time it would take to present you with the evidence that you clearly have not seen or choose to ignore.

Wallow in your ignorance. Just don't try to have a meaningful discussion with people who are following this case and know the facts. You will look like a total dingbat.

'facts'




Same facts you were told about Pizzagate, her emails, Vince Foster, Seth Rich, black helicopters, etc?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

I debated how to respond to your list of crap. Decided it was best not to tic down each item because when you start off accusing the WB of being some "disgruntled maga," your post isn't worth the time it would take to present you with the evidence that you clearly have not seen or choose to ignore.

Wallow in your ignorance. Just don't try to have a meaningful discussion with people who are following this case and know the facts. You will look like a total dingbat.

DP, not the one you're responding to. Why are you so intent on convincing strangers on an anonymous forum of HB and JB's alleged crimes/misdeeds? Seriously, what are you hoping to accomplish? Say you convince a few of us--then what? If there's something to these allegations, the truth will come out eventually. Maybe not fast enough for you, but eventually. And if not under a Democratic administration then under a Republican one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

you realize the prosecutor had and has, free reign to charge whatever he would like. If anything, the charges leveled so far are political in the sense that no regular American would get charged with the same thing. Hunter is getting charged BECAUSE he is the President's son.

You realize that without SC status, prosecutors need permission in other jurisdictions, like DC where j6 hero Matthew Graves denied Weiss. Hunter is being protected BECAUSE he is the President's son.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

I debated how to respond to your list of crap. Decided it was best not to tic down each item because when you start off accusing the WB of being some "disgruntled maga," your post isn't worth the time it would take to present you with the evidence that you clearly have not seen or choose to ignore.

Wallow in your ignorance. Just don't try to have a meaningful discussion with people who are following this case and know the facts. You will look like a total dingbat.

DP, not the one you're responding to. Why are you so intent on convincing strangers on an anonymous forum of HB and JB's alleged crimes/misdeeds? Seriously, what are you hoping to accomplish? Say you convince a few of us--then what? If there's something to these allegations, the truth will come out eventually. Maybe not fast enough for you, but eventually. And if not under a Democratic administration then under a Republican one.

I'm not. That is why I didn't go down her ridiculous list. It wouldn't make a difference anyway. That pp is pig-headed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

you realize the prosecutor had and has, free reign to charge whatever he would like. If anything, the charges leveled so far are political in the sense that no regular American would get charged with the same thing. Hunter is getting charged BECAUSE he is the President's son.

You realize that without SC status, prosecutors need permission in other jurisdictions, like DC where j6 hero Matthew Graves denied Weiss. Hunter is being protected BECAUSE he is the President's son.

Save your time with these uninformed people. They don't care. They have their "facts" and nothing you say will convince them of anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

you realize the prosecutor had and has, free reign to charge whatever he would like. If anything, the charges leveled so far are political in the sense that no regular American would get charged with the same thing. Hunter is getting charged BECAUSE he is the President's son.

You realize that without SC status, prosecutors need permission in other jurisdictions, like DC where j6 hero Matthew Graves denied Weiss. Hunter is being protected BECAUSE he is the President's son.

Yep. And, this is no surprise.....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

you realize the prosecutor had and has, free reign to charge whatever he would like. If anything, the charges leveled so far are political in the sense that no regular American would get charged with the same thing. Hunter is getting charged BECAUSE he is the President's son.

You realize that without SC status, prosecutors need permission in other jurisdictions, like DC where j6 hero Matthew Graves denied Weiss. Hunter is being protected BECAUSE he is the President's son.

Yep. And, this is no surprise.....

Very sad that justice became political. Did Russians indeed changed our legal system that we became completely lawless country?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They are desperate.

They are complaining about the FORMAT of the messages. Anyone with any sense knows that the CONTENTS of the messages is what's significant.
The format is not what the committee has. The content is. Someone simply made a graphic with the content in it. And, the content came from Apple because of a subpoena.
Such a rookie whine from an attorney. But, I guess he will convince some naive people with his complaint.

[Anonymous]

Didn't the GOP just penalize Schiff for about the same thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't the GOP just penalize Schiff for about the same thing?

No. Not even close.

The revised resolution says Schiff held positions of power during Trump’s presidency and “abused this trust by saying there was evidence of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia.”

“Representative Schiff purposely deceived his Committee, Congress, and the American people,” the resolution said.

https://apnews.com/article/schiff-censure-house-republicans-russia-trump-318300df0f7b4f51c5b0ba5dd91edd23

Part of the deception was when he was on the dais and made up a conversation Trump had with Zelensky.
For a chairman to do that is outrageous.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

You’ll get Clinton Obama Clinton Clinton Obama Schiff Pelosi Clinton Schiff Soros Biden Biden Clinton Schiff Pelosi Clinton Biden Biden today for sure! Pizzagaaaaaaaaaate! Adrenochroooooooooooome!!!!!111!!

[Anonymous]

In a Friday night dump, David Weiss responds to Jim Jordan confirming he couldn't prosecute in DC and California on crimes by Biden Inc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't the GOP just penalize Schiff for about the same thing?

No. Not even close.

The revised resolution says Schiff held positions of power during Trump’s presidency and “abused this trust by saying there was evidence of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia.”

“Representative Schiff purposely deceived his Committee, Congress, and the American people,” the resolution said.

https://apnews.com/article/schiff-censure-house-republicans-russia-trump-318300df0f7b4f51c5b0ba5dd91edd23

Part of the deception was when he was on the dais and made up a conversation Trump had with Zelensky.
For a chairman to do that is outrageous.

Uh, there was evidence, it was embedded in the GOP Senate Intel Report from 2000 that was authored by Marco Rubio. It was also detailed in the Mueller Report and in the sentencing documents for both Paul Manafort and Roger Stone. Why do you ignore these facts?