Hunter - the right got what they wanted

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

[Anonymous]

Who cares about Hunter Biden? He isn't, wasn't and never will be an elected official.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

[Anonymous]

More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

[Anonymous]

Anyone who cares about hUntEr biDeN is a right wing extremist.

The matter has been thoroughly looked over, and all a judge could come up with was a few minor charges. His custody payments will shortly be reduced (from 20K a month).

This Hunter guy is not an evil-doer. He's a former drug addict, he definitely slept around, traded a little on his last name like all nepo babies... but his father never received any bribes and neither did anyone in elected office as a result of his actions.

You can go on looking, if you please. It will stop you from doing more nefarious things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

Pearls before swine, PP. They don’t understand it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

I debated how to respond to your list of crap. Decided it was best not to tic down each item because when you start off accusing the WB of being some "disgruntled maga," your post isn't worth the time it would take to present you with the evidence that you clearly have not seen or choose to ignore.

Wallow in your ignorance. Just don't try to have a meaningful discussion with people who are following this case and know the facts. You will look like a total dingbat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

DP
-The guy is not a whistleblower. He is a disgruntled maga trying to grift some money. All the “whistleblowers” coming forwards have been paid by Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan and the operatives admit it.

-HB Biden paid all his back taxes, interest and penalties.

-No, the charges are much more severe vs what he actually did. In fact under 1% of people charge with lying to purchase a gun are prosecute and only the ones who lie about arrest/convictions. ATF form 4473 is only checked against National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). It does not flag people who use illegal drugs unless they are arrested and convicted. There are no examples of someone being charge, prosecutor and convicted for lying about drug use on a 4473. They have no means to check for that.

-Garland’s DOJ did not interfere with this case. Trump’s DOJ did.

-Weiss is a trump appointee and was not restricted in away. He has said so and has sent letter saying the same to Jim Jordan.

You are just so full of Bullsh#t. The judge should throw out these charges and let HB go free. This is a political witch-hunt.

Good God. Your knowledge of the whistleblower's evidence is nonexistent.
As is your knowledge of everything else about this case.

Lol sure. I noticed you have not refuted anything. Here is the thing you should have learned when you were pushing the fake election sh#t. If you lie in a court, you will be punished. Your propaganda and lies are not worth the data byte used to make them.

When will your operatives appear in court to give sworn evidence. Love to see what happens when they get cross examined under oath. How much have they been paid?

And, one more thing..... These whistleblowers are under the threat of prosecution if they lie. They have had interviews with the subcommittee. So, they have already been under oath.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In the past few years this topic has been suppressed, because"Hunter is a private citizen." The whistleblower thread was locked, yet the story continued. When Hunter entered a water down plea, the title of this thread said it all, yet has turned on all the Biden apologists as the story continued to grow. Can't wait to watch Nicole Wallace's fluff interview later today of Joe as the proximity between continues to narrow.

The "whistleblower" is not findable.
The story persists because of the same reasons Pizzagate even became a thing - low information idiots continue to believe "news outlets" lies and half truth in search of some greater meaning.

Nicole Wallace is a traditional conservative republican. That you belittle her shows how far off the rails the right has devolved.

WUT?

The whistleblower has identified himself. He is absolutely credible and not only has his testimony, but he also has written documentation.
And, there is nothing conservative about Nicole Wallace. The idea that you believe that is laughable. One gander at her Twitter feed and you know she is no conservative.

She worked in the Bush White House. Again, it just shows what the definition of "conservative" is and how the right has fallen off the deep end over the past decade.

And...did you keep repeating the "whistleblower" lies. There is documentary exculpatory evidence that shows no impropriety by the Bidens where Burisma is concerned.

You are talking about a different whistleblower, honey. I am talking about the IRS whistleblower who has evidence that....
- HB had income that he did not pay taxes on. Ever.
- The "charges" that have been brought have underestimated the amount of taxes he actually owed.
- DOJ put numerous obstacles up to prevent the IRS from completing a full investigation on HB and *any* investigation of Joe Biden, even though they had evidence that warranted investigation. Not only would DOJ attorneys in LA and DC not allow Weiss to bring charges, the DOJ tipped off Hunter's attorneys about the search of a storage unit.
- Weiss did not have full control over charges - who to charge, where to charge, what to charge.
And, there are other huge red flags about the investigation from the whistleblower.

The judge should reject the plea deal.

Oh THAT whsitleblower, then you should read this:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More evidence that the DOJ never wanted to properly prosecute this case.

You realize the case is being handled by a Trump appointed special counsel, right?

You realize the case was blocked by other AUSA and Weiss was denied SC status, right?

you realize the prosecutor had and has, free reign to charge whatever he would like. If anything, the charges leveled so far are political in the sense that no regular American would get charged with the same thing. Hunter is getting charged BECAUSE he is the President's son.