Restorative Justice is struggling to show success in MCPS according to students, parents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

to add.. violent behavior is not as bad in ES as it is in MS/HS, and RJ works better for ES aged kids, not teens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

to add.. violent behavior is not as bad in ES as it is in MS/HS, and RJ works better for ES aged kids, not teens.

It doesn't work well at any age as the victim should not be forced to sit through a fake apology. And, kids need consequences. If they are behaving like that, forcing them to do a fake apology means nothing. And, since things are worse, not better, clearly it's not working.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

to add.. violent behavior is not as bad in ES as it is in MS/HS, and RJ works better for ES aged kids, not teens.

I don't know about any of that but it worked great at our school for resolving an issue with bullying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

to add.. violent behavior is not as bad in ES as it is in MS/HS, and RJ works better for ES aged kids, not teens.

I don't know about any of that but it worked great at our school for resolving an issue with bullying.

grade? Also, anecdotal data is just that. Look at the article OP posted.

It's like saying "supply side economics works because I own a shop that caters to the rich, and so I did well. See.. it works." No, it doesn't work like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

Good thing we aren't in FL or TX.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

Good thing we aren't in FL or TX.

May as well be since it could happen anywhere given our lax gun laws.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

So he is an MCPS parent then.

Anyone can donate without being a parent.

His kids are at a private. That's a fact. I know a parent whose kid attends the same private.

At least one is at MCPS

ES?

to add.. violent behavior is not as bad in ES as it is in MS/HS, and RJ works better for ES aged kids, not teens.

I don't know about any of that but it worked great at our school for resolving an issue with bullying.

grade? Also, anecdotal data is just that. Look at the article OP posted.

It's like saying "supply side economics works because I own a shop that caters to the rich, and so I did well. See.. it works." No, it doesn't work like that.

Yes, anecdotal data is not reliable data. Is like old saying, "I drink vodka daily, and I am still alive. Therefore vodka is good for health." This is not true! I know the article OP posted is reliable. The progressive propaganda machine wants to brainwash the masses. They want you to believe that RJ works, but I tell you, it does NOT!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

Good thing we aren't in FL or TX.

May as well be since it could happen anywhere given our lax gun laws.

well, gee, gun laws don't work, so might as well get rid of gun laws, period, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

Good thing we aren't in FL or TX.

May as well be since it could happen anywhere given our lax gun laws.

well, gee, gun laws don't work, so might as well get rid of gun laws, period, right?

Maybe you haven't noticed but we don't have any.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jawandon't use public schools

At the council meeting last week, he told the MCPS head of transportation that his kid likes their bus driver.

His youngest may still be going to MCPS elementary school. The oldest are definitely at SSFS. You can see it in his social media and if you Google, you can find a link of PTA parent donors with his name on there.

OK? Seems like where his kids go to school is a family matter, and none of our business.

When he is advocating to make public schools unsafe for our kids it speaks volumes of his character. His kids get safe schools while ours have to contend with violence, bullying, sexual assaults daily?

I thought he was against SROs? If he's trying to make schools less safe, he would be pro-SRO at least based on the actual studies.

He is against SRO's and any kind of discipline or consequences.

So you're saying he's for making schools safer then since studies indicate their presence makes kids less safe just look at Parkland and Uvalde.

Good thing we aren't in FL or TX.

May as well be since it could happen anywhere given our lax gun laws.

well, gee, gun laws don't work, so might as well get rid of gun laws, period, right?

Maybe you haven't noticed but we don't have any.

False.